patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

$1 Million Firehouse Land Buy Before Voters Thursday

District 1 residents asked to decide $1 million land purchase for new firehouse on Hadley and Hooper Avenue

 

A $1 million land buy for a new firehouse will be in the hands of voters in Toms River Fire District 1 on Thursday.

The special referendum vote affects just those districts served by Toms River Fire District 1: generally, downtown Toms River, East Dover and the barrier island. District 2, which is Pleasant Plains, Silverton and North Dover, is not impacted by the vote.

District 1 is aiming to move Toms River Fire Co. No. 1 & 2, which operate out of the Robbins Street and Water Street stations currently, into a new firehouse to be built on Hadley and Hooper Avenue where Williamson Realty currently is.

District 1 Administrator Brian Kubiel, also the township council vice president, said moving the two downtown firehouses out of their current facilities is an idea at least two decades old.

“Fire Company Number 1 is outdated. Fire Company Number 2 is in the flood plain,” Kubiel said.

 

Referendum would approve land buy, not building

Should voters approve the referendum question, district 1 would be authorized to buy the land for the project.

That figure does not include the cost of drafting up plans for the firehouse, or actually building it.

“We can’t legally ask for a building dollar amount with out voters first approving the land buy,” Kubiel said.

He would not say how much the construction of the firehouse would cost.

“Your guess is as good as mine,” he said. He declined to even name a possible minimum for the project or a ballpark figure. “We’re just not in a position to say.”

District 1 Fire Commissioner Mark Autenrieth said that building a fire house is not comparable to building a house, and that project estimates are tough to calculate at this stage.

“The costs for this type building is quite hard to price out,” Autenrieth said. “To  handle wear and tear they face…an estimate is not determined like a regular house.”

Kubiel and Autenrieth said it’s not possible to estimate the cost of the building without first approving the site it will go on.

However, while project specifics aren’t available, Kubiel said the firehouse would allow a 95-foot ladder truck currently housed on Cardinal Drive district 1 substation to be better accessible.  The firehouse would jointly serve Co. 1 & 2. The two fire houses are now about two blocks from each other in downtown Toms River.

 

Not a tax increase

Kubiel and Autenrieth said the referendum is not a tax question. Instead, the commissioners are asking voters to authorize the district to spend on the land buy.

Voting yes would not impact the local tax levy.

It’s also not for bonding out to cover the costs of the land buy. Instead, the way the fire district operates, an appropriation question is posed to voters, Kubiel said.

“The fire district is governed by election rules different from the school or municipal election,” he said.

The Thursday vote asks district 1 residents whether $1 million should be spent on the land purchase. A second question on the referendum pertains to the purchase of a back-up generator, at a cost of $48,750 for the district’s share of an emergency generator for the Toms River Fire Academy.

 

Voting only at West Water Street Firehouse

To vote on the referendum, district 1 voters have one polling location: the Toms River Fire Co. No. 2 firehouse, 45 West Water St. The polls are open from 2 to 9 p.m.

The West Water Street firehouse is the only place to vote. Autenrieth said that in the annual fire elections, District 1 has three polling places: the Ocean Beach Firehouse on the barrier island, Fire Co. No. 2’s West Water Street house, and the East Dover Fire Company on Fischer Boulevard.

“The minimum we’re required to have is one,” Kubiel said.

He said they’ve publically advertised the election three times, which is more than the minimum that’s required. Kubiel said the district is hoping to spread the word to increase voter turnout and counter misinformation on the referendum by buying local ad space, publically posting referendum information, and have put the ballot question up on the township Web site.

Kubiel said the downtown fire house was selected as the single polling place because it has the highest voter turnout in the annual election.

“It’s the bigger of the three polling spots,” he said.

When asked why only one polling place will be open instead of more, Kubiel said, “The statute says we only need one polling place… We chose to open the one the majority of voters go to.”

A voter in North Beach that would previously have voted at the Ocean Beach Fire House would instead travel to West Water Street to vote.

“Unfortunately that’s the case. Where we analyzed the voters are, we chose the polling location based on that,” Kubiel said. “Some of the comments we’ve heard from residents were about the polling location; and as a result of that it (voting locations) may be different in the future.”

 

A referendum before year’s end

Kubiel said the voting date is not the best time of year.

“We understand the timing is an issue. It’s the holidays,” Kubiel said.

Then why not wait until the regular fire election day, which is held in February? The annual election day is on a Saturday and chooses the elected fire commissioners, and last election also had appropriation questions. In February 2011, 395 votes were cast town-wide.

Kubiel said the reason the special election was held was a successful vote would be required before year’s end to appropriate the money in 2012.

“We have to get the voters’ approval in the prior year,” he said.

He said the commissioners had a special meeting Nov. 9 to discuss the possibility of buying the property and progressing to a letter of intent with the realty.

“We’ve never progressed this far in the discussion,” he said.

At the November meeting, the commissioners agreed to proceed and hold a special referendum before year’s end, based on the time-sensitive nature of a land buy, he said.

“If timing wasn’t a key component, we wouldn’t be faced with having this referendum,” Kubiel said.

Autenrieth said the last time a special referendum was held was five or six years ago when a truck had serious repair issues.

“We’re not in the habit of having these,” Kubiel said. “We just agreed it was time to move on the deal… and we hope voters agree it’s a worthwhile project.”

 

A idea 20 years or older

Autenrieth said the idea of moving both firehouses into a new location is not a new one.

“We’ve been trying to do this for at least 20 years now,” he said. Previously, the commissioners pursued property on the Highland Parkway, Mott Place, Washington Street and Lexington Avenue.

None progressed as far as the negotiations for Hooper and Hadley avenues, he said.

Issues with traffic downtown are among the factors motivating the commissioners to seek a new site for the two existing fire houses.

“It’s hard to get out of both houses,” Autenrieth said. That’s because of traffic but also because of the turning radius the apparatus need.

Autenrieth said both Fire Co. No. 1 & 2 are outdated, with No. 1 on Robbins Street the older of the two firehouses.

He said Fire Co No. 2 is also in the flood plain of the Toms River. Sandbags come out in case Irons Street begins to flood, in storm conditions such as August’s Hurricane Irene, for example.

Autenrieth said that the doors of the existing firehouses also limit what apparatus can be housed there, as the smallest clearance is nine feet.

Kubiel said the new location would be more accessible for volunteers to get to quicker than they get to the downtown houses.

 “We want to do what creates the more efficient fire company,” Kubiel said.

 

Residents raise questions

In a Monday interview, Kubiel repeatedly said the referendum will not pave the way for a paid fire district.

“That has never been discussed. No way we’re even bringing that up,” he said.

Autenrieth said it’s not something he’d want here. “The tradition is of volunteerism,” Autenrieth said. “And just the tax impact alone, it would double.”

Resident Nels Luthman said there’s multiple concerns with the referendum, such as the timing of the election, the lack of polling locations, the lack of information on the project.

“The Fire Commissioners say they don't know what it will cost.  How do you start a project without knowing the total cost?  Either you know and do not want the public to know or you don't which is even worse,” Luthman said.

He said last week’s fire commissioners meeting did not provide many answers to his questions. He also brought up the concern at the second November Township Council meeting.

“Most modern fire houses cost at least $8 million to build,” Luthman said.

Related Topics: Commissioners, Downtown, Fire Department, Firehouse, Hadley Avenue, New Firehouse, Referendum, hooper avenue, land buy, and toms river fire co. no. 1

Lomac

7:40 am on Tuesday, December 13, 2011

So the 95-foot truck is a mile away--maybe two. Getting it where it's needed is easier from Cardinal Drive than from Hooper Avenue, with the worst intersections for traffic in the town.

Reply

Murphdog20

7:57 am on Tuesday, December 13, 2011

you're right. And, the ladder doesn't respond to the firehouse; it responds to the scene of the fire.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Martin

5:09 am on Wednesday, December 14, 2011

Aren't the part-time fire district commissioners PAID for their once-in-a-while meetings? In concert with the firefighters who want this new castle in their little empire, they planned this expensive land grab, the undisclosed bldg. cost ($8 million PLUS), the unknown cost of getting out of 2 existing firehouse leases -- and the secret holiday-season election that should have been part of the Nov. ballot or the regular Feb. fire district election.

The commissioners must be political cronies appointed because of their campaign contributions, not for any firefighting or municipal planning or budgeting expertise.

"District 1 Administrator Brian Kubiel is also the township council vice president." He woke up feeling cocky the day after the Repub. win last month, and on Nov. 9th the commissioners OKd this referendum for Dec. His statements blame the other party for any legitimate misgivings.

This is a losing proposition -- if enough taxpayers show up on Thursday. Tell your neighbors. ENOUGH of these multi-million-dollar political shenanigans. We can't afford them!

Kubiel admitted a "yes" vote means there'll be an extra $1 million in the Feb. budget -- and that'll be followed by higher taxes. That's for an old house worth less than half of that. What's the hurry? Real estate isn't "time-sensitive" these days. Let's see the appraisals of its true value. Let's have a full public discussion of the purported need for this multi-million-dollar project.

Comment_arrow

John V

10:28 am on Wednesday, December 14, 2011

Martin,

Have you talked to any firefighters in town? I know several of them and NONE of them want this new firehouse either. There is a reason why we have two fire companies 2 blocks from each other and the firefighters prefer that the status quo reamins and not be forced together into a building that they have no control over. Right now both fire compaines own the building themselves and the Fire Commisioners rent the buildings from them to house the fire trucks. Neither of the companies want a new building that they have no control over. Its kind of funny actually, the last couple of years people have complained why we have 2 fire houses around the corner from each other and now that they proposed to combine them all of a sudden these same people are now saying its a waste of money. Ask the firefighters themselves what they want....they want to keep control over their own buildings and not give up control to the fire commisioners.

walt tupycia

9:03 am on Tuesday, December 13, 2011

how come such a short notice for a vote.

Reply

Marynary

11:07 am on Tuesday, December 13, 2011

This appears to be something that is forced through without true public approval.

Reply

GaryR

11:40 am on Tuesday, December 13, 2011

Shouldn't the TOTAL price be available before the vote? Let's say the new building, tear down of what is currently there, & land improvements would cost 3M (hypothetically) ..that would make a total cost of 4M dollars and that would allow the voters to make an educated decision as to how to vote. To be pigeonholed into spending 1M dollars on a piece of land who's only purpose is to house a fire house seems a bit harsh. Once purchased, the cost of the new facility will be forced down the public's throat...regardless of what the cost is. Plus, does that seem like a lot of money for that property? Was an independent appraisal conducted that can be made public? Seems like too many questions have to be answered before this goes to a public vote...don't you think more facts are needed before such an important decision is made?

Reply

1stcav

11:54 am on Tuesday, December 13, 2011

They want this passed so they can say " we left it up to the voters" But what therer not doing is telling you the REAL total costs...To bye, tear down, fees for plans and drawings, permits , new equiptment materials, labor ect...The back door price about 6-7 Million and owneed by the Fire Commish's of TR as a way of getting a foot in the door for the coming PAIDED fire Dept. Smoke & mirrors...& tax payers loose... No way , not in these HARD times.

Reply

Larry

12:44 pm on Tuesday, December 13, 2011

will only district one voters be asked to pay for this ?

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Catherine Galioto

1:17 pm on Tuesday, December 13, 2011

Yes, Larry. Voting is only for district 1. District 2 does not participate in the voting of this project.

barbara mount kornek

1:01 pm on Tuesday, December 13, 2011

This is long overdue and the voters need to take a serious look and this and VOTE YES! Just remember that the men and women of these two "VOLUNTEER" fire companies are just that - volunteers! Volunteer Firefighters are a huge cost saving to the taxpayers.

Reply

Rich49

1:46 pm on Tuesday, December 13, 2011

I want proof on the cost of the land. I think we are being ripped off. The town should take it for the betterment of the public, at NO COST. Yet another slap in the taxpayers face. This should be voted down until they come up with a total cost.

Reply
Comment_arrow

R. Mc

3:46 pm on Tuesday, December 13, 2011

The Zillow real estate website values the property at $240K. www.zillow.com

Comment_arrow

Diana Brunner

1:40 pm on Wednesday, December 14, 2011

Dear R.Mc, Please do not use Zillow to estimate the value of a property. It is notoriously inaccurate. It also says that the property is a single family home, if you read the description, instead of an obviously commercial property on a bustling main road. All Zillow is is a computer program based off of recently closed sales looking in a very small proximatey around the property. It doesn't know how to distinguish variables. If you want to know the values of property you need to speak with a professional local real estate broker. Like me. If anyone has any questions regarding an accurate opinion of the value of this property feel free to e-mail Diana@DianaBrunner.com

D. Brown

2:19 pm on Tuesday, December 13, 2011

I do believe that the commissioners must have a rough idea of how much this facility will cost, and should give the public at least a general idea.

Reply

Laci

3:40 pm on Tuesday, December 13, 2011

I could of sworn we just had township elections 35 days ago so why wasn't the question put on the ballet at that time?.

Reply

E. Eytan

4:43 pm on Tuesday, December 13, 2011

No way this should be approved at this time in this manner, without critical information.
By the way, who owns the property, disclose who is making what appears to be a huge profit on the deal, at taxpayer expense!

Reply

walt tupycia

4:45 pm on Tuesday, December 13, 2011

how much will this cost taxpayers to put this on a ballot.We just had a vote.Maybe they do not want anyone to vote except the firemen.

Reply

walt tupycia

4:46 pm on Tuesday, December 13, 2011

The AG needs to look into this.

Reply

walt tupycia

4:47 pm on Tuesday, December 13, 2011

why not put this on feb elections lot cheaper save taxpayers money.

Reply

walt tupycia

4:50 pm on Tuesday, December 13, 2011

for a volunteer department why is it costings millions to run.Might be cheaper to hire a contractor to run the fire department.

Reply

John Thievon

4:51 pm on Tuesday, December 13, 2011

What are the three appraisals of this land, with and without the antique residence? 2nd. Who is sharing the cost of this generator and what is the total cost of a generator that sounds like it is made of gold?

Reply

Mike L

4:53 pm on Tuesday, December 13, 2011

Catherine, you must have miss understood Larry's question. It was about paying for it by all districts or just district 1.

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Catherine Galioto

5:13 pm on Tuesday, December 13, 2011

This is a district 1 project. It will be their project to budget, should voters approve it.

Mike L

5:03 pm on Tuesday, December 13, 2011

Do you actually think we have a chance defeating this.....it's over priced, where is the payment coming from, you bet we will be hit with taxes and if it's not then then the taxes we have been overcharged all those years was put away for this. Or will a bond issue be put there in two years for the building. Have we forgot the taxes we are losing on the sale of this from the reality each year, also what will happen to the buildings and land that the firehouses will be vacating??? Bend over hear they come again!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike L

6:49 pm on Tuesday, December 13, 2011

Just for everybody's information, under the freedom of information act the tax rolls are on line and it shows this property is totally valued for tax purposes as $596.600.00. land value at $321,000 and Williamson Reality house at a value of $274,800.00. So who gets the other $400,000, or are they then going to tell they got a break on the property. I am all for Fire Protection but did you see the size of the property that they want to reduce to those two fire houses for. I'm sorry I just think that the lower part of Toms River would not have proper coverage.......

Comment_arrow

walt tupycia

4:07 pm on Thursday, December 15, 2011

mike if you go to the toms river tax payments this property has a lein on it.The only thing i can think of is that the fire department wants to pay off this lein.

walt tupycia

5:15 pm on Tuesday, December 13, 2011

Who owns the property?Maybe sombody famous in oean county?

Reply

walt tupycia

5:20 pm on Tuesday, December 13, 2011

How often does the town use the 95 foot ladder.Must be great for the hallowen parade.This will become obsolet soon maybe they will need a new truck that goes up about 500 feet.This will win a prize in the parade.

Reply

walt tupycia

5:23 pm on Tuesday, December 13, 2011

This is all about i have the best truck for the parade.

Reply

bayway mike

6:35 pm on Tuesday, December 13, 2011

Just keep ripping-off the taxpayers of Toms River!!
And shove this crap downour throats!!
Can't wait for the next property assesment!
It's probably time to place that FOR SALE sign
on the front lawn!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Diana Brunner

1:50 pm on Wednesday, December 14, 2011

Hi Mike! Drop me an e-mail if you're serious about selling or just want to know the value of your property before making any decisions. I'd be happy to provide you with a free comparative market analysis with no obligation. Diana@DianaBrunner.com I am a successful local real estate broker for the past 8 years. I look forward to hearing from you.

John V

7:04 pm on Tuesday, December 13, 2011

From what I hear, the firemen are voting this down too...company 1 and company 2 will both vote no since they do not want to be forced together into the same fire house that neither of them own, company 3 will vote no since it doesnt benefit the beach and company 4 will vote no since their not getting their own new building. The only ones who want this are the commisioners. But everyone shold vote yes on the 2nd question for the generator though.

Reply

Pat S.

9:55 pm on Tuesday, December 13, 2011

Why would anyone on the barrier island vote "yes" on this?!? We have to rely on Seaside to come to our rescue. I guess that's why we have no voting place here. Once again the taxpayers lose.

Reply

SB Girl

8:32 am on Wednesday, December 14, 2011

Perhaps because no one on the barrier island has been informed of this!! If you don't vote (because you don't know about the election) that's as good as voting "yes"...Just sent out an email to the members of our Association to get out and vote!!

Reply

dorym

10:22 am on Wednesday, December 14, 2011

Where is the money coming from? Municipal Bonds? Taxes?

Reply
Comment_arrow

walt tupycia

3:44 pm on Thursday, December 15, 2011

great question they will not tell you.

Concerned

10:43 am on Wednesday, December 14, 2011

I thought our gov. Was going to move fire & school voting to nov. to stop this b.s.! 300 votes should not EVER be able to pass in a twp Of almost 100k people. Wake up people lets take back our schools &fire , if your trusting these people to be concerned about your $. It's your fault.

Reply

John V

10:51 am on Wednesday, December 14, 2011

I question that the residents of the barrier island are going to come and even vote though....After all, you guys sure didn't object when these same fire comisioners put up that HUGE firehouse in Ocean Beach...Now THAT was a waste of money just like this firehouse on the mainland is going to be... And why did Ocean Beach even need a new firehouse, its not like you even have any firefighters there for that huge house. Most of the time you'll get Seaside Heights to come out if your lucky and they're not busy and they might be able to save your foundation.

Reply

Pat S.

2:22 pm on Wednesday, December 14, 2011

That's my point. We've got nothing but a building. We support Toms River through our taxes, but we have to rely on Seaside to put out our fires.

Reply
Comment_arrow

John V

4:03 pm on Wednesday, December 14, 2011

Exactly! Thats why its time for a PAID fire department for the barrier islands! Volunteers just cant cut it, since most volunteers are lower middle class people who cant afford to live out there as it is. Forget this 1 million dollars for a new fire house on the mainland and use it to bring REAL fire protection to the island.

careless fills

2:28 pm on Wednesday, December 14, 2011

Now let's get this right: People who live in fire district #1 need to go to fire company #2 to vote on a random Thursday in December from 2pm to 9pm. How many do you think will get that right, even if they heard about it? I guess that's why they do it this way.

Reply

Max

3:18 pm on Wednesday, December 14, 2011

This smells to high heaven. The next election I'm voting the incumbents OUT!!! They should have all regular fire polling places available, NOT JUST ONE, to let ALL the public be heard. They make it difficult so only the connected people and their friends are the only ones who vote. This is an expense we don't need right now, and the land they chose on Hooper Ave is too small and WAY too expensive. VOTE NO!!!!

Reply

careless fills

3:37 pm on Wednesday, December 14, 2011

I bet the neighbors will love this

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Catherine Galioto

4:53 pm on Wednesday, December 14, 2011

Hi folks, here is the latest article looking at the referendum:
Thursday Referendum Could Mean Possible New Firehouse, But 24 Firefighters Can't Join Voters - Toms River, http://patch.com/A-p18Y

Reply

R

9:33 am on Thursday, December 15, 2011

If you think this stinks, get over there and vote against it! I know I will....

Reply

walt tupycia

10:31 am on Thursday, December 15, 2011

hey catherine this property is only assessed at 596K abd if you go to the toms river website there appears to be a lein on the property.

Reply

walt tupycia

2:46 pm on Thursday, December 15, 2011

will this property come off the tax roll if purchased.

Reply

walt tupycia

3:28 pm on Thursday, December 15, 2011

get ready taxpayers for a big increase next year.People by the water you are being screwed.You will be paying for most of this project.

Reply

walt tupycia

3:29 pm on Thursday, December 15, 2011

this has got to be the biggest BS rush to vote before christmas.

Reply

walt tupycia

3:36 pm on Thursday, December 15, 2011

listen to kubiel he makes no sense on were this money is coming from.where is this money coming from under a matress?No tax increase?Found money people must be stupid if they believe there will be no tax increase.Also why pay double for property that is assesed by the town at 596k.Just take it by domain.

Reply

walt tupycia

3:39 pm on Thursday, December 15, 2011

6 million dollars a year to operate a volenteer fire department.

Reply

walt tupycia

3:49 pm on Thursday, December 15, 2011

With what the fire department did on this election it is time to move all these fire elections to november where the majority will vote and we shoud see a tax decrease.Stop screwing the taxpayers.

Reply

walt tupycia

5:46 pm on Thursday, December 15, 2011

this will cost the taxpayers about 10 million when it is done.

Reply

walt tupycia

5:50 pm on Thursday, December 15, 2011

new truck for the halloween parade new suvs new captain suv etc.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mr. ?

5:53 pm on Thursday, December 15, 2011

Hey Walt, wish you could vote as many times as you post! Ha!

John V

8:27 pm on Thursday, December 15, 2011

Actually Lakewood would be a better model to follow. They are now the largest City in the county and they have PAID firefighters.

Reply

Leave a comment

 

The Toms River Patch
Valentine's Shopping Guide

See the full guide!

Patch Picks