patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Church Withdraws Plans to Open a Homeless Shelter on Property

First Assembly of God Church decides against opening a homeless shelter on site after community uproar

 

The First Assembly of God Church decided last week to withdraw its application to the Township to open and run a homeless shelter on the church premises, at Cedar Grove Road and Bay Avenue in Toms River.

The shelter, to be called the “Lodge,” would have acted as a temporary residence for 40-50 homeless men and women for three months at a time.

Pastor Paul Gifford began the planning of the shelter in early 2011 with other advocates for the homeless, and as the plans progressed the church recently notified nearby neighbors that the application to open the shelter had been filed and upcoming planning meetings were being scheduled.

“It isn’t a question of helping the homeless,” said Pastor Gifford, "but rather, how to help them and where to help them.”

After the notifications were sent to church neighbors, several residents expressed concerns with the plans, saying it would change the character of the neighborhood.

The church, following township code, did properly notify the homes within 200 feet of the church regarding plans for the shelter, but based on advice from their attorney, Pastor Gifford decided to hold an open forum community meeting with residents outside of the 200-foot radius, to present their plans and their objectives in creating the shelter at the church.

The question of “where” is the main concern of the community near the church.

“The program is fine, it is good,” said a resident of the Twin Oaks neighborhood just a few blocks from the Church, “but it doesn’t belong in a residential neighborhood like ours.”

The resident, who declined to give his name, said they and other neighbors were also concerned that there was no clear criteria that proposed residents of the Lodge would have to meet. “The church didn’t really give us clear answers at the community meeting.”

Pastor Gifford, speaking for himself and his church, said he needed three things to be achieved before he would proceed with the plan to open a shelter. First was Congregational approval to proceed further; Second was ensuring that the mission of the Lodge would be supported by the city, state and federal government; and Third, that the residential community would embrace the vision of the Lodge.

While the congregation endorsed the idea, and the government codes would be followed, the response from the community did not coincide with the vision, Gifford said.

“We achieved number 1 and number 2,” said Pastor Gifford, “but with number 3 we had a stand-off.”

Pastor Gifford said his idea of community is not just the few homes around his church or his congregation, but it is the community as a whole — including the greater surrounding area.

Though Bay Avenue is a busy residential corridor, many surrounding off-streets are quieter cul-de-sacs and Cedar Grove Elementary School is nearby.

“My heart and passion is the community,” said Pastor Gifford, “and at the open forum meeting on February 11, hearing the questions and concerns from over 100 of my fellow community members, I knew my church wasn’t the perfect location for the Lodge and few days after that meeting we decided to withdraw our application with the Township.”

Even though Pastor Gifford and the board were met with concern and some anger from community residents at the open forum meeting, he said there was also a sense of genuine concern voiced by the residents for the plight of the homeless and the mission of the Lodge, “but they just didn’t want it in their backyard,” said Pastor Gifford.

Addressing the needs of the homeless in Toms River and throughout Ocean County is a topic that continues to be argued by homeless advocates, who say there is a general lack of facilities in the county. The idea of Lodge-style possibilities was brought up at a forum discussion held at Ocean County Library, March 28, 2011.

The Lodge would have been housed in the Youth Ministry building behind the church and through grants and donations would help rehabilitate the homeless residents by providing medical attention, legal counseling, mental health support, job skills and transportation for a period of three months after which the residents would check-out with skills hopefully to help keep them employed and not homeless, Gifford said. Security patrols and surveillance would occur 24 hours a day and each resident would have to adhere to drug testing prior to being allowed at the Lodge.

But what wasn’t made clear to the community was the type of homeless people that would be allowed to stay at the Lodge.

“We never got a good answer to that,” said the resident of Twin Oaks, “we have a lot of kids around here walking to and from Cedar Grove Elementary, young mothers jogging with their baby strollers, and families; we don’t know what type of history or issues these homeless people will bring with them to our neighborhood. Are they drug addicts or did they just lose their house due to the economy?”

Pastor Gifford said that the criteria for residents of the Lodge was not explained as clearly as it could have been during the open forum meeting.

“We don’t feel defeated though,” said Pastor Gifford. “People believe in the mission of the Lodge, but it just won’t be at our church and in this community. We do embrace the community involvement and will push forward with finding a new location.”

 

Related Topics: Church, God, Homeless, Lodge, Shelter, and first assembly

barbara

9:00 pm on Tuesday, February 21, 2012

Good luck Pastor Gifford, i so hope you find another location for the Lodge.

Reply

Patricia

9:12 pm on Tuesday, February 21, 2012

Praying that this will be resolved and the homeless among us would have the same ability to sleep in a warm, safe place as we do by God's grace. So sad...

Reply

Bob Smith

11:24 pm on Tuesday, February 21, 2012

how sad and selfish for the local residents to be against a shelter for the people who need it most. The one person who said that this was not the right location is what everyone says. Yes as long as it is not in our own backyard. People are people and we need to take care of those most in need. Anyone who would come out against such a project is a very uncaring and insensitive person. If I were the church I would have moved forward anyway with the project. Jesus said we need to take care of the poor. Why is it that those that have it are so unwilling to follow those words.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Allen S. Tiger

2:48 pm on Friday, February 24, 2012

Hi Bob,
Sorry you feel the way you do. The community that told Pastor Paul of The Assembly of God Church that THIS was the wrong location, also made it clear that "we" support and applaud the efforts of his church, as well as that of THE LODGE for this project, as he (and the lodge) was offered help at locating the right place for their porject. You should also know that THE LODGE was NOT truthfull with their presentation and made many contridictions -- it was obvious that THEY had not done their homework, or this location would have never been involved. I think they now understand that. Allen S. Tiger (concerned member of the community, as well as all of Toms River) Please do your homework before you condem next time!

Comment_arrow

Reality1

7:50 pm on Friday, February 24, 2012

go down "to the mission" on Bacharach Boulevard in Atlantic City and check out the derelicts that call that dump their home. They are drunks, drug addicts, kid touchers and criminals. Most of them exploit the good deeds of "the mission". Most of them need to be institutionalized because their crazy, or jailed because they are criminals.

Comment_arrow

tweetiexx

8:17 pm on Friday, February 24, 2012

Thank Reality1....Obviously Tiger doesn't care for our community and wants to see Toms River go down the tubes and turn into a slum like Bacharach Blvd.

Blah blah blah, let the bleeding heart liberals take them home with them. NIMBY...

Eddie

12:43 am on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Typical of the "Not in my backyard syndrome" it is indictive of the direction that the country is headed. Many of the homeless are granted, in need of more than a place to live, but many are just victims of the downturn in the economy and just are in need of some kindness until they can return to the workforce and get on with their lives.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Allen S. Tiger

3:03 pm on Friday, February 24, 2012

Hi Eddie,
You are totally WRONG in your comment of "typical of the 'not in my backyard syndrome'. It has nothing to do with 'my back yard' - it has to do with finding a proper place for a wothy project. You don't spend hundreds of thousands of dollars to renovate a building to where you would be able to get your C.O., with the expectation of only being there 2 years, with possibly a 1 year extention. That is how THE LODGE presented it to the community, along with many other untruths and contradictions. Projects like this do NOT belong in a residential neighborhood in the first place, but after 'we' made that clear to the Church and THE LODGE, 'we' also volunteered to help them find a proper and long term location for their project. Please don't bad mouth what others have done until you know ALL of the fact! Thank you, Allen Tiger

dave

5:48 am on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

let them stay at rittaco's house,he won't be using it for a while

Reply

Richard J. Thomas

6:45 am on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Amazing that these home owners do not have the right to object to something that will obviously detract from the value of they're property. Maybe these bleeding hearts will invite some of the homeless to come to their homes for awhile. Yea right !

Reply
Comment_arrow

Allen S. Tiger

3:18 pm on Friday, February 24, 2012

Hi Richard,
It is too bad that you did not get your facts straight or you might not have responded the way you did. Actually, 'we' DO have the right to object to something that will detract from our property value. Also, If you had attended the meeting at the Church you might have learned that "our community" applauded the concept of such a project. Even after outright lies and many contridictions by THE LODGE, 'the community' even offered to help find the proper location for this worthy project. Also, to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars to renovate a building to where you can get your Co for the purpose of utilizing that facility for only 2 years (with a ploible 1 year extention) is plan stupidity! Find the right location for a long term project. I might add that Pastor Paul was quite forthright in the meeting, and I can only presume he was totally embarrassed by the way THE LODGE presented the project to our community. Thank you, Allen S. Tiger

CA Murray

7:02 am on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Is this church involved in Interfaith Hospitality? That might be a start for them to get involved in. However, the location seems a bit far for anyone to walk to. Some place near Rte. 37 where the Ocean Ride bus passes might be more favorable. It's like hosting a banquet that no one can get to. And why aren't the Freeholders looking at empty stores in downtown Toms River as a possibility??
CMurray

Reply
Comment_arrow

Fran

8:55 am on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

It is always refreshing to see someone who is more impressed to make something work in a different way, rather than shooting the messenger or turning on the neighbors who might well be right. Especially since it is a long haul for folks to walk to get there. These are homeless folks. They likely don't have a car, money or a home, right?

Comment_arrow

Allen S. Tiger

3:26 pm on Friday, February 24, 2012

Hi CA,
Thank you for your thoughtful comments. The reality of this situation is the Freeholders probably didn't know about this. THE LODGE (the org. partnering with the Assembly of God Church) was trying to "fast tract" what they were trying to do without truly thinking through their project. I as you, who it their right mind would be willing to put hundreds of thousands of dollars into a facility that they intend to utilize for only 2 years with a possibility of a 1 year extention. There were individuals at the meeting that have offered to help THE LODGE find a proper location where they can establish a long term facility for their project. Allen S Tiger

Live Laugh Love

7:22 am on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

this would have been a huge mistake that close to the school.

Reply

Concerned

7:56 am on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Bob,

Jesus also talked about Judging others in the Bible. I suggest first education on the subject and see what element is predominately homeless and why, Then ask yourself, do you want these individuals walking through your neighborhood. Why not open a battered women shelter, food pantry or Consignment shop all these could help the community in a safe manner.

If this homeless shelter can be done in a safe manner that will protect the neighborhood it intends to help, I suggest the Pastor do his preparation properly and re present it to the local people in a detailed manner explaining the vision and how that vision would be implemented. Most people are very caring and would like to assist anyone in need, just not at the cost of their families safety...

I suggest the Pastor sit down and figure out how his vision can work within the concerns of the neighborhood. Provide examples of how his vision can be accomplished in a safe manner that brings no security concerns to surrounding homes. Put to rest the fears of drug addicts hanging out under street lights smoking while residents lock children in their homes for fear of playing in the neighborhood streets.

In the end the Pastor must provide detailed answers to legitimate concerns and if he can not accomplish that task why should the neighborhood trust he can accomplish running a safe Homeless shelter....

Reply
Comment_arrow

Allen S. Tiger

3:36 pm on Friday, February 24, 2012

Dear Concerned,
Well written. However, do NOT be concerned on this issue. First and formost, the meeting we has at the church was very productive in spite of THE LODGE'S outright lies and other contridicting statements. I can only presume that the pastor totally embarrassed by the presentation. Although 'the community' spoke loudly that this was the wrong venue for this project, that were offers of help to find the proper location for this worthy project. I think all concerned will say the same thing, in the end this exercise was a win win for everyone involved.

Billabong

8:31 am on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Wait, you mean to tell me that the Pastor actually consulted the community on their thoughts and opinions and factored that into the ultimate decision on the shelter? Our elected politicians on the local, state, and federal levels need to take a page out of the Pastor's book and listen and consult the people rather than ramming projects, legislation, etc. down our throats when we don't want it. Whether you are for or against this shelter, you really have to appreciate the Pastor's willingness to listen to the feedback of the local community. (And no, I'm not a member of this church.)

Reply
Comment_arrow

Barnegat Ray

9:10 am on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Exactly...the irony is that we elect people to [supposedly] represent us, yet when they take office, they become part of the machine...no longer listening to the concerns of the people.

Comment_arrow

Allen S. Tiger

3:39 pm on Friday, February 24, 2012

Hi Billabong,
I am also not a member of this church, but I am a member of the local community involved. You are 100% correct -- the Pastor needs to be applauded for his leadership.

LA RUE

8:32 am on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Why doesn't the church look into some of the many vacant stores in small malls? The Lord knows there many to choose from.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Allen S. Tiger

3:43 pm on Friday, February 24, 2012

Hi La Rue,
Be assured that the church and the group they are partnering with in this worthy project are getting help from individuals in the community to find the proper place for a 'long term' facility, instead of the 2 year proposed program at the church.

barbara

8:36 am on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

C.A. Murray, i was thinking the same thing. Why can't the freeholders look into this. There are plenty of empty stores and buildings in this town. Just look at the Bellcrest Mall on Fischer Blvd. as one example.

Concerned mentions the fact to put to rest the fears of drug addicts hanging out under the street lights while smoking, not all homeless people in this day and age are drug addicts. The economy is very bad and alot of people are losing their jobs and home. I believe the article mentioned that drug testing would be a criteria.

Reply
Comment_arrow

tweetiexx

3:51 pm on Friday, February 24, 2012

@Barbara....
WOOOO don't even look at the Bellcrest Mall. The last thing we need in this area is a homeless shelter. I'm assuming you don't live near the mall you mention.

Comment_arrow

.

12:02 am on Sunday, February 26, 2012

I am not afraid to admit that I don't want a homeless shelter in my area! My family has had a home since the day it was built near the Bell Crest Mall, before there even was a Bell Crest Mall and that is the last thing that area needs. I am not saying that I don't feel sorry for the homeless. We donate all of the time to the tent city in Lakewood, but most of the homeless don't want to live in a shelter, just ask the residents of tent city in Lakewood. Unfortunately, what we need is to get some business back in the Bell Crest Mall and some other empty stores to create jobs to keep people from being homeless.

TRresident

8:50 am on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

I'm pretty sure most of you commenting on how heartless the residents around the church are, were not present at the meeting with the church, and live no where close to it. Allow me to inform you that this "project" is NOT a homeless shelter. That's right, and those words are directly from the organization. It was a proposed 90 transitional housing program for single men and woman with treatment for drug addiction and psychological issues. IE, a drug rehab in the middle of a sprawling community! If you can honestly tell me you would want that in the middle of your community with your children playing near the building and a elementary school 500 yards away, then have at it. The church was smart not to oppose the will of the community and the pastor should be commended.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Fran

8:57 am on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

More a rehab center than a homeless center? Earlier comment all the more relevant...

Comment_arrow

Mike L

9:56 am on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

I had to read the story again after your statement....you stated 90 people would be housed......it said 40 to 50 people. ......And in one of the last paragraphs stated that it wasn't addressed what individuals would be housed.....maybe you have better inside knowledge. As far as other individual stating looking for other sights, route 37, I agree Route 37 would be perfect."...".especially when Walmart moves down the road, perfect size and conviences already there.

Comment_arrow

tom zoro

7:12 am on Thursday, February 23, 2012

like there's no drug use by any residents near the church already. yeah right, get your head outta the sand. informed? "high"ly doubtful

Twin Oaks Resident

9:15 am on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

You are correct TRresident. Pastor Paul should be commended on his decision, this was the wrong location. We moved to this area so that our children can play in the streets and we wouldn't have to worry about who may or may not be wandering in the residential neighborhood. There are plenty of other more suitable locations with access to public transportation and more support services for these recovering addicts.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Missy on Onyx

12:35 pm on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Twin Oaks, I mean the following not to be incidinary at all, and its with all due respect. But... where in the article did it say it would house "recovering addicts"? The pastor is talking about a shelter, not a half-way house, and I feel the definitions of those two facilities are being interchanged. We can't jumpt to conclusions and assume it will be filled with "undesireables". That attitude will cause good people with real financial problems to suffer. That being said, the criteria for those who would reside there, must similar as if they were renting an apartment. A background check, verifiable references, and verification of the circumstances that rendered them homeless. If the pastor cannot assure the community due viligence, then I must agree with you.

Comment_arrow

Twin Oaks Resident

3:49 pm on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Missy- I was at the meeting, it's a 90 day treatment program. While the church and those involved were trying their hardest to spin this as being for the homeless, no one was denying that substance abusers would be housed in the facility as well.

Comment_arrow

Reality1

8:06 pm on Friday, February 24, 2012

Most of the "clinetele" are addicts and/or criminals. They don't belong getting treatment in a residential community.

Tom Spina

9:54 am on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

I am a supporter of the Lodge at this location, but have no problem with people who are concerned. HOWEVER, the plight of the homeless in Toms River has now been brought to you. If you dont want the shelter in your neighborhood, than help us put it somewhere else. I, Like many of you, have turned our backs on the needy for too long. We are all worried about the next car, the next vacation, the next pool, what the new neighbor has, enough is enough, I along with you must change and take care of the people that live around us. Do you ever wonder why the Jewish community has no homeless, the moslim community has no homeless, even the Hispanic imigrant population is rarely homeless. Middle class white america has become very selfish and this includes me. We must change.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bob Smith

12:45 pm on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Amen, exactly my point. So many people say yes as long as it is not in my backyard. Part of the problem with this whole country is that people dont want to see the mess that we have. I think children should see it so they learn compassion early on something that is sorely missing in our society when you have all these Rabid Tea-party people wanting to cut cut cut everything till there is nothing left.

Comment_arrow

Shore Skeptic

7:47 pm on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Bob you are way off base. The TEA party is made up of people who realize that our rights come from God, not Uncle Sam. TEA party members have values and help others through volunteering and donations. The leftist, secular-progressives are the ones that favor eugenics. This is a church effort that uses ZERO tax dollars. When is the last time you saw an atheist soup kitchen, or agnostic homeless shelter?

Comment_arrow

Allen S. Tiger

3:57 pm on Friday, February 24, 2012

Bob, you really need to step back and look around you. You made remarks about an article that you really knew nothing about, and you are doing the same with your Februry 22 posting at 12:45 pm. Look at my response to your 2/22 posting. You SHOULD see a different picture. It al has to do with getting the job done right instead of trying to 'FAST TRACT' everything. You see, you are wrong the the Tea-party people want to cut cut cut -- they just want to get it right the first time. By the was, I am NOT a 'Tea-partier'

gottabeeleev

10:07 am on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Kidding me.... Wake up people The homeless are in your backyard now, and lets stop steriotyping the homeless, casue not all homeless are on drugs. Nation wide 58% of homeless are those who have lost their jobs and cant pay for rent, this Pastor wants to help the community, we should applaud him and help him!!!!!

Reply

Fran

10:25 am on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Taking care of the homeless is important regardless. These people need a hand up, not a hand out. They need to be able to get back on their feet, find their footing and be able to stay there. Some that will be a very short time, others may take longer.

Many homeless are not on drugs. But that is not what TRresident said they were saying during the actual meeting.

So which is it? If this is for any homeless, sure there will be some that are drugs, of course. But is it only for those trying to kick their drug habit like TRresident implied from the meeting?

Reply

Shelly

10:35 am on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

I think the mistake was in trying to open a "Homeless SHELTER." This has an institutional ring to it and immediately residents would oppose it, regardless of what the shelter would look like or who it would house.

If the church purchased a house or houses ( or built home-like structures ) with the intent to operate a "Group HOME or homes" for people who are without a place to live, I think the plans probably would have passed more easily. Residents may not like having a group home in their area, but they can't really discriminate against it.

Question: There are group homes & shelters in local areas and neighborhoods for disabled people and abused / homeless women. What criteria did they need to follow? Perhaps it could be something the church could look into for future plans.

I do applaud this pastor for trying to help those who are homeless. Other churches in the area would do well to reach out to him or possibly join him in this endeavor. My sister is a teacher and she said it's mind-boggling at the amount of children whose address is a car.

These people aren't druggies or derelicts. They are families who do not number in our so-called economic "recovery" because they have fallen off the grid.

Never look down your nose at someone who has fallen on hard times and is homeless. Most are NOT that way by choice. Remember: "There, but for the grace of God, go you."

For now, anyway. Life can turn on a dime.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Fran

10:59 am on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Shelly, great response. And so true.

If each and every church and secular charitable organization had a group home like this for the homeless, no one would ever need to have a 'shelter' at all.

The folks would all be in home environments that are more conducive in the first place than a 'shelter' situation.

Oh, and a listing should be handed out to every church and charitable organization so when their group home is full, they can contact one with more room to help.

TRresident

10:56 am on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Honestly tom, you really need to gather some facts and educate yourself before you comment on this particular issue. The fact is we agree that the cause is good and just. Several of us have offered our proffesional services to assist with relocating it to somewhere non residential, like the industrial park for example. Again, this was not a shelter to house families who "suddenly lost their jobs" it was intended only for SINGLE persons and to rehabilitate them. As your aware I'm sure, there are already many state services already in place to assist them. Also, do you know the stats of single persons who choose to live in the woods and refuse any assistance besides a hot meal now and then? I think you'd be surprised. As far as the enormous guilt you obviously feel for being "white middle class" I hope you eventually find a way to feel good about yourself. I'm sure most people reading this feel proud that their own hard work, positive attitudes, and self reliance and good decision making enabled them to achieve a good life for themselves..not guilt over it.

over jr.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bob Smith

12:49 pm on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Industrial Park??? Why so you dont have to see it!! This is exactly my point of what is wrong with this country. People need to see it and they need to take heed. We have a big problem in this country and its really awful. People having to live in Tent cities while the rich are ripping us all off and living high and mighty. The day may come when the homeless will have to take over because they will be the majority.

Comment_arrow

Bob Smith

12:29 am on Thursday, February 23, 2012

not nearly enough state services to help anyone. This governor has cut cut cut when it comes to the needy. When a great depression happens we need to take care of those in need.

TRresident

11:01 am on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

To Mike L: I meant to say 90 day program.. That's the maximum time someone could be in the program before they had to leave.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Twin Oaks Resident

3:58 pm on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Bob Smith- Yes, so we don't have to see it! The people in those neighborhoods bought there so that they can raise their families in a nice safe community. I don't need my kids walking by a 40 to 50 bed shelter everyday on their way to school. I am sorry that your liberal bleeding heart cannot understand this reality. What's wrong with this country is your supposition that "the day may come when the homeless will have to take over because they will be the majority". If you actually believe that to be true, what is a 40 to 50 bed shelter going to do to prevent that? You have a cradle to grave mentality and that is what will ruin and bankrupt this country.

Comment_arrow

Bob Smith

12:28 am on Thursday, February 23, 2012

Yes what is wrong with a cradle to grave mentality? It works very well in Scandinavia where people take care of people. I am so sick of all these people who say they are Christians but when it is time to help or take care of those in need they look the other way. You are talking to someone who spent 6 weeks feeding the dying in Ethiopia during the great famine there. I know what it is like to give of myself to people in need and you should too.

Comment_arrow

Shore Skeptic

6:26 am on Thursday, February 23, 2012

Bob, I'll ask you again...When is the last time you saw an atheist soup kitchen, or agnostic homeless shelter? I'm tired of Phony Christians too...like Joe Biden who only gives $369.

Marynary

12:01 pm on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

I can certainly see why taxpayers would resent this type of institution threatening security in thier family's neighborhood.

How about this?

There is a lot of vacant land around the Toms River Police Station. Get Toms River to donate this land to "The Cause" and start a campaign to get all the Toms River Houses of Worship to work together to provide construction costs for a state of the art rescue mission.
There are not a lot of residential areas behind the police station.

One last thougt I would like to congratsulate Pastor Gifford for being a truely good and caring neighbor to the folks who live near Cedar Grove & Bay. He is a smart man.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Shore Skeptic

7:54 pm on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Why build a new building? Utilize one of the many existing vacant buildings that are an eyesore in this town. The utilities are already in place.

FYI: The Presbyterian Church already has the "House of Hope" on their Chestnut St. property. They have a food pantry along with volunteers that help homebound, disabled and elderly.

barbara

12:05 pm on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

dont understand where all this is coming from. article did not state it is for drug addicts, it said homeless. I have a loved one who was living on the streets 7 months ago and for the Grace of God got into a group home in Bayville and is doing wonderful. I have other people i know who are one paycheck short of being homeless. the homeless need help. i also would like to mention that many years ago when Harbor House, a home for delinquint teens came to my former neighborhood, the community was outraged. It has been there for many years and helps alot of troubled teens. We are not talking about drug addicts here. We are talking about people who need some help.

Reply

fran

12:48 pm on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

The question is what homeless. Drugs, alchohol, economy. That has to be considered in a residential community. Not in my backyard, yeah not endagering my life and kids and nieghbors.

Reply

Browny

1:57 pm on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

First i cant believe the negativity and finger pointing at the residents of the neighborhood. I have lived there for 14 years and love it, what people dont know outside the nieghborhood is that we already have two group homes/rehabs within one block of the proposed site in homes that were sold to these groups with no notice whatsoever. The church did not bring this to the nieghbors attention until they had already submitted their plans to the board and only after some negative reaction from one neighbor who was required to be notified by law. The law states anyone within 200 feet be notified, that means one home, the other home is owned by the church, so yes in my eyes they were trying to sneek it through. I think any of you who think we in Twin Oaks are bad people you need to look in the mirror, if you had two group homes in your neighborhood already you would not want another even larger facility. We have strangers walking around constantly and busses for these people that fly down the street daily we just dont want more so offer them your nieghborhood, the house next door to you then. We as a group are not oppossed to the idea just the location and we have suggested the location on Bey Lea across from the police station, close to bus transportation, and job possibilities etc.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bob Smith

12:25 am on Thursday, February 23, 2012

sorry what about the homeless people. they are the ones in need...

Mark Wendell

4:09 pm on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

County needs to build a shelter. Good luck to the pastor and thanks for trying.

Reply

Paul Gifford

4:21 pm on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

As I have read thIs feed throughout the day I think it would be appropriate at this time to respond. This article is misleading and simply not stated correctly. I would have been more than happy to provide a detailed article about the recent developments for the TR residents. Sorry Diana that you felt the need to rush and push this story through without having the facts. The picture of the church is not even right! The community residents are to be applauded, the Lodge is to be applauded, the church is to be applauded and the homeless will get the help they need. I hope to see a follow-up article soon! Humbly, Pastor Paul!

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Catherine Galioto

4:44 pm on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

We'll correct whatever is incorrect. We'll continue our follow up articles since reporting on the forum last year. I've added a new photo and removed the incorrect one. Thank you.

Comment_arrow

Concerned

9:11 pm on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Some comments made about people voicing concerns on this board have ranged from Racist to Judgmental and most have been unfair at best in my opinion.. A spirited debate on this issue is not only necessary but should be encouraged and I applaud your willingness to engage in this type of discussion, I suggest you research further and continue forward in your pursuit until either you achieve the vision or God removes it from your heart.

It appears this issue is very dear to you and possibly of a personal nature as well as professional, my experience in business and life has provided knowledge that this combination usually has the most successful outcomes. So realize this is just one battle down a road of may to come and I know God has provided you the heart, it just remains to be seen if God has issued you the tools needed as well..

Comment_arrow

Concerned

9:11 pm on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Pastor Paul Gifford,

I applaud your conviction in pursuing this goal and vision that has been placed upon your heart. The details in achieving a proper execution to your goal appear to be lacking and the major concern to many involved at the meeting. Attempting a feat such as the one you have placed before the community is one of monumental proportion to say the least and would take considerable resources and a skilled labor force. For example, medical, counseling, nursing, security and a competent staff in general are all necessary, I have searched the general area and found a working shelter for comparison called King of Kings to base my assumption. King of Kings maybe a model worth considering and/or an association you might consider bonding with in your attempted venture.

Comment_arrow

Allen S. Tiger

6:02 pm on Friday, February 24, 2012

Very well said, Pastor Paul! This is my first time on this web site, and I have to say I am disappointed. I thought this article was very misleading. I have replied to many of the blogs personally, to try to correct what the article leads you to believe, and I have already had some feedback. Unfortunately, some of the feedback comes from those afraid to put their true name to the garbage they wrote after reading the article.

barbara

4:35 pm on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Pastor Paul, I have just read your comment and have been following this story all day long. It is sad that the reporter, Diana did not get her facts straight. I would love to hear your detailed story. I know, the church picture is not correct. I have passed that church many times in many years. I no longer live in that area, but still have a house there close by. Was it really meant for drug addicts or homeless poeple? I strongly think that addicts do need a place to go besides jail. They are all not criminals and I would not want them in my backyard either. They do need help and i feel the courts should force mandatory rehab. for them. There are many homeless people who are not addicts who also need help. No, i was not at the meeting. I am just upset that this reporter did not get her facts straight. Yes, the community, Lodge and Church is to be applauded. I also hope the homeless get the help they need. Looking forward to the follow up article, but perhaps you should publish it? Maybe then we will get the true story and facts. Keep up the good work, Pastor!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Allen S. Tiger

5:43 pm on Sunday, February 26, 2012

Hi Barbara
I've been reading through all the blogs and see that you are now in a fencing match with tweetiexx. Do yourself a favor and forget about tweetiexx. She is obviously a nut job. Her 'involvement' in this issue is obviously just for kicks. She shows her own stupidity by calling others names and mocking others that she disagrees with. This is truly juvenile, if not actually infantile. Instead of acting like an intelligent adult and taking sides to an issue in a grown-up manner, she needs to create this confrontational ambiance. Just read her trash and you can see it for yourself. Enough said!

Paul Gifford

4:47 pm on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

@ Barbara; email me at - believin4revival@verizon.net and I'll follow through with a response.

Reply

Mapleleafnj

6:31 pm on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

SO it looks like the whole thing was handled perfectly. The people most impacted were asked and the action the people wanted was done.
Why is this so hard for anyone to handle?
If your so upset about it, go find another social project to bring your signs and slogans to.. This one is in the books.
Hat off to the Pastor, guess he lives in the neighborhood too.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bob Smith

12:24 am on Thursday, February 23, 2012

what? what about the homeless people.. Your forgot that part of the equation.

Eddie

9:15 pm on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

All but for the GRACE of God, some of you Naysayers could be Homeless in this wacky economy. I hope that none of you are ever put in that position. As I said in my previous statement, some of the homeless have other problems. We have to start somewhere. Another comment made about it NOT being close to Rt 37 or the Ocean Ride Bus. If you look on the Map, the Church is in walking distance of the Ocean County Mall, and I am positive that the County Government would alter the Ocean Ride bus routes to help the people. Also I was not at the meeting, but I read the article and did not see any mention of a Drug Program. BUT, with illegal drug abuse which is rampant in this country and the root of many cases of criminal activity. In case you don't realize it, we have drug program buildings all over the county and most people don't even know that they are there. One other thing, GOD BLESS the Pastor and the Congregation for attempting to do the right thing.

Reply

tweetiexx

2:16 am on Friday, February 24, 2012

Every one of you that in support of this homeless shelter or whatever their calling it, if this was proposed in your back yard, your tune would change drastically!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Allen S. Tiger

4:10 pm on Friday, February 24, 2012

tweetiexx, Your comment is basically wrong. Your response should have been to tell the people in support of the project that is has nothing to do with the 'in your back yard' mind set - it has to do with finding the proper location for a worthy cause. THE LODGE took advantage of a generous Pastor and Church to try to "Fast track" something that truly cannot be done 'over night'! And for those who might be following my blogs on this matter -- I do NOT belong to this Church, but after personally sitting down with Pastor Paul, I have the deepest respect for the man. I can only presume that he was totally embarrassed by the org that he has chosen to support and partner with for a very worthy cause.

Comment_arrow

tweetiexx

4:53 pm on Friday, February 24, 2012

@Allen S. Tiger

Firstly..My comment is CORRECT, like it or not.

Secondly..Nobody took advantage of this pastor. He knew full well exactly what he was stepping into. But If thats thats the way you wish to spin it, oh well. While your at it...stop posting. You sound dsperate and ridicilious and we all heard enough of your dribble.

Comment_arrow

Allen S. Tiger

5:55 pm on Friday, February 24, 2012

Hi Tweetiexx
Thanks for the reply! Don't know where you live, but I bet it is not in my community. I bet you didn't go to the meeting, either! You really should clean up your own act before accusing others of sounding desparate and ridiculous! I was there! I know what went on, and I now know Pastor Paul. Like I said, your are very very mistaken on this one! By the way, I find it quite amusing that you hide behind such a cute name. Reguardless of what side of an issue you choose to be on, you should have the guts to put your real name to it.

Carol Aller

12:25 pm on Friday, February 24, 2012

I'm glad to hear that at least someone is trying to picking up the ball regarding this very important problem. I do however think there are better locations in town that would have transportation and other services available. My questions is...where does the town of Toms River stand on this issue? What are they doing about this, hmmmm???

Reply

Allen S. Tiger

4:25 pm on Friday, February 24, 2012

This article has one major 'mis-quote' and is putting words in the mouth of the Pastor. I attended the meeting and I have spoken to the Pastor, both by written correspondence as well as a face-to-face sit-down in his office. You have quote around the phrase "but they just didn't want it in their back yard' which tells the reader that these were the Pastor's words. While I am sure what he said certainly would have portrayed those words, I do not believe the Pastor would have made a direct statement like that.

Reply

barbara

5:29 pm on Friday, February 24, 2012

tweetie, i no longer live near the bellcrest mall, but do have a home there and know the area very well. i was just trying to make a point that there are alot of empty stores and buildings in the area.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Allen S. Tiger

6:09 pm on Friday, February 24, 2012

Hey Barb,
Don't waste your time on Tweetiexx. Granted, you didn't use your full name like I have chosen to do, but anyone who hides behind a cute name like tweetiexx really isn't with the program, and does not deserve a resopnse.

Comment_arrow

Reality1

7:59 pm on Friday, February 24, 2012

Who cares what you say, Allen S. Tiger. You're comments don't weigh anymore than someone with an anonymous handle. Maybe the people with anonymous names don't want to be harasssed by the creeps that the Pastor wants to bring into the middle of a HUGE residential community.

barbara

6:33 pm on Friday, February 24, 2012

I hear you Allen. I want all to know that although i am not part of this discussion much, i am following it closely. I received a personal emal from the Pastor and I wish him much success in getting this program off the ground.

Reply

Reality1

8:03 pm on Friday, February 24, 2012

Go down "to the mission" on Bacharach Boulevard in Atlantic City and check out the derelicts that call that dump their home. They are drunks, drug addicts, kid touchers and criminals. Most of them exploit the good deeds of "the mission". Most of them need to be institutionalized because their crazy, or jailed because they are criminals.
Is this Pastor for real? In the middle of a HUGE residential community?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bob Smith

12:18 am on Sunday, February 26, 2012

The derelicts as you call them are still human beings or have you forgotten that. Where is the compassion gone? people are so self centered... You never know what the future holds and all of you people who are against this shelter could be the one who need shelter.

barbara

10:45 am on Sunday, February 26, 2012

Very well said, Bob. Reading back on your previous comment, i want to applaud you for helping the starving people in Ethiopia. I received via my e-mail 3 horrible comments from Reality 1, which Patch did not post and I am glad they did not. It is funny how Reality 1 all of a sudden gets in on this converation, when Allen Tiger puts tweety bird in place. Coincidence? LOL anyway, the Pastor explained to me via email the plans for this project and the eligibility requirements. People really know to need the facts before they judge this Pastor. I so wish his program gets off the ground. it is not a homeless program for sure, it is a program for people who need help. If it ever opens and is located close to me i would definitely consider volunteering. Hats off to the Pastor!

Reply

tweetiexx

11:37 am on Sunday, February 26, 2012

@Barbara...Oh boy do you have a vivid imagination. No moron put me in my place; your giving that crackpot Allen S. Tiger too much credit. Also there is NO WAY anyone sent you an email especially since there is no way to get your email unless YOU published it. Now that I'm aware of this deplorable situation I will make it a point to be at all town council meetings with all my friends, family and neighbors to make sure these types of facilities are NEVER opened in Toms River. This "pastor" can take them all home with him. Matter of fact lets send a few home with YOU.

Reply
Comment_arrow

barbara

3:03 pm on Sunday, February 26, 2012

no moron has to put you in your place. geesh......u are a moron.

barbara

12:26 pm on Sunday, February 26, 2012

yes, tweetie i did get an email from the pastor. see above comments where he asked for my address. he laid out all the truthful details to me. You should not put down the pastor and community till you know the facts. enough said......as a matter of fact, i would welcome anyone in my home for a hot meal. geesh. do the community a favor and dont attend the next meeting if there is one, cause obviously your are closed minded. enough. i will not reply to any more of your posts.

Reply

tweetiexx

12:36 pm on Sunday, February 26, 2012

"I received via my e-mail 3 horrible comments from Reality 1," did you forgot what you've written? Dementia setting in? Believe me, me and all my friends and neighbors will be at any and ALL town council & freeholder meetings to make sure our quality of life is kept to a high standard. That mean NO HOMELESS SHELTERS IN TOMS RIVER. You may call it "closed minded" I call it preserving the Toms River quality of life. I promise I will not shed a tear if you don't answer my posts.....LOL

Reply
Comment_arrow

barbara

3:05 pm on Sunday, February 26, 2012

only one word and i am done - moron!

Mark Wendell

1:21 pm on Sunday, February 26, 2012

I certainly never would wish someone being homeless but after standing by and watching this I'm changing my mind. To blatantly sit there and rip into people who are homeless calling all homeless drug users, kid touchers or other things in disgusting. It amazes me that people will move into Ocean County from up North and move behind a Foodtown and don't think that will lower their home values but having a small shelter at an church will. To sit there and say that you will attend every township committee meeting and say that you will make sure that NO homeless shelter will be anywhere in Toms River at all is disgusting. You say this is to "protect" YOUR neighborhoods but now your "protecting" the whole town. Anyone who thinks the woods camps are just in Lakewood and that they are not all ready in the woods along your neighborhoods is dreaming. Better not to see the problem? Tea Party values at work.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bob Smith

2:32 pm on Sunday, February 26, 2012

its is really sad to read such things. You really have to wonder what moral fabric if any some of these people have.

Comment_arrow

Mark Wendell

2:52 pm on Sunday, February 26, 2012

Bob Smith--- You are right. One would think that having a church in your neighborhood with a committed pastor that helps its neighbors would be an asset to the community and not hurt but maybe help property values. In other areas of this country they have government run shelters all over. I salute this pastor for trying to do good work and help those who need it and for bringing attention to this problem. I wish him good luck in this endeavor. Maybe more house's of worship no matter its religion can come together work with Ocean Counties local governments and pool resource's and knowledge and get something done. I think moving the homeless out of the area and away from jobs is not going to help the problem one bit.

Comment_arrow

barbara

2:55 pm on Sunday, February 26, 2012

so agree, Mark. i remember when Harbor House came to our neighborhood and all residents were concerned about their property value. did no affect it. harbor house is a safehaven for these kids with problems. i agree, the posts that were delted were disgusting, and if these people from up north coming here dont like it, well they should stay up north. they dont know the facts. it is not a homeless shelter. no, the woods are not in lakewood, they are also in toms river. i remember a guy, kids always called him "space man" i belive (or if not correct name maybe i have dementia) who lived in the wood for many years off garfield ave. if these "people" and their friends go to next meeting, i certainly hope there is security there to throw their butts out. sickens me.

Comment_arrow

barbara

3:08 pm on Sunday, February 26, 2012

i agree Mark......dont even think this issue is on the agenda for township agenda..........geesh........maybe these northerners who have no compassion should have stayed up north.......loved ur commet.

tweetiexx

1:46 pm on Sunday, February 26, 2012

@Mark Wendell

Take them home with you. I'm sorry if I offended anyone but quality of life is important for us Toms River citizens. If they want to live in the woods, so be it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bob Smith

2:32 pm on Sunday, February 26, 2012

your what one would call a very selfish introspective person who only cares about what you want and not the needs of others. Well if the whole country is going this route then we really are going to hell... lock stock and barrel

Comment_arrow

Mark Wendell

2:35 pm on Sunday, February 26, 2012

No one knows if any property values would be affected one bit. Take them home with me? a comment like that solves nothing and shows what kind of person you are. Do you think they want to live in the woods in Lakewood, the woods next to Friendly's on RT37, the woods next to the OTB on RT 37, the woods next to the GSP on Lakehurst Road. What does having people living in the woods do to property values they are already all around you. We have families living in there cars while their old homes sit there rotting in neighborhoods all over Ocean County. What does that do to you property values?

barbara

3:12 pm on Sunday, February 26, 2012

so true mark, show what kind person she is..... i would galdly have a homeless person in my home for an nice bowl of macaroni........lol

Reply

Mark Wendell

3:45 pm on Sunday, February 26, 2012

barbara, Thank You. Growing up we had a few homeless Korea and Vietnam vets living in or around my town. We also had names that we called them like plastic bag man and mister Jamesway. Some of them showed up at the Little League games and wandered over to the concession stand were they used the money they got from handouts to get coffee or hot dogs. They never bothered anyone or touched kids to my knowledge. They were always treated with respect and were given the handouts without asking for them. I always felt bad for them but I was always told that they were sick and refused help and wanted to stay in the woods or under the bridge on RT 9 that some of them stayed. I remember taking some provisions to them when I was in HS and the guy I went over to was more interested in the plastic bags we had than the food and soap. The township of Lakewood gave them a warm shower now and again. It was sad but without mental health help they were going no where. This has changed for the most part. Families are homeless because of the economy, working people lost their homes, People lost the jobs they had because of no fault of their own. Some in the mix because of drugs? I'm sure there are but they need help to. To say that they are all there in the woods because they are drug users or child molesters is unreal and shows a total lack of knowledge regarding the current homeless problem. If they think there is no drugs in the neighborhood already.................

Reply

barbara

8:42 pm on Sunday, February 26, 2012

thanks mark, allen and bob. you are true people and good people, just like me. we have feelings. SHE is so uncompassionat.......will try to not feed into her negativeness. I live in a community where alot of older people need help. I take care of my neighboors. Even if it is just bringing them a container of chicken soup or macaroni, it makes me feel good. No, they are not homeless, but they are alone. i try help all when i can and gives me a great feeling of self worth..

Reply

Mark Wendell

9:28 pm on Sunday, February 26, 2012

Barbra, winters can be tough on people who are older and alone even with a roof over their head. You never know if their heat is on or if they have been able to get food or needed medicines. You go and feel good and keep working. The little things that you do can mean a world of difference to someone in need even if its some warm soup and friendship on a cold day. I saw drivers yelling at a man who stands near the new Shop Rite in Toms River on RT 166 with a sign that I can never quite read but I think it says something like "Homeless will work for food". Yelling at people who will work for food, isn't that what the hard people always say? Get a job! That's what this guy is trying to do and they still yell.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mattie

7:42 am on Monday, February 27, 2012

I saw that man for the very first time just last week, Mark. I came around the jug handle to cross over Rt 37 and drive up 166 towards the new Shop-Rite entrance when I realized he was standing on the curb there- leaning up on a road sign not 8 ft from me at the red light. I was surprised at how young he was-- this was no "crazy guy" with scraggly beard or wild eyes. This was a young man no more than maybe 30, standing still as a statue with a look of desperation and depression on his face. He did not make eye contact, and he was not actively "begging" for money or handouts. He simply held his sign, and smoked his cigarette and looked cold and uncomfortable. That's a pretty long red light, and believe me, except for blinking his eyes and seeing his breath in the bitter cold air, he didn't move a muscle. I had absolutely no cash on me at all, or I would have given him some money.... it was a sight that stayed with me all day. I would have been unbelievably appalled had I heard anyone yelling at him or abusing him in any way! There would have been a throw down at that light had that happened! People are so twisted and mean spirited sometimes

Mattie

8:06 am on Monday, February 27, 2012

maybe someone GAVE him some cigarettes, you dolt. I knew the second I typed "smoking his cigarette" some ahole would jump on that and criticize. Here's a fact for you... assume someone gave him the cigarette or a few cigarettes.... did you know smoking cigarettes will temporarily kill hunger pains and pangs? Yes, it does. Ask any pretty, very skinny, well paid model or ballerina.... and by the way, this guy was also pretty darn thin. Want to assume now he was a junkie too? Loser.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Project Bluebeam

8:15 am on Monday, February 27, 2012

Ballerinas wouldn't be ale to perform if they were coughing and wheezing all the time. And how many "well-paid models" have tobacco-stained teeth?

Comment_arrow

Mark Wendell

8:15 am on Monday, February 27, 2012

Mattie, I have seen him a few times. He was standing like you say very still and it was a pouring rain and the ink on his sign was running down.

Comment_arrow

Mattie

12:13 pm on Monday, February 27, 2012

Bluebeam, you don't get out (from under your rock) much, do you?
Coffee & cigarettes is the well known (infamous) diet of many anorexics, and those who go to great lengths not to eat often or much - for whatever reason. I've known both models and ballet dancers in my time and smoking was an aid for them and many of their friends in the business. Contrary to what you might believe, Bluebeam, you don't have a clue.

Ally McBeal

5:03 am on Sunday, May 27, 2012

The neighborhood is entitled to its opinion. Its not selfish to want to protect what you value and care for, like your family and its safety. My idiot friend, when he was down on his luck, finally invited into his house the homeless guy that had been sleeping in his backyard. Not a night went by that money wasn't disappearing from his wallet, despite the fact that my friend would give this guy money and smokes, fed him, and allowed him a place to sleep. Wasn't good enough.

Then, homeless guy starts bringing his 'street employed' 'girlfriends' around. Next thing I hear, there's any amount of drug use and bizarre behaviors going on. And money continually disappearing. And more acquaintances of acquaintances showing up where they know there's money and food, and a submissive, passive individual who won't prosecute anyone. When he would attempt to confront individuals about his missing money and other things, he was subsequently beaten up and has suffered concussions 3 different times. This is the joys of doing what some consider the Lord's work and bringing a homeless individual under your wing in trying to help. They are desperate and you cannot fix them.

Reply

Carol Aller

2:45 pm on Sunday, May 27, 2012

I agree the township needs to get on this. It is way past time. Not all homeless people are druggies and derelicts....some are children, mothers; families that have been left homeless through no fault of their own. It is on the rise and if a shelter of some kind IS in a church, it would not be like the "mission" in Atlantic City. The two aren't even comparable. I agree the location is not idea transportation wise, but that's ALL. "There but for the grace of God, go I." We need to remember that.

Reply
Comment_arrow

barbara

2:50 pm on Sunday, May 27, 2012

well said carol......i agree. know someone who is going thru this right now. single mom, sad, can't get help. oh by the way, there are two barbaras on here. i will call myself barb 1.

Wanda Jones

2:33 pm on Sunday, December 16, 2012

"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.'(John 3:16) "For even the Son of man came not to be ministered unto, but to minister, and to give his life a ransom for many."(Mark 10:45) Psa.50:12 says for the world is mine, and the fulness thereof. God says all of it belongs to Him, we own nothing. God says, the earth is His's. He said, "The heaven is My throne, and the earth is My foot-stool: where is the house that ye build unto Me? and where is the place of My rest"? For all those things hath Mine hand made, and all those things have been, Saith the Lord. We may not agree on all things. But what we can all agree on is that all humans have their opinion right/wrong and we all do not have to agree but we should be able to respect one another. Because at the end of the day we all feel as though we are good people but in all actualality we all fall short their are no 100% humans on the planet. There's room enough for all of us to grow. at the end of the day all we need is LOVE nothing speaks louder than /stonger than/powerful than/harder than is Love. We can agree to disagree without being disrespectful. Our children do as we do not as we say. Anybody can hate or be nasty, or mean but it takes guts to love the un loveable. name calling, belittling, bite biting, tearing/pulling down one another take so much work. hurt folk, hurts folk we can get our point across without being nasty

Reply

Leave a comment

 

The Toms River Patch
Valentine's Shopping Guide

See the full guide!

Patch Picks