patching...
Breaking: Toms River Confirms Memorial Day Weekend Opening for Ortley Beach »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Flood Maps Could Alter Shoreline 'Considerably' and at 'Unimaginable' Cost, Mayor Says

Mayor Thomas Kelaher responds to Gov. Chris Christie's announcement that the state has adopted FEMA flood maps

 

The state's adoption Thursday of the current Advisory Base Flood Elevation maps issued by the Federal Emergency Management Agency could change Toms River's shoreline, and at a high cost, Mayor Thomas Kelaher said. 

"The Governor’s action assures us that our residents will remain eligible for FEMA funding, but in our township, we could see up to 10,000 homes needing to be raised," Kelaher said in a statement issued Thursday night. "This will change the look of our shoreline considerably and the cost is unimaginable."

The advisory maps, or ABFE's, were released in December and recommend that residents in flood zones in 10 counties and 194 communities raise their homes on average between 1 and 5 feet. Based on a scientific analysis of recent and past storms, the flood maps estimate the kind of flooding various zones can expect during a once-a-century storm, like Hurricane Sandy.

It's anticipated that the advisory maps will be adopted by FEMA as its new flood insurance maps. While the new maps - and new insurance rates - won't become official for anywhere between 18 and 24 months, conforming to the standards of the advisory maps is necessary when it comes to rebuilding, Christie said.

"The issue that the township has with this announcement is that we believe that significant portions of the township mainland and portions of the barrier island are in the wrong flood designation V vs. an A zone," Council President George Wittmann said in a statement Friday morning. "This will force homeowners to wait until August until the maps are released to see if the zone changes back to an A zone."

Wittmann has indicated that the state's adoption of the maps could become a financial burden to residents trying to rebuild if they are changed upon final release in August.

"If they move ahead they could potentially spend $20-30 thousand more to construct a foundation system that complies with the V zone requirement," he said.

The Township Council, which has disputed the classifications on the now-adopted maps, this week passed a resolution opposing the documents. 

"The maps really created more questions than they did answers," Kelaher said during the the Tuesday night meeting when the resolution was passed. 

"Our Township Engineer sees extensive flaws in the mapping, especially where it relates to the Velocity zone on the mainland, and not planning high enough on the barrier island," Kelaher said in a statement Thursday night. The engineer, Bob Chankalian, has written to FEMA and, along with Kelaher and other township representatives, met with FEMA officials on Wednesday.

FEMA representatives said that the agency will examine the velocity zone designations that are in question. The mainland velocity zone may be reduced when the next round of maps are released, according to the township, but FEMA could not yet commit to that change. 

FEMA also said that it is "highly likely" that the sections of barrier island not in the velocity zone will likely end up in that zone when revised maps are released in August, according to the township. 

Christie said the state is adopting the flood maps as is, though he encouraged property owners in affected flood zones to build higher, if possible. Should FEMA determine that its advisory maps are too high in some areas, it will only benefit property owners by having buildings that are safer and more resilient to future storms, Christie said. 

More information about the governor's announcement and how insurance rates may be affected is available here

About this column: News and essential information about Hurricane Sandy in New Jersey. Related Topics: Advisory Base Flood Elevation maps, FEMA, Hurricane Sandy, and toms river township council

Anthony Tremarco

12:50 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013

So basically ALL homes must be raised regardless of the damage. Yes the shore will be altered, it will be a barren wasteland because people cannot afford this extra cost.

Reply
Comment_arrow

foggyworld

7:02 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

It's worse than that. Those of us who did build on 10' high pilings that kept our homes snug and dry are now being told that Fema will insist that we raise those houses that worked like a charm and put two or three more feet of piling height under our dry homes. Sure.

This is obviously a plan to remove all people from coastal areas at the price of financially ruining thousands of families who believe me will not move on to another corner of New Jersey. Folks on the western coast of Barnegat Bay may not be millionaires but we sure are heavy duty tax payers who if all goes according to Fema, will soon be paying those tax monies to another, better run State.

Where IS that Governor who gave away all of his powers to one of the least effective federal agencies which is very busy ruining not just our lives but quite possibly his chances of being re-elected. It was Monmouth and Ocean Counties that threw him over the top first go round and whoever those poll takers of his are that say he has a 74% approval rating, are out of their birds or just didn't bother to connect with we who are getting used to being neglected. We will stay here long enough to vote, however.

Oops, gotta go. Someone's at the door working for Christie's re-election and I don't want to miss this. It isn't Christie himself though because he views himself as being above the fray.

Dlb

1:01 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013

What do people who's homes are on slabs and can't be raised and who can't afford exorbitant insurance rates to do? We have lived in this home over 30 years with no problem. We won't be able to sell and we won't be able to live there. Do we have to just walk away from the only home our family knows??? Please put some sense in what is happening!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

VoiceofReason

1:25 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013

Clear it out, burn it down, collect. - Seems to be the only solution anymore. This is getting out of control. The barrier island may as well just be removed from existance if they think people can afford $20-$30k more

Comment_arrow

Log Jam

6:29 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013

$20-30,OOO to raise the home HA!. Yea, good luck with that. First try and see how long it takes to even get someone out to your home to give you an estimate. Then wait until you see how long the wait is! Now back to the good part. I was able to get a rough estimate for my modest home in Silverton. $65,000 to raise my modest home with everything.Please this is a joke,

JB08753

1:16 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013

So let me get this straight. According to the FEMA and Christie, I now live in an area that has a chance of flooding 8 feet 26% of the time over a 30 year mortgage. So that comes down to a storm every 7.5 yrs or so. So why are they all still calling this storm "a once in a century storm" then? Now this is based off the wording used from FEMA's own website for zone a & z.

Makes you wonder who is getting that next board of directors job that is getting ready to open up due to the crappy response the insurance companies have had over this.....

Reply

Floodgate

1:17 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013

Plus insane height requirements 3' to 7' higher than sandy flooded on inland lagoons , its so obvious they are off and it will come at a cost to us....

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mary Ann

2:17 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013

Helllo Floodgate, I agree with you. This does not make any sense. We live in a backbay area and our home flooded during Sandy. Never was a flood claim on our home since it was build in "55. I know things have to change though. All my neighbors in newer homes build to current codes did not flood except for garages and crawlspaces, but to change our flood designation to V from A is overkill. Especially when areas along the barrier islands are only A. Last time I looked they are directly in front of the ocean and waves are in their front yards. There is something seriously wrong here! Sorry, but my home probably would not have flooded at all if the dunes along the ocean were built as they should have been in the first place! Now the homeowners along the backbay are being penalized for that shortsighted and selfish decision to maintain the view of a privileged few along oceanfront communities. Their flood map designation is lower than ours now? Now Did anyone in the governor's office even look at these proposed flood maps?

Comment_arrow

Michelle Blamble

4:55 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013

Hey Mary Ann - I don't know whether or not you should be V but why don't you stop throwing your neighbors under the bus. Seriously, for years the mainland has lived off our property taxes and now even the town paid engineer basically trades us in exchange for the mainland. Have you given any thought that maybe the TR government should have spent some of those property taxes improving (or even just building some) dunes.

Declan Connolly

1:17 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013

We get the government we deserve.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mary Ann

1:53 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013

Sorry to have to agree with you, Declan. Every year we re-elect all the incumbents no matter what they have done or have not accomplished. Sometimes for 30 or 40 years! It's our own faults when it comes down to it.

JOHN SILVA

1:46 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013

How about building flood dams at the inlets....Would,nt that be a less expensive option...

Reply
Comment_arrow

wookfish

5:56 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013

the surge came OVER the island, not through the inlets....wow product of public school ,eh?

1stcav

2:15 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013

10 cents on the dollar for your land & ONLY the big Hotels can afford to build..Then all of a sudden gameling will be OK'd for the Sandy era Barrier Island Casino/Hotels brought to you by the connected GOP in OC & Wash. DC mega rich..

Reply
Comment_arrow

Chief Wahoo

2:18 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013

so you now you are agreeing with what i said for the past 2 months ????

Comment_arrow

1stcav

10:18 am on Saturday, January 26, 2013

Cheif: I also said: It's going back to the "have & the havenotts" only the rich will have the Ocean view , just like they wanted all along...get off my BEACH , I can't see my ocean with you all on my land !

Comment_arrow

foggyworld

7:16 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

It looks more like 2 cents on the dollar and those folks you are referring to are the one percenters for whom this world apparently turns.

Floodgate

2:25 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013

There are areas in the barrier island that have lower abfes than me by 2 to 3 feet and im 5 or 6 houses away from the dead end of the lagoon ........the maps are inaccurate ,everyone knows that.....

Reply
Comment_arrow

Chief Wahoo

2:39 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013

which means they will just screw EVERYONE , in August.....christie just decided he was desperate for money and would get the screwing starting in January

Floodgate

2:43 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013

I think he has a plan ,accept the maps to get the funding for people who need it then he or someone else will fight over the ridiculousness of them when they go preliminary

Reply
Comment_arrow

foggyworld

7:23 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

Trouble is that that thinking is faulty. Both the State and federal governments are bankrupt for starters and people in need are getting close to nothing The dollars that have come in have gone right to the county and town officials who are not spreading any of it to the folks really in need in case you haven't noticed.

It looks more like Christie realized this would mean a ton of work for him and he needed his time to campaign for not one but two elections so he happily tossed his workload onto the laps of Fema. Either the Governor is beyond naive or he is one big con who is focused oh his own personal career and could care less about finding clever ways to get funding for people who he obviously is willing to write off

Back to California he will go to raise the next $2 million for his campaign - not for the people in need at all.

Michael Capo

3:33 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013

Why would the town engineer ask FEMA to make Ortley a zone V. He did that in his letter, I read it and I asked the Mayor and Maruca how that helps Ortley. I get NO ANSWERS.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Michelle Blamble

4:58 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013

Good question. Hey, why doesn't some intrepid reporter ask him that? That's right, we don't have a press anymore interested in questioning those in power.

Comment_arrow

Kim Gloede Burns

9:40 pm on Monday, January 28, 2013

WHY? Because the mainland is planning to throw the barrier island under the bus to get what they want/need. Let's see what gets changed... if anything, it will benefit Toms River, not Ortley

Comment_arrow

foggyworld

7:24 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

It's a waste of energy to ask civil "servants" for answers. The solution is to try to stick it out long enough to vote these people out for their failing performances.

Deep Throat

4:25 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013

So does this mean that every home, damaged or not in zones A and V have to be raised? I like most people are more confused now then we were before.

Reply
Comment_arrow

foggyworld

7:27 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

We are being intentionally confused so that the time to appeal these insane map errors and proposed building code changes elapses and turns Fema's horrible work into law written into concrete. The clock is ticking right now....

letsgetreal

5:24 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013

Sadly if your in a A or V zone it seems like the houses need to be raised (though not mandated) its recommneded. Keep in mind if you dont raise your home then your subject to what I believe the Gov said in an article I read on here up to $31,000 a year (the extreme i am assuming) for flood insurance. If you raise it lowers to 7,000 a year for coverage and if you go two feet above the standard suggestion then you cut that 7000 in half...even so we are all screwed....time to walk away...it seems

Reply
Comment_arrow

foggyworld

7:35 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

OK, I'm on ten foot pilings on three feet of water on the western side of the Bay and my house remained dry. That wasn't good enough for fema: in order to avoid having to pay $2500 a MONTH in flood insurance, we would have to raise this house another three feet. They can't justify that one at all because the three houses in this area that are on pilings made it through the storm and stayed dry. The highest water mark I could find on our breakaway wall was about a foot high by one of the vents made to push the water to an outdoor drainage system that moved the liquid to the sewer. So that fleeting one foot mark now requires us to really structurally endanger this house that was built to outer Banks North Carolina building codes in 1998. They worked just fine but only Fema finds fault with this complex system that we foolishly invested in.

But to fight them means to hire a lawyer or two and an engineer. For what? To stay in this mismanaged (I'm being polite) State? No. There are other places that do try to work with the citizens who float the bills. Never going to happen in the Garden State where self interest rules and all power is taken from the people.

Eric Birchler

6:17 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013

I wish Gov Christie would tell us what he will be doing with the Governors Mansion in IBSP?
Will he be raising the GM to conform to the new FEMA BAFE and to the new V Zone standards? (He gets paid to make decisions) please decide. (His words)

Reply
Comment_arrow

1stcav

10:24 am on Saturday, January 26, 2013

He should care ?? It's NOT coming out of THE Christie Budjet the tax payers pay for WHATEVER is needed or deamed ..needed, by those incharge who answer to ,NO one..on IBSP land....Christie IS the HNIC...period !!!

Comment_arrow

foggyworld

7:41 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

You misunderstand the lifestyle of the rich and famous. The Governor will never shell out a single dime to either repair or replace his summer mansion. I have been looking for a frontal view of that place and surprise can't find one on the internet. I have seen the house from the back but you can't determine from that view if that house is or is not on pilings. I do believe he has a helicopter pad so that might have to be redesigned upwards.

But you have to understand that he couldn't care less because he expects you and me to take care of things for him and I'm sure the construction folks involved will clean up any problems the mansion sustained way before Memorial Day. So the Governor will be just fine. It's the rest of us who won't be.

Tonysoprano_62

6:30 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013

Let’s call it what it is… A TAX. It is a tax on people who had the good sense to get flood insurance and unfortunately had the audacity to put in a claim. Now the “house” (Insurance Companies) want their money back. They are locking the doors to the casino, raising the table limits, adding a few decks to shuffle and forcing you to sit down and play until they get every penny back and then some.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Chief Wahoo

6:47 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013

not in Christie talk.......tolls and fees and premiums ARE NOT A TAX.....and most sheep believe him......of course until they are broke and homeless

Comment_arrow

foggyworld

7:42 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

Those casinos have a very long wait. And this State is tanking.

Floodgate

6:41 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013

Why is new Jersey the only state listed with new abfe's on the maps? Why isn't new york dealing with this, and for that Matter why is no other state show any concerns over Fema's new flood premiums? Is Jersey the Guinea pig for this ? Are we the only state that got hit by sandy?

Reply
Comment_arrow

foggyworld

7:46 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

It seems the other governors involved have actually rolled up their sleeves and dug into the mess and as a result they are protecting their citizens and their own turf. We got hit by more than Sandy: we got hit by our Governor who thought he was moving on and up to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue and would give his work to Fema which has never, ever earned more than a D+ for its so called "efforts."

Emmy

12:55 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

So, after Sandy devastated the Jersey Shore (prime property), FEMA makes new flood plane elevation maps. Gov Christie adopts it for the state. One major storm in the last how many years? Makes you wonder how many times FEMA changed the flood maps after the Passaic River flooded. Guess that is not prime real estate up there. Also makes you wonder if government agencies are making the most of a bad situation.

Reply
Comment_arrow

foggyworld

7:47 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

From what I have read, Fema ignored our maps for 30 years and is now just putting this insanity together because Christie is enabling them.

Sue

12:55 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

If all the dunes are built (ending the ocean views of a privileged few) and beaches are replenished, 1000s of bayside and mainland homes won't be in extreme flood zones, ending the need for extreme elevations of their houses. However, the privileged few "rule." They get their way, thanks to their lawyers and campaign donations. We "little people" will have to sell or abandon our homes, making way for the moneyed class and more McMansions.

Reply

Sue

12:55 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

If all the dunes are built (ending the ocean views of a privileged few) and beaches are replenished, 1000s of bayside and mainland homes won't be in extreme flood zones, ending the need for extreme elevations of their houses. However, the privileged few "rule." They get their way, thanks to their lawyers and campaign donations. We "little people" will have to sell or abandon our homes, making way for the moneyed class and more McMansions.

Reply

Tonysoprano_62

7:52 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013

“Water seeks its own level,” as quoted sadly may be the most disturbing truth right now. Other than getting houses, cars and other debris out of the bay for fishing, boating and bathing pleasure there is little sense for further dredging. As popular as it sounds it will do little to decrease the likelihood of flooding. The only way to stop the flooding would be to limit the amount of water that actually enters the bay. The bays are being fed by the Atlantic Ocean lest we forget. We may in fact have to raise our homes but we don’t need a fist to the podium and a mandate backed up with a threat. We need a roadmap and some reassurances that we can do this and our representatives have our backs or perhaps take the lead.

Reply
Comment_arrow

fed up and soon to be broke in seaside

7:34 am on Saturday, January 26, 2013

the flooding is mainly coninuou problem because of over development in the watershed. the rain comes, the water goes to bay fast and backs up into my house. month after month this has happened and will continue. i was ready to raise my house next week and now the chanhe in the law. im pissed. my town does not know what to do so they hire contracted engineers who all have different opinions. nothing moves forward. if posible use every penny you have to pay of the mortgage and dont have flood insurance. FEMA paid out to people for damage with no insurance and i still wait. where is the justice??

Comment_arrow

foggyworld

7:54 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

Wiser heads would have suggested giving people who complied with REASONABLE changes to NJ's way out of date building codes, significant tax credits. But that just ain't in the cards. There's no money it for the in-crowd.

And for people who could not take on the burden of a loan, they should have been allowed to repair where they stood. Ultimately those houses would be bought in the future as tear downs and the houses replacing them who be built to code. The few houses that were truly destroyed should have had access to low, low interest loans to help them come back. But that's why we have banks. Now if only they weren't also so out of control .....

njiloveitnthebutt

8:32 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013

Revolution or stop paying for everything and buy a 11 and a half inch sub at subway

Reply
Comment_arrow

foggyworld

7:56 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

Dear Fed Up,

Do NOT bulld up without your town's and fema's approval because if you go ahead alone you will not be entitled to any funds from Fema. See a lawyer before you do anything.

Comment_arrow

foggyworld

7:57 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

That's kind of a given because not many folks can afford even that sort of "vacation" from this hell.

CM

9:08 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013

The costs are not "unimaginable" 10,000 homes x $30,000 = $300 Million Dollars.
Manchester just lost $700 Million Dollars in home valuation, since it's last valuation.
It's about 1 car per household. If you wish to live near an Ocean, there are costs. Those living there have been lucky, but their luck has run out. So now it's time to pay the piper.

Reply
Comment_arrow

foggyworld

8:05 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

We have been paying the piper all along by paying humungous taxes and for high insurance which the government never should have run. And don't even bring up Manchester which today we learned though spared by the storm is now about to be able to tap into the SBA loan money that was set aside for actual storm victims.

And many of us, by the way, have been building to what the American Association of Architects has been suggesting for well over 20 years. The problem was created by homes built before pilings were dreamed of and the towns in NJ that continued to resist raising those standards to include hurricane prevention techniques.

The folks you think should shoulder more have lost a great deal more than the $30,000 per house in Manchester. The entire State is sinking because of our ultra high taxes and people just don't want to live in this area any more.

And watch out because it isn't just shore communities fema is coming after. You could be the next to be told to rebuild your homes say to meet standards that will survive an Oyster Creek disaster.

But if we leave and after you and the folks in Lakewood have siphoned off money intended for new pilings which do in fact work, just think of what your property taxes are going to be.

Mary Ann

11:15 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013

Hey Michelle, sorry you feel like you're under the bus. Don't take it personally unless you made the decision not to build up the dunes or objected to dunes in front of your view. Guess what - We pay our taxes too! We do not live off of you. We just decided not to purchased waterfront property because we understood that premium property carried with it a higher tax load. We simply ask to be treated fairly when this is all final. How is it fair for FEMA (and now our governor) to raise the backbay communities to a higher flood level than those along the oceanfront? Does their decision take into consideration the fact that our properties might not have flooded if those communities along the ocean had put dunes in place when the Army Corps. of Engineers made this recommended years ago? Can you please explain to us why our flood zone should be higher?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Michelle Blamble

9:35 am on Saturday, January 26, 2013

For years the island has been carrying the freights for Toms River and not getting the services. I can't tell you how many times I've had to call about the trash not picked up in the winter or to ask them to plow the streets. Your fury over V zone shouldn't be focused on the middle of Ortley Beach being an A zone. For all I know it has to do with elevation over sea level (did you know the island has a small hill. I'm actually five feet over sea level - maybe on the lagoon you are lower). I don't know but I do know that the engineer ARGUEING for FEMA to raise my rates pisses me off. We really don't need to be at each others throats when the government is the enemy.

Brooke

12:54 am on Saturday, January 26, 2013

If your home had no damage and you are moving from a X zone to A zone do you still have to raise or pay these high premiums? If you had damage but purchased a PRP Policy while in an X zone will you grandfathered in when you become a A zone?

Reply

Floodgate

7:14 am on Saturday, January 26, 2013

Depending on the heights of your house ,you will need an elevation certificate to determine that . Unfortunately you won't be grandfathered

Reply
Comment_arrow

foggyworld

8:07 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

And the lack of grandfathering is also the result of one of the few decisions the Governor made by himself.

Michael Capo

8:16 am on Saturday, January 26, 2013

Within the small area that is Ortley Beach, look at the different degrees of damage done in areas that had dunes, and areas that did not. In Ortley Beach proper, more damage was done than in the first three blocks of Ortley next to Seaside. Harding avenue in Ortley could arguably be called the worst hit. Toms River collects beach fees from the Ortley public beach. They are supposed to pay for beach maintenance. There are residents of Ortley (one very knowledgeable individual in particular) who have said that Toms River has not maintained the dunes for at least the last 10 years. Refer to the minutes of the December 26 Toms River council meeting. Then maybe the question that Ortley residents need to ask is "what happened to the beach badge revenue" and "why were the dunes neglected for so many years"? Then they may need to examine Toms River's responsibility for their extensive damage exacerbated by lack of dune maintenance.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Benjamin Net Ten Yat who

3:48 pm on Saturday, January 26, 2013

Floodgate, Already there. Will not do a darn thing to this house more then what we have done already, and that is put back the electric , floors and sheetrock. We will stop paying the mortgage in a few months wait till the last minute and file BK. All the while saving every single last dime. Bye , Bye Green Island.

Michael Capo

8:20 am on Saturday, January 26, 2013

The following comes from the Press of Atlantic City. It may help further clarify the murky issue of flood premiums.

Flood-insurance rates, which were not affected by the advisory maps, already have shot up as of this month due to new federal regulations requiring property owners to pay more into a deeply indebted National Flood Insurance Program. For those properties that may be below the base flood elevation in a few years, the cost increase is staggering, former DEP Commissioner Mark Mauriello said.

Flood insurance for a typical coastal zone house built to the minimum elevation standard would be about $1,700 per year for full coverage, he said. If the structure has been raised to 2 feet above the minimum, the cost is $633 a year. But if the house is 1 foot below the minimum standard, the cost is $5,200 a year; 2 feet below costs $8,300 a year, Mauriello said. Mortgage lienholders typically require homeowners in FEMA flood zones to carry flood insurance.

If a house is in a velocity zone and is 4 feet below the new elevation, as is what is listed for the entire Mystic Islands section of Little Egg Harbor Township, homeowners that make no changes will see an average annual premium in several years of as much as $31,000, Christie said.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Floodgate

9:19 am on Saturday, January 26, 2013

If The Powers of our towns and state drink the Fema Kool-aid , there will be none of our money left to line their pockets with....cause we won't be here ,wait till bankruptcy attorneys start showing up in these towns . Foreclosure is the cheapest and most effective .save money in the four years it takes the bank to get your house , buy somewhere else . It beats paying insane flood rates to a failed government program who has caused nothing but headaches for us.....what a time to unleash bad news ,right as they are not following through on their agreement

Comment_arrow

Dave

4:13 pm on Saturday, January 26, 2013

If you are going to pay $31,000 a year you might as well be self insured. I believe you can only get 250K max of Flood coverage, therefore this 31K figure makes no sense. In ten years you will have more than the coverage and wont have to deal with the insurance companies.

Comment_arrow

foggyworld

8:11 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

And if you dig into how Fema arrived at these measurements, you will find them to be sorely lacking in scientific merit. Problem is we the people have to hire lawyers and engineers to contest what everyone agrees is faulty data.

And Fema's notions about building hurricane prevention houses are way over and above what has been proven to work just fine for a great deal less money.

Floodgate

9:24 am on Saturday, January 26, 2013

Rich or poor ,no one is stupid enough to pay these rates . Are the mortgage companies that we owe money to ok with Fema adding $400 to $2600 a month? How is it that I needed blood samples to get approved for my mortgage but they can do whatever they want ,this is a joke

Reply
Comment_arrow

foggyworld

8:14 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

Dave above,

Self insurance should be an option but the banks have cut that one off and REQUIRE their customers to carry and pay for that ridiculously expensive insurance on these homes that Fema claims are never worth more than $250,000.

barbara

10:13 am on Saturday, January 26, 2013

i agree Floodgate. This is a horrible situation. We already started renovating but cannot afford to raise and pay that type of money. They are insane.....

Reply
Comment_arrow

Floodgate

10:41 am on Saturday, January 26, 2013

And it appears New Jersey is the only state being targeted , we are the only state listed on the region2coastal map with a new ABFE ..why is that?

Comment_arrow

foggyworld

8:15 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

Please just repair. Anything you pay for without fema's blessing is completely on you.

Bev

10:52 am on Saturday, January 26, 2013

The most flood insurance will pay is $250,000. Why would anyone pay $31,000 per year for that!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Anthony Tremarco

11:38 am on Saturday, January 26, 2013

With all the height requirements how long before a lawsuit is brought that the homes are no longer handicap accessible. The new requirement will be elevators.

Comment_arrow

foggyworld

8:16 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

Because our Governor gave Fema ALL of the power we gave him to run this state.

Roman

11:36 am on Saturday, January 26, 2013

I'm currently in an A zone (newly 8' designation). With this statement below by TR, do we raise to the V levels by the ocean (14') or V levels by the bay (10')? Of course there is no statement by the township that they'll relax the 35' height restriction.

Ortley Beach Property Owners. The ABFEs will be revised and final maps issued in August 2013. It is expected that the revised maps will place Ortley Beach entirely in a “V” zone. Building and zoning permits will be issued for dwellings rebuilt according to the adopted ABFEs (under which some sections of Ortley Beach are not in a “V” zone). But because of the expected change to Ortley Beach’s designation, property owners should consult with their professionals to determine the safest and most cost-effective way to rebuild. Again, non-compliant homes risk not only significantly higher insurance rates, but severe damage from future storms.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Michael Capo

3:18 pm on Saturday, January 26, 2013

If the TR town engineer has his way , Ortley will be a V zone......TR is out of synch and out of control..

Comment_arrow

foggyworld

8:17 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

There is no cost-effective way to stay. It's one big Catch 22.

Mary Ann

12:23 pm on Saturday, January 26, 2013

Michelle, you are correct when you say that we should not fight among ourselves right now. We all are victims of both the storm and our broken FEMA system. It is not my intention to upset anyone further, but rather simply point out a huge discrepancy in the FEMA flood map that needs to be addressed. My home is actually at a base elevation of 8ft and now we are looking at having to raise our homes in this area to 14ft. - on pilings. We are not even waterfront let alone oceanfront. It just doesn't make any sense.

Reply
Comment_arrow

foggyworld

8:19 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

It makes perfect sense if your goal is to rid this area of the middle class. As Rahm Emanuel has often said to the President, "never let a crisis go to waste."

John

2:24 pm on Saturday, January 26, 2013

Having personally experience the storm on the island in Ortley Beach and having had to opportunity to survey the damage immediately after the storm, I must say that the FEMA map as presented is pretty accurate. Moving forward any adjustment is made, I for see them being lowered. Many unique circumstances took place during this unprecedented storm. Much of the damage that took place on the barrier island was due to poor planning/building of dunes. Toms River needs to admit to the lack of pro action and now step up and do the right thing for the community that has being paying for but not receiving services. The Mayor and the Engineer are clearly most concerned for the mainland residents. It,s time for our government to represent us all equally. All Toms River residents must demand better from our local leaders!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Michael Capo

3:16 pm on Saturday, January 26, 2013

Toms River needs to show how the beach badge money collected from OrtleyBeach was spent for the last ten years. The Ortley residents can probably state that it surely wasn't spent on dune maintenance.

Floodgate

3:10 pm on Saturday, January 26, 2013

I wish I knew that guy who climbed the Jet Star , I would have paid him to make our statement heard

Reply

Angelo Turello

3:28 pm on Saturday, January 26, 2013

All of the residents of the barrier island who are part of Toms river who have public beach should get together and do a class action against toms river for not fixing the dunes for 25 years,,,,thats what destroyed there houses

Reply

George Kasimos

4:41 pm on Saturday, January 26, 2013

Lets face it. We are not the only ones that will have to raise our homes or have higher flood insurance premiums. Every homeowner who is in a flood zone will soon realize that this is not just a Superstorm Sandy issue. By the way 18% of all homeowners in the U.S.A. live in a flood zone. (Think of Wayne, BoundBrook, Florida, Mississipi Valley, etc... This is going to have massive implications to the housing market.

On a semi-good note. I just came back from the Toms River meeting about reconstruction. The FEMA representative stated that the new Flood Insurace Rates will not kick in for 2 years. Also a few of the Toms River representatives stated that they are going to vigorously fight the elevation levels set by FEMA. Lets keep our fingers crossed.

If you are a flooded homeowner please visit and like www.facebook.com/StopFemaNow
we need to get numbers to hear our voices heard

Reply
Comment_arrow

Floodgate

9:49 pm on Saturday, January 26, 2013

No other state is discussing rate increases like we are being exposed to , I've only seen other states facing a one time 25% increase at best ,in fact some areas are being removed from flood maps and insurance . Also on the region2coastal map ,New Jersey is the only state on the map listing ABFE , I mean New York got hit too right? Why are they not screaming about increased flood rates ,again something is not right about this whole thing and I can't help but to think Jersey is being singled out.

Comment_arrow

foggyworld

8:22 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

I sure hope you got that in writing because I get all sorts of answers and none of them line up with one another. Fema isn't the only player in this game. Local officials are a big part of it and in other states, the Governors are playing huge roles.

jim

9:59 pm on Saturday, January 26, 2013

Where are our 2 US Senators concerning this matter ???

Reply
Comment_arrow

Art D

12:02 pm on Monday, January 28, 2013

Lautenberg is napping and Menendez is hiding sex offenders from being deported.

Comment_arrow

foggyworld

8:24 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

Jim, that has to be a joke question. One is 89 and finally realizes he ought not to run for re-election and the other one has huge personal problems to contend with that just have to be cutting into his sleep and also his devotion to duty.

yolanda knollhuff

4:15 pm on Sunday, January 27, 2013

Some1..just help us..love 4 the shore..

Reply

Art D

12:04 pm on Monday, January 28, 2013

Twas FEMA that killed the Jersey Shore and our elected officials are allowing it to happen for the most part. Kudos to those that are standing up to the FED.

Reply
Comment_arrow

foggyworld

8:26 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

In the beginning I thought our elected officials were naive and "allowing it to happen" As time has gone by I have had to accept the fact that those officials are enablers of Fema.

Kim Gloede Burns

10:04 pm on Monday, January 28, 2013

ULTERIOR MOTIVES IN TOMS RIVER'S ATTEMPTS TO MANIPULATE ABFEs.....

Ortley Beach Property Owners. The ABFEs will be revised and final maps issued in August 2013. It is expected that the revised maps will place Ortley Beach entirely in a “V” zone. Building and zoning permits will be issued for dwellings rebuilt according to the adopted ABFEs (under which some sections of Ortley Beach are not in a “V” zone). But because of the expected change to Ortley Beach’s designation, property owners should consult with their professionals to determine the safest and most cost-effective way to rebuild. Again, non-compliant homes risk not only significantly higher insurance rates, but severe damage from future storms.

Mainland Property Owners. The ABFEs establish several new “V” zone designations on the mainland. Township officials strongly disagree with those designations and have registered those objections with FEMA. At present, however, the Township’s objections have been overruled with the State’s adoption of the ABFEs. Consequently, the “V” zone designations remain in place for the present time and property owners located therein must rebuild accordingly. These “V” zone designations on the mainland may “shrink” with the issuance of the final maps in August 2013, but this change is not certain.

Reply

George Kasimos

8:13 am on Tuesday, January 29, 2013

According to gov Christie's press conference in seaside heights last week. He stated that there were numerous errors with the flood maps. But he stated that if there are any updates it would be to put homes in lower classifications.

Www.facebook.com/StopFemaNow
Lets get together and fight this together

Reply
Comment_arrow

foggyworld

8:29 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

And just what did the dear Governor have to say about his stopping things right now and putting his bad decision behind him and telling Fema to go home.

And just what is he and his large band of civil servants doing besides widening the road to Seaside? What is he actually doing and supervising and is he sending lawyers into courtrooms to defend us from the predators who have invaded from Washington?

Lee Garrett

9:18 am on Wednesday, January 30, 2013

While those rebuilding will have to build higher, they will at least get assistance in doing so. Those of us whose homes were high enough that they did not flood will bear the entire cost of this out of pocket. As a result of the new map my home is now 2.4 inches below the new ABFE for my area. As such if the new rates go into affect as have been discussed in other articles I would be forced to walk away from my home as my flood insurance alone, required by my mortgage company, would cost more than my current payment which included taxes and insurances. Property values took a beating when the housing bubble collapsed a few years ago and again after Sandy. Raising my home would not increase it's value one dime. It would only maintain a value that is less than what I currentl owe. If all of the Government officials and regulators can explain how that would make sense for me I'd love to hear it. I am not going to put one more nickle into my undamaged home because if this is not resolved I am looking at a strategic forclosure. Most that I have talked to whose homes were not damaged are in the same boat. Others I have talked to who sustained "substantial damage" are paying off their mortagages with their insurance settlements, tearing down their homes, taking what they can get for the lots, and moving on. This will destroy the ratable base at the shore. If our Governor does not want the Jersey Shore to become the "Detroit" of NJ this needs to be addressed.

Reply
Comment_arrow

S. Bar

3:53 pm on Wednesday, January 30, 2013

This can't be legal Lee. I bet we start to see people suing the fed. govt. who we relied on giving us accurate base flood elevations and maps. Turns out they considered them outdated prior to Sandy. That is not our fault and if they kept on top of this we would have known our houses weren't considered high enough PRIOR to buying.

George Kasimos

12:40 pm on Wednesday, January 30, 2013

Dear Press, Public Officials and Flood Insurance Property Owners:

What we want are our Politicians to change;
1) A thorough re-evaluation of the flood zones, in a timely fashion.
2) Evaluating if we raise the dunes a few feet if it will significantly reduce all our flood levels and insurance premiums.
3) Getting quick answers as to who gets the mitigation grants, when they get the grant and for how much.
4) Creative ways to lower our flood insurance premiums
5) Grace period of a few years before the rise in flood insurance premiums
6) FEMA to notify all homeowners of the impending new flood insurance rates and elevation requirements

What we want from all Flood Insurance homeowners to do;
1) Copy and paste this email and send to your local, state, federal politicians and members of Press.
2) Form Coalition to protect our interests.
3) Spread the word to your neighbors

George Kasimos
www.facebook.com/StopFemaNow

Reply
Comment_arrow

foggyworld

8:34 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

I would add that the State of NJ would seem to have the legal responsibility to prevent any federal agency from devastating thousands of its citizens via a program run by the well known to be inept federal group called Fema.

And I also think the State should reserve the right to establish state wide but area sensitive building codes that are realistic and take the small town pols out of holding power they are for the most part unable to use in an educated and wise way.

S. Bar

3:51 pm on Wednesday, January 30, 2013

So if you had no interior damage (less than 50% obviously), and you have a mortgage so need flood insurance and FEMA has changed their mind on your zone = you have to pay to raise your house but don't qualify for the Increased Cost of Compliance grant? How is that fair? I bought my house 5 years ago and trusted that FEMA's maps were reliable and therefore thought I knew what my flood insurance would be and it fit into my budget. Now I come to learn that the old maps were considered outdated anyway. Wasn't it FEMA'S repsonsiblity to provide semi-accurate information on this? A sharp increase in flood insurance is NOT something I can afford. If I try to sell my house I will have to pay significantly at the closing table. Raising my house will cost aprox $40,000-$60,000.

Reply
Comment_arrow

foggyworld

8:35 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

"FAIR" is a word that civil "servants" never, ever operate under.

Suzanne

7:07 am on Monday, February 11, 2013

Our house was 7 ft above the 100 yr flood. We were so very fortunate that the water stopped inches below our floor joists. Only the crawl, shed and garage had water. All things not covered by our flood insurance anyway. Now we are 2 ft below? Because we did not suffer the horrible tragedy of many we do not qualify for remediation grants. What the heck did we pay flood insurance for? This house has been in the family since 1983. Never had we seen water cover our dock. I feel greatly for those on the barrier island. But the dunes must go up all along the Jersey shore. If the dunes were there we never would have flooded the way we did. Build those dunes. Sorry Richie Rich but your few weeks of views is not worth it to the rest of us. I think we should sue them. I'm so angry that the rest of us will have to pay for those views. Jersey got it wrong many years ago when they allowed people to own the beach. It is wrong in so many ways.

Reply
Comment_arrow

foggyworld

8:37 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

If you were among the lucky, you paid all those insurance premiums to be given an SBA loan application probably by a Fema person. For this we have a huge standing army of civil "servants" who once again are unable to deliver the goods we paid for.

Leave a comment

 

The Toms River Patch
Valentine's Shopping Guide

See the full guide!

Patch Picks