Public Funds for Dune Replenishment Means Public Access
If the owners of private beachfront property in Ortley Beach want their dunes replaced by the township, they need to grant public beach access, township says.
Toms River has replaced the sand dunes on publicly owned oceanfront property in Ortley Beach that were washed away during Hurricane Sandy. The township is willing to extend the same courtesy to the owners of private beachfronts, too, but on one condition. And it’s not a small one.
According to township solicitor Ken Fitzsimmons, the township is legally prohibited from spending taxpayer funds to replenish dunes on private property destroyed by Sandy. That’s no longer a problem should the property owners grant the township an easement. As a condition of the easement, however, Toms River is requiring property owners to grant the township public access to the beach between the dunes and the Atlantic Ocean in perpetuity.
Suddenly, the private in private beaches no longer applies.
Fitzsimmons said letters informing property owners of the dune replenishment bargain were mailed to about 30 different entities, among them residential property owners, business owners, and condo associations located along the ocean on Ortley Beach. So far, only two property owners have agreed to the township’s terms, one officially.
In all, Fitzsimmons said he’s been in contact with “eight or nine” lawyers representing property owners in Ortley Beach that would be impacted by the easement. Some property owners have yet to respond to an original letter and a follow up sent out by the township.
Toms River’s council members have been instructed to not discuss the details of the easement letters on the advice of Fitzsimmons. The council attorney also demurred when asked to explain the easements, saying that discussing the letters and the easement in detail would be unethical and could represent a conflict of interest moving forward.
Fitzsimmons did, however, provide the letters sent to Ortley Beach property owners without objection. From the follow up letter:
Private beaches that granted the easement would be included in the replenishment project. The easement is required by law because the Township is constitutionally prohibited from expending public funds to improve privately-owned properties.
The project has been underway for several weeks and is nearing completion and we have not received your response. This is your final opportunity to have your beach included in the replenishment project…otherwise your property will be omitted from the project and you will have to replenish your dune at your own expense, which likely will be substantial.
Dune replenishment began on Ortley Beach in November shortly after the township accepted a $1.3 million bid from Earle Asphalt Company. Toms River Engineer Bob Chankalian said dune replenishment on public property has been completed with the township now considering augmenting the tidal shelf to prevent the new dunes from being washed away.
Toms River is also one of several towns hoping to have the Army Corps of Engineers provide an assessment of the beachfront and contribute to new methods of storm protection in the months ahead. To do so, however, requires towns to submit applications and, in a sense, get in line for the Corps services. All of the townships dunes must have been replaced at the time of the application, making replenishment a time-sensitive issue.
bayway mike
3:25 pm on Thursday, December 13, 2012
If the beach is still there for the summer season, will I need to pay for a beach badge??
Tom Woodward
3:27 pm on Thursday, December 13, 2012
Easement forever ...who takes care of the beaches and lifeguard expense. Not to mention the potential loss of incme from the badges. It's a bad deal to grant anyone perpetual anything
BobD
3:34 pm on Thursday, December 13, 2012
Its about time! No one should own our state's beaches - period. When I was a kid my family owned a bungalo on a lagoon lot in the Dover Shores section of Toms River. At the end of of the street was the Barnegat Bay and the beach was for the residents. Eventually money changed hands and first one side of the street, then the other was sold and made private property, with only the width of the street left as our neighborhood beach. Our state's natural resources belong to the people, not only the wealthy.
Cade
3:35 pm on Thursday, December 13, 2012
probably if it's a public beach, that's part of what pays to take care of it, lifeguards, etc...
PJ Ortley
3:43 pm on Thursday, December 13, 2012
My opinion: Grant the easement or invoke eminent domain and just take the land.
Many home owners in Ortley Beach had their homes destroyed or severely damaged because the selfish owners of private beach front would not allow beach replenishment on their property. It is time to say the beach is public and engineered beaches are mandatory to protect property behind them. Anyone in the way of that must stand aside or be removed. If it cannot happen at the local level, then its time to ask Governor Christie to do it for us state wide.
Daniel Nee
4:49 pm on Thursday, December 13, 2012
PJ -- The issue towns are now facing comes in the wake of the Harvey Cedars decision, where the borough was ordered to compensate an oceanfront owner $375,000 for an easement that was taken by eminent domain so beach replenishment could go forward. Municipalities would now be taking a chance that they would have to pay significant amounts of money for these easements. A Long Beach Township case is now moving forward in federal court, which could take special benefits arguments into account and potentially reduce these awards - depending on how the court rules. The issue is very much in flux.
Michelle V
7:13 pm on Thursday, December 13, 2012
I live in Surf Cottages which is a private beach community. We maintain our beach, pay our lifeguards and PAY TOMS RIVER TAXES!! We also were the only beach to have DUNES in Ortley and had the least damage to our homes because of it. Before you make comments about wealthy people, selfish people, etc. get your info correct. We pay separate dues to maintain our beach; however, since Sandy washed up debris from ALL OVER, it's not all our garbage, lumber, car parts on our beach, Toms River should pay to clean / replenish our beach with OUR TAX DOLLARS!!!
Karin Krueger
8:19 pm on Thursday, December 13, 2012
I agree.
Concerned
9:28 pm on Thursday, December 13, 2012
So funny "your beach" but not what washed up? I'm sure if diamonds washed up they would be yours! Can't wait to hangin our beach with my homies this summer.
MMC RNC
1:40 am on Friday, December 14, 2012
Surf Cottages homes were left with little more than some flooding- none of the debris that has littered their beach is from their homes. And she is right!! They pay way more in property taxes, most of them can't vote in the local elections because they are not full time residents, and they don't utilize the local schools. So in essence they are footing the bill for a large portion of Toms River. They do deserve to see the benefits of their property taxes for a change.
If not, Ortley needs to become it's own town!!! What do you need Toms River for anyway? You are just acting as a Cash Cow for them!!!!
Ana Prodani
4:38 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
Michelle, I beg to differ. VB dunes were 210ft x 150x 26ft. Our dune eroded thanks to the unprotected access ramp on Harding where the water first breached. The truth of the matter is that the private associations in Ortley had better dunes than TR.
Rob
3:46 pm on Thursday, December 13, 2012
This will certainly be a tough decision when weighing the options. What to do? Open access to all beach goers and gain the unwanted intrusion of 1000's of people every day (some of which will be interested more in the houses than the beach), or save the privacy of the associations and incur a large cost. Aren't there already enough open access beaches. Glad I don't have to make this kind of decision!
taxed-out-the-wazoo
4:45 pm on Thursday, December 13, 2012
Idiots! Dumping some sand for the safety of public/which IS a public policy issue & is NOT adverse possession. Hey, Township, that if water breaches the beach area and causes harm to the rest of the Community through those UNPROTECTED areas that you knowingly ignored will be YOUR liability. Please accept this as notice of such. Some of the beach properties have been washed/wind blown away...no longer existing or just foundations. So, exactly what are they protecting now? Exactly, nothing so why spend the expense to protect a foundation. Since nothing will be placed in those areas you BETTER make sure that the street areas have adequate dunes to protect the rest of the community behind those properties which no longer exist or are severly damaged and will not have dunes at their expense put in. The streets behind those properties ARE Township owned and should be Township maintained...I say this because we in OB know how much attention the Township paid attention to our infrastructure previously (hence the monumental problems now). I wonder which brain trust came up with this one. Again, YOU need to think of the community, now. And, when (or if) the beach owners rebuild, then deal with it. But, WE/the entire community needs protection NOW. If I had a beach property and it was destroyed, I would not agree to this. I would rebuild at my leisure and not give a worry about the missing dunes, I have nothing to protect. The rest of the community does!
Ana Prodani
4:40 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
Well said!
MIC
4:56 pm on Thursday, December 13, 2012
private beaches area joke, and they should be held accountable for any measures neccessary to provide the island the same as any where else. you should have to ether pay for your own dunes or the state will pay and get the access. thier should be no gray area.
Pat S.
5:21 pm on Thursday, December 13, 2012
As someone involved in the situation, it needs to be known that the town would not explain anything to the private beach associations when asked what the parameters of this so-called agreement were. They hid behind " We cannot legally advise you" when all we asked for was clarification, not advice. Be aware , too, that our private beaches must still be paid for and maintained by our associations- we have to pay for lifeguards, badge checkers, and maintenance - not a single penny will be, or ever was contributed by Toms River, So we are expected to privately pay for a beach that will now be open to the public.
Concerned
6:10 pm on Thursday, December 13, 2012
As a taxpayer, beach lover and citizen of this planet I'm sick of your I got mine aditude. Where do you think your "beach" ends Africa? You didn't build it and you really don't own it. Don't worry I won't ask you for lemon aid or to put another shrimp on the BBQ! Can't wait to hang.
We R TR
8:34 pm on Thursday, December 13, 2012
Laws are there for a reason. What part of it is illegal to spend taxpayer money on private land don't you understand.
taxed-out-the-wazoo
12:56 am on Friday, December 14, 2012
Hey Pat - Just noting, too, that PUBLIC funds were used to build the new football stadium up North...they were used to build the music center in Trenton...they were used to build the stadium in Lakewood for the Blue Claws, etc. Don't we still need to buy tickets to attend any events there, too? Why would this be different? I don't believe it is. There is no public access to these areas where public funds (state AND federal) were used. Further, I don't have children in the school system, but MY tax funds are used to publicly fund them (state and federal). Should I be allowed to just stop in and take a computer class if I so desire? No. I am not. And, aren't state and federal funds also used for higher education/college? But, don't most colleges have allowable acceptances and tuition? These are not open to the public yet public funds are used. So, there are exceptions and MANY examples of public funds being used (federal and state) and full access by the public is not allowed.
Nikki Lescavage
1:24 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012
Take a look at the properties that were destroyed near the surf club. Those streets and homes were hit the hardest. That public dune system (toms river created and maintained) did not protect those homes. In fact that dune system probably even further impacted the dune system and community of vision beach. So why in the world would you want toms river to rebuild your dunes? Your shore community .i.e. private community build and maintained your own. Correct? Compare your damages to that of the homes that have public beaches and or dunes. Trust your association and your neighbors. Rebuild it yourselves if you want it done correctly.
Ana Prodani
4:41 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
Thank you!!!!!!!!!!
Ana Prodani
4:51 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
Nikki, I completely agree. We are building our own. We have never taken a penny from TR. That said, my concern is that we are adjacent to TR public beach and the unprotected access ramp on Harding, therefore regardless of how high, or how wide we build our dune, it stands to be lost again if TR doesn't do something about the open access ramps on Harding, which all believe caused this mess. Our dune was the largest and oldest on the island but what good did that do us. The ramp is adjacent to our dune. The water breached on Harding and eroded all the dunes to the right and left.
Nick Durovich
6:08 pm on Thursday, December 13, 2012
The "So Called" dune that Earle has provided is a joke. There's no internal support or compaction so the first good North East storm this money spent will be washed back into the ocean. Private beach owners are better off building these dunes the correct way with snow fencing and dune grass.
NDURO (RSB Resident)
George
9:29 am on Friday, December 14, 2012
Belmar or one of the other nearby towns is installing a steel wall and covering it with sand to create dunes with more solid protection from storm surges. Why not here?
Ana Prodani
4:55 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
Nick, Our dune was 150ft x 210ft x 26ft. It was braced by a bulk head. The dune has protected since 1947. We would have never lost it if TR had protected the beach access ramp adjacent to our dune.
Ortley
6:22 pm on Thursday, December 13, 2012
Pat S is 100% right. ...we as a private owned beach do pay for lifeguards, badge checkers,badges and maintenance as well as.....property taxes on the beach to the Township of Toms River!
We in the private beach areas are not rich wealthy people,we are just people that at some time made a good decision to buy there. Anyone else can do it....just work hard,save and pay a lot in taxes.....for nothing in return from Toms River....like we do.
We will rebuild our own dunes,we ask for nothing from the state or town.
taxed-out-the-wazoo
1:02 am on Friday, December 14, 2012
Hey Ortley...note my comment to Pat - "Just noting, too, that PUBLIC funds were used to build the new football stadium up North...they were used to build the music center in Trenton...they were used to build the stadium in Lakewood for the Blue Claws, etc. Don't we still need to buy tickets to attend any events there, too? Why would this be different? I don't believe it is. There is no public access to these areas where public funds (state AND federal) were used. Further, I don't have children in the school system, but MY tax funds are used to publicly fund them (state and federal). Should I be allowed to just stop in and take a computer class if I so desire? No. I am not. And, aren't state and federal funds also used for higher education/college? But, don't most colleges have allowable acceptances and tuition? These are not open to the public yet public funds are used. So, there are exceptions and MANY examples of public funds being used (federal and state) and full access by the public is not allowed."
Certainly this is something that should be explored by potential litigation. Why is the beach an exception to these other venues where public funding (state and federal are used) but public access/use is NOT allowed?
Quite frankly, as a taxpayer, you/your community are already making a contributions to the sand replenishment.
We R TR
3:16 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012
Hey taxed-out-the wazoo...My kids live in Ohio they can bring 20 of their friends to a football or baseball game, buy tickets and get in. Can they do the same on your "private beach". I don't think so. That is the difference. Just sayin.
Ajv
6:32 pm on Thursday, December 13, 2012
First of beach badges anywhere is BS. That crap that the money raised pays for maintence is just that crap. Our taxes r plenty high. ALL township residents should be aloud on beach free. You want to raise funds charge the Bennys
Shellfish
7:17 pm on Thursday, December 13, 2012
It's not crap! Who do you think pays for the lifeguards? Who do you think pays to have the beach cleaned? Who do you think pays for storm fences and dune upkeep? Who do you think pays for equipment for the lifeguards to save your sorry ass when you go swimming? Toms River does not give the private associations one single penny! The only way to pay for those things is by the sale of beach badges. If you want to go to a dirty unprotected beach just so you don't have to spring for a beach badge, you should go to some other state!!!!!
Ken G
8:06 am on Friday, December 14, 2012
@Shellfish, New Jersey is the only state in the country to make people pay to get on a beach. In other states it is illegal and those who attempt to can even get some jail time.
beachfan
10:07 am on Friday, December 14, 2012
Ken G.... NJ is not the only state that charges a fee for beach access. Ct charges for access to state beaches and calls it a parking fee. A couple of years ago it was $13 for CT residents and $20 for out of state cars. I am not sure if its free if you walk or bike in.
shorefriend
11:09 am on Friday, December 14, 2012
Define Benny?
A) Owns property on barrier island but not primary resident,- pays taxes and contributes to retail establisments
B) Rents every year, contributes large amounts of money
c) Visits occasionally
I hate them term so darogatory, and unwelcoming. I bet if you ask any of the local business owners about Benny's they would tell you; "we can't survive with out them"
I am a full time resident and I got to tell you there is not many living here after Sept 1st
beachfan
11:45 am on Friday, December 14, 2012
@ Ajv...please lose the bennys name. Such a demeaning and entitled attitude towards visitors of the town you live in. Are you treated that way when you vacation to other places? NJ shore communities live off of tourism from visitors. A visitor can pay $1000 - $5000 for a single week at a NJ beach home, which can be more than half of an owners property tax bill and insurance. Frequent visitors pay daily, weekly or seasonal badge and toll fees and local businesses depend on the revenue when they eat in their establishments or shop in their stores. Stop the eliteness because you are fortunate enough to own a home near the ocean. Appreciate the revenue that keeps your taxes reasonable living so close to the ocean.
beachfan
12:50 pm on Friday, December 14, 2012
@shorefriend...Well said. Happy to hear that from a full time resident.
OrtleyOwner
7:01 pm on Thursday, December 13, 2012
Many of these people have owned these house for 50 plus years. My house has been in our family for almost 50. None of us are wealthy and we do like our community and trust everyone in it. Fitzsimmons is a crook and Toms River wants more money so they are treating us like assholes. We will do it ourselves.
Ajv
7:34 pm on Thursday, December 13, 2012
@shellfish it's crap get a grip, that should come out of our property tax child, so the sorry ass!! You should buy us all badges since your speaking for everyone assboy
Ajv
7:46 pm on Thursday, December 13, 2012
I'm saying full time residents shouldn't have to buy beach badges
Ortley
7:46 pm on Thursday, December 13, 2012
Toms River should then be obligated to give these private beach communities back their sand that was their dunes so we can replenish our own sand dunes. What gives them the right to keep it?
Concerned
9:33 pm on Thursday, December 13, 2012
If you can prove which grains where yours I agree you get them back
Ana Prodani
5:07 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
Ortley....not only our sand, but how about the damage caused by the bulldozers to the homes when they went in and stole the sand! I guess they didn't think we all had pictures of the homes after the storm since it took weeks for them to grant us access. I have pictures of my house right after the storm and after the bulldozing. I can't beleive the damage caused by the town! My insurance adjuster took close ups of the bucket tooth marks in my house from the bulldozers.
Shellfish
7:47 pm on Thursday, December 13, 2012
Ajv...I don't know what you are trying to say. It does NOT come out of the property tax. Toms River does NOT and will NOT pay for any of those things out of anyone's tax dollars. Most associations are NON-PROFIT associations. All money made by selling badges is put into the beach. It doesn't go into anyone's pocket. Do you understand now why beach badges are required?
Ana Prodani
5:09 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
No they don't. They're just angry that they can't afford to live there.
Ortley
7:49 pm on Thursday, December 13, 2012
Then Ajv,....why should "non full time residents" pay.....full time taxes?
Ajv
7:54 pm on Thursday, December 13, 2012
If your a property owner than you pay property tax
Halpha2
8:02 pm on Thursday, December 13, 2012
Please make ortley like island beach state park. Keep your taxes and whining and bring it elsewhere. Jamo's! It is obvious that no matter what is done u cant please everyone. So make it one big fishing, surfing, clamming, waterfront local area. Keep the checkpoints to filter the shit(i will fund that) . Where's the argument?
SB Girl
7:49 am on Friday, December 14, 2012
Hope you are ready to have your taxes in Toms River double or triple...since that is what would happen if you didn't have the cash cow of taxes coming from the barrier island!
Ajv
8:14 pm on Thursday, December 13, 2012
Agreed !!! Bravo Halpha2
JEANNE
9:30 pm on Thursday, December 13, 2012
I found the one comment about all the garbage on the beach not their garbage very interesting. Are they under the impression that ocean front private properties are the only tax payers that had to clean up garbage that wasn't theirs? Why exactly should my taxes pay to remove "your" garbage? We lugged garbage to the curb, which the township picked up, or paid to have it removed if it was too large, e.g. a jet ski, lumber from other's docks etc. So why do you believe you are more entitled? We all pay taxes, they benefit us all as a community, equally. I don't believe the town is obligated to fix my bulkhead, dock, or my landscaping, so why should it pay for "your" beach?
Pat S.
10:33 pm on Thursday, December 13, 2012
If the town wants us to make a perpetual easement and give the public access to our beach in exchange for dune replenishment (which, by the way, they won't tell us if this is a one shot deal or "perpetual" as they expect the access to be!) why should we be expected to use our homeowners' dues to maintain it? Our taxes help
support the public beach. The town wants to make our beach public, but expects us
to pay the associated costs. We are either private or public; it can't be both ways.
Mr. ?
11:56 pm on Thursday, December 13, 2012
Pat S., I will give you that one! The township then has the ownership and liability and all associated costs of maintenance and safety. Very interesting debate! Taxes are supposedly for the providing of services to all property owners , from which they are collected, and without privilege or partiality . So those associations wish to keep "their" beaches private, but all 92,700 residents of TR who pay that tax should not be allowed access?...a question? A stupid example, but the barrier island association residents should be able to access all roads, parks, and services in TR in its entirety .....all of us pay for! I wish to know if any of you actually bought and paid for that land - the beach?...which you pay taxes for? No, but you expect exclusivity? Should I, a non barrier island "association" TR resident pay for your sand which I cant use? So a few posts stated these private associations would rather not grant a perpetual easement and pay for dune replenishment themselves? Really? 1.3 mil (Ortley) divided 92,700 residents ( maybe 44,000 households, plus how many business ratepayers? ) equals?...not much each ! And ( I have no idea the linear footage of each "private" beach (cubic yards of sand needed and its cost), amount of property owners of each association, divided by the burden of those costs by those (you) association members . Privilege is one thing, but think about it! Your going to lose this one...maybe try Harvey Cedars.
Donna Griffin
11:26 pm on Thursday, December 13, 2012
I say replenish ALL the beaches in Ortley NOW. Fight the battle as to who pays for it and who is permitted on the beach later. The dunes are an issue of public safety. They do not protect the one oceanfront property. They protect the entire infrastructure down the road. Dunes saved many of these associations' homes, e.g. Midway in SSSP. Why then would Toms River not have seen the wisdom of this barrier system on their public portion of the beach? I would hazard to guess that a large, effective dune structure is not present in Ortley because the beach has narrowed significantly in the past 15 years and to reduce it further by building a 20 ft. high by 40 ft. wide dune structure would cut into their tourism revenue. I think that Mother Nature is making the call on this one though. Protect what little beach remains or lose that entire town with the next storm.
SB Girl
7:54 am on Friday, December 14, 2012
If Toms River maintained the Ortley beaches like the private associations did, with winter fencing and grading for the past 60 years, perhaps Ortley's beach would have been a lot wider and Ortley would have not sustained so much damage!
Donna Griffin
11:49 am on Friday, December 14, 2012
Amen, SB Girl! My point exactly. It is no mystery as to why some beaches, all be it having sustained some damage, have not been decimated like Ortley. Keeping your fingers crossed is not a long-term strategy in maintaining the viability and security of an oceanfront community.
Pat S.
1:18 am on Friday, December 14, 2012
Mr.?- to answer your question- yes, we did pay for the beach! We also paid for our roads which we maintain at no expense to Toms River. Both were purchased from the developer, and every homeowner in our association was assessed in order to purchase the property(which he legally owned) from him. We aren't squatters who
just decided to claim it as our own.
Lisa
7:42 am on Friday, December 14, 2012
What good is having access to a beach that formerly was private if it has no restrooms or parking facilities.
SB Girl
7:59 am on Friday, December 14, 2012
Now let me get this straight...Toms River appropriates $1.4m for dune replenishment and all the private associations say "no thank you"...since the private associations are at least 6 or 8 times the size of the "public beach", I have to assume that Toms River will be no be using at least $1m. Where will those funds go??
Common Sense in Silverton
8:30 am on Friday, December 14, 2012
Grant the township an easement?
Sounds easy enough.
Ortley
8:42 am on Friday, December 14, 2012
its very easy.....if you choose to do it.
As said before we own the beach and roads we pay taxes on,we maintain them and fix them and clean them.Toms River does two things for us....garbage and recycle pick up.....that's it.The Island and 10 miles inland should be dozed and become free public space...that would insure that the full time people from the Parkway west will be safe....hope it doesn't affect any of you...that would be a shame being you worked and saved to buy the house you live in.
It really is not a discussion that can be held any longer when it seems it becomes the haves and the have nots.....as in shark tank.....I'm out. Have a nice day all.
Jennifer Pellosie
9:02 am on Friday, December 14, 2012
People need to have dunes.......don't be stupid people. The beach is for everyone to enjoy! We need to do beach replenishment. Must have dunes! It's pretty simple. Love the Beach......Replenish it! Locals hear us roar!
George
9:31 am on Friday, December 14, 2012
An oceanfront homeowner suing for $375,000 because of "impaired view" from a dune is ridiculous! The house survived only because of the dune. Take the case to the Supreme Court and maybe common sense will win out.
beachfan
9:55 am on Friday, December 14, 2012
From what I hear the OB community in Toms River does allow the public to buy beach badges already, but there is no parking or bathroom facilities. There is no space to add those facilities as the houses are on their own 50 x 30 lot one right after the other. The owners and summer renters of that community are not allowed to park on the streets either as the roads are too narrow, so if other communities are set up the same, there is little or no way to make those more accessible to the public.
Being that the owners in that community (whether summer or all year) pay the same property taxes as an all year Toms River resident (that has voting rights) they should still be entitled for "some" assistance from the beach replenishment pie.
Whether these communities accept the easement or not, they are helping pay for it with their property tax bill regardless. They can still remain private because their own association fees along w/ badge fees pay for the beach maintenance, lifeguards the rest of the year, but I do believe the state needs to set the Dune requirements for the entire shore line and all townships and association fees need to help with the cost. However, if an association states they will repair their own dunes and continue to put up 4 ft piles of sand and a dune fence, and call that dune, that is not nearly enough to protect the community behind them.
beachfan
9:56 am on Friday, December 14, 2012
Since most ocean front homes in OB were destroyed, now is the time to set new height requirements and pilings for any homes that close to the ocean. You can still get an ocean view if your home is high enough, but you can't possibly risk all of the other homes for it. The State needs to set the dune height for the state and then set the building code height period. if you are not walking up an incline or ramp to get to the beach, then your dune is too low. Just because you are private does not mean you can make the call for the rest of the township. Water does not pick and choose, it will go through the lowest point. The townships need to work with the private communities to preserve the shoreline, not give them an ultimatum.
-Signed summer renter
Pat S.
10:00 am on Friday, December 14, 2012
Giving the town an easement sounds simple, but since the town refuses to answer the questions we've posed and won't clarify just what is our responsibility and what is Toms River's, signing over our beach would be like signing a contract without reading it beforehand. It just isn't simple or prudent without answers.
andrea
10:16 am on Friday, December 14, 2012
Locals should not have to pay to use any of our beaches!!
Mr. ?
10:23 am on Friday, December 14, 2012
Interesting how I always hear barrier island residents complain about the lack of services they get from Toms River with the high taxes they pay. Now I am hearing it again when you say you paid for and own the beach and paid for and own the roads also, and all you get is garbage (twice a week in summer) and recycling! So the associations snow plow your own roads, police your properties, and own your own fire protection services? No wait, my taxes also pay for that, right? And who now is repairing damaged infrastructure? Is it the associations or Toms River? nothing personal and I am not looking for an argument - just saying.
Jack Wagon
5:52 am on Saturday, December 15, 2012
Barrier islanders don't use schools, which are a significant part of prop. taxes. When it snows, TR makes 1 pass. TR response to the blizzard 2 years ago was a joke. It took an entire week for TR to even make 1 pass with a plow on my street. I don't pay part time taxes, but I get part time services. As a matter of fact, 1/3 of all TR taxes are paid by the barrier island, and no, they don't use many of the services.
BTW - Fire protection is contracted out to Seaside Heights, because TR can't/won't respond in the off-season.
A few years ago, part of Ortley even seceded to Lavallette because TR wasn't providing adequate and timely services such as snow plowing on their streets. The residents took TR to court and won because they proved TR neglect.
TR isn't repairing infrastructure, JCP&L, NJNG, and the state are repairing most of it.
I called public works last summer, and they said my house wasn't even part TR, and had no idea where my house even was on the island. Unreal.
I'm all for secession, let the chips fall where they may.
TR sucks, their response to Sandy sucks, and the mayor is a complete and total idiot.
TastyCakes
10:27 am on Friday, December 14, 2012
I hope that all the bickering between Toms River and the Ortley homeowners is resolved quickly because if another storm comes along before the dunes are completed you probably won't have a home to be fighting about.
Thomas A. Mathis
11:17 am on Friday, December 14, 2012
I would like to point out that the Toms River owned beaches have required the purchase of a beach badge of some type for at least the last 50 years. So all of you who are calling for free beaches are going to be disappointed. That will never happen here.
Rob
11:25 am on Friday, December 14, 2012
Very interesting reading with the varied opinions, but I don't think I've seen anyone say that it's OK to get ahead in this world.
Why shouldn't someone be able to own property at the shore? Why should that person be considered some kind of jerk for having 2 homes possibly? It's about time we go in the other direction and think getting ahead should be the goal, instead of looking for a handout toward equality for all.
Does it stink to see people have what you want? Of course! But then do something about it!
As for the stuff about "owning the roads", I believe the association paid to have them put in.
And before you start ranting 'spoken like one of the haves', I don't live on the island, I don't live at the beach, and I don't have 2 homes.
Pat S.
11:38 am on Friday, December 14, 2012
Mr.? FYI- when I had a car fire, it was Seaside Heights that responded, not Toms River. And please keep in mind that our tax dollars also are paying for those things that you mentioned. We're not looking for handouts, just what other taxpayers have come to expect!
Donna Griffin
12:05 pm on Friday, December 14, 2012
Pat S. - Shared services are paid arrangements. To say that you derive no benefit from Toms River is silly especially now when you need mainlanders more than ever in the rebuilding effort. Granted, the early days could have been handled better but let's face it, Ortley was HAMMERED by Sandy and NO ONE was prepared. Ortley residents could never fund this rebuilding effort on their own if they were their own municipality. Don't ever forget either that mainland properties took a massive hit as well and the majority of those homes were primary residences. Let's all put on our big girl/boy pants and get our beaches rebuilt to a degree that is in the long-term best interests of Ocean County residents.
Jack Wagon
6:23 am on Saturday, December 15, 2012
Donna, it's the other way around, you need barrier islanders in TR. You always did, and you always will if you want to continue receiving the same standard of services you are accustomed to in TR.
TR didn't hesitate in taking my November taxes to provide for mainlanders kids educations because of Sandy. My tax dollars have been disproportionately providing for the "mainland" for way too long.
The mayor of TR could care less about the barrier island residents because they are not his real constituents and his response to Sandy has been horrendous at best compared to other Mayors who's real constituents are on the the barrier island. Lavallette, Seaside Heights & Park, Mantoloking, etc. mayors all answer directly to their constituents on the island. Not TR. This guy just sees the barrier island as the cash cow that it is.
The TR website sucks for information too. I use reverse 911 for Lavellete to find out what is going on.
Jack Wagon
6:23 am on Saturday, December 15, 2012
Access has also been very limited compared to every other township on the island. Seaside H & P is in every day, Mantoloking too. Lavellette is even moving back in FT today. TR still has this hokey schedule that is restrictive and inadequate. I have to drive an extra 20 miles over the Rt. 37 bridge to get to my house, because TR won't let their northern beach residents use the Mantoloking bridge.
I'd be happy to secede from TR. Thrilled actually! The other towns are doing fine on the island, and with the best interest of the island in mind.
taxed-out-the-wazoo
1:04 pm on Friday, December 14, 2012
I still defer to my previous comments above; the Township should protect the community and dump the sand.
But, also as noted in other comments fed/state funds have been used by officials to assist in building/rebuilding other areas which are not open to the public without either a ticket or a fee (thereby limiting "public" access anyway).
So, while I would NEVER agree to anything in perpetuity (btw - no one in the practicing and relevant legal field uses that language anymore...take a CLE class once in a while); if you do, charge a fee (like the Townships do). You can charge whatever you want and thus limit the access anyway.
Also, as noted in my above comments....colleges receive public/taxpayer funds (state and federal) and use applications and tuition to limit its student body; entertainment venues throughout the State used public funds (fed and state) to assist in their building process and charge tickets for entry (while the public is allowed...it is limited to those who can afford to enter)....etc. Quite frankly, the Township does this, too, with its beach badge...it charges AND it has used public funds for a long time; similarly with regard Island Beach STATE Park.
Pat S.
2:30 pm on Friday, December 14, 2012
Donna- my home in Ortley is my primary residence. Please don't assume that all the houses at the beach are only vacation residences.
Donna Griffin
8:37 pm on Friday, December 14, 2012
Pat S - I am not assuming EVERY Ortley home is a vacation residence. What I am saying is that the mainland homes impacted by Sandy are primary residences at a significantly higher percentage than those in Ortley. No insult intended. Just a statement of fact.
Ajv
5:26 pm on Friday, December 14, 2012
@shorefriend maybe since your such a fan we will put all the fing Bennys on your street so they can take up all parking, scream profanity all hours and use your front lawn as a urinal. Is that what your saying. Nice job
Ajv
6:00 pm on Friday, December 14, 2012
@beachfan same for you let Benny stay on your street and use your front lawn for a toilet, if all your interested in is there money. Lets not forget the constant profanity spewing from their mouths. I sure you want your children exposed to all the Bennys positive behavior
Mark
9:44 pm on Friday, December 14, 2012
Pat S......Fire protection is another example of how Toms River Barrier Island Taxpayers get riped off. Here's how the scam works. Toms River Barrier Island Taxpayers pay a portion of their real estate taxes for "fire protection". Combined, these homeowners pay approximately 1 million dollars. Toms River Fire District then "contracts" with the Seaside Heights Volunteer Fire Dept to provide fire protections for Toms River Barrier Island Communities...........the contract is for about $100,000! The nine hundred thousand dollar question is where does the "extra" $900,000. go?????????
Chief Wahoo
9:56 am on Saturday, December 15, 2012
You all have been financially raped for the past 20 years. Too bad you had to wake up because of a disaster. Your nightmare is just beginning as you will have to beat the machine to survive this. Property tax revolt is your best chance and the LOSS should become one barrier island township. Would have been smart to do this BEFORE a disaster but no one wanted to wake up from their fantasy world.
Pat S.
4:58 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
Heard that the new Ortley Beach dunes are already half gone after Wed.storm. Has anyone seen the beach today?