Township: Public Meeting on Beach Easements Would Be 'Counterproductive'
Easements are required for public funds to be spent on replenishment of private beaches
Some residents want a public meeting to discuss the possibility of granting easements on their private property, allowing taxpayer funds to be spent on the replenishment of dunes wiped out by Hurricane Sandy.
Township officials, however, do not favor such a forum.
"To have one big open meeting would be counterproductive with 500 people," Council President Mo Hill said Wednesday night when a resident asked why township officials wouldn't talk about the issue in public.
According to township solicitor Ken Fitzsimmons, the township is legally prohibited from spending taxpayer funds to replenish dunes on private property destroyed by Sandy. That’s no longer a problem should the property owners grant the township an easement.
As a condition of the easement, however, Toms River is requiring property owners to grant the township public access to the beach between the dunes and the Atlantic Ocean in perpetuity.
Residents and businesses aren't ready to give up private beach access without more information. Some, like Ortley Beach resident Pat Suriani, have lost much and are unsure of trusting the township. They want a public meeting on the issue.
"I don't understand why you won't meet with us," said Suriani, who was among the handful of the barrier island residents who wanted to talk about easements with township officials.
The council has repeatedly said during previous meetings that it cannot discuss easements with residents, as that could be seen as the township offering legal advice, something it cannot do.
But residents have said that they don't want advice. They just want a discussion.
"I just don't understand why you can't talk to the taxpayers," Suriani said.
"We clearly articulated our position. We've given them documents," Fitzsimmons said. It is up to the homeowner association lawyers to present the information to those who live in the communities, he said.
Residents in communities considering granting an easement should direct their questions to their lawyers, who would then speak with Fitzsimmons. The township solicitor is accessible and willing to meet with those attorneys, Hill said.
"I think that's the most productive way to do it," Hill said.
"I'm asking the township — where I pay my taxes — to do the right thing and have a public meeting," Suriani said, her remarks drawing applause from some in the audience.
Dune replenishment began on Ortley Beach in November shortly after the township accepted a $1.3 million bid from Earle Asphalt Company. Toms River Engineer Bob Chankalian has said dune replenishment on public property is completed with the township now considering augmenting the tidal shelf to prevent the new dunes from being washed away.
"If we get the easements signed, we can get the Army Corps of Engineers to come and rebuild the beach and rebuild the dunes," Hill said. "I think from all that we've heard, they're ready, willing and able but it's a problem with the easements."
A wider beach and 20-foot high dunes could prevent serious flooding like what was seen during Sandy. But it would only work if all of the about 30 entities along the beach in Ortley grant easements. If one or a few sections of dune are not built like the rest, rising waters would find a way inland, officials have said.
Seaside Park, with its dunes of that size, experienced less damage compared to other coastal areas, Hill said. The Army Corps would dredge the ocean floor, pumping sand on to the beach. Officials have said that this would help to protect the barrier island and bayfront areas.
"If we don't get these easements, they're not coming in," Hill said.
Bill Storm,
6:52 am on Thursday, December 27, 2012
People WAKE UP! The party is over. If you don't give the easments to build up the dunes, when the next storm hits you will be responsable for any flooding damage to everybody on the barrier island. The township, county, state and federal government can then come back and seize your property, not allowing you to rebuild and hold you responsable for being STUPID.
Angelo Turello
9:11 am on Thursday, December 27, 2012
Does that also mean that they will be responsible for damage to bayfront homes? So the ocean fron people will pay for all the damage to the rest of the entire barrier island? Wow , thats a pretty good deal.
butch cassidy
10:24 am on Thursday, December 27, 2012
come on people sounds like it is a no brainer..get the dunes built or this flooding will never end..example the last 2 storms today and last week
kyrstinreindl
2:25 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013
If you think Catherine`s story is nice, , 1 week ago my sisters girlfriend easily made $9754 working a 10 hour week from their apartment and their best friend's mother`s neighbour was doing this for nine months and got a cheque for over $9754 in there spare time from there computer. use the guidelines at this address. www.Ask22.ℂom
Florence Roth
11:37 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
I live in Silver Beach. I believe that most of our association residents plan on funding our own dune replenishment. By signing this easement we are allowing our private beaches to become public. This will devalue our homes in the long run and will take away from revenue that our own associations make. The Township of Toms River has been taking advantage of Barrier Island residents for years. We have the highest taxes in the township and the most minimal services. Toms River should be assisting us without forcing us to sign an easement. Without the tax revenue they have been collecting from the private beach associations for all these years Toms River wouldn't be where it is today.
Martin
7:27 am on Thursday, December 27, 2012
Bayfront homes also suffer when there are no dunes. As a flooded Silverton resident, I resent the selfishness of the opponents on the barrier island . Get rid of your 19th century ideas.
Peter S
7:48 am on Thursday, December 27, 2012
Unfortunately this article neglects a significant conversation held last night about the lack of a concrete plan by the Township to get Ortley Beach back. It is unacceptable to be 8+ weeks into this and not have a plan to get a large section of the Barrier Island home!
Bob
7:49 am on Thursday, December 27, 2012
Army Corp of Engineers has a form letter which addresses all concerns about the unilaterally worded easements and this letter confirms easement is ONLY for beach replenishment and further there will be NO STRUCTURES allowed other than dunes. This letter is made part of the easement contract and should resolve all of the beachfront homeowners worries!!!! So sign the easement!!!!!!
Pat Suriani
7:59 am on Thursday, December 27, 2012
I have been Misquoted....my comment was that people on the barrier island mistrust Toms River and their intentions. Having a public meeting might clear up any misconceptions and help get the dune replenishment accomplished so that everyone is safe. I in no way mistrust my homeowners association , I was there to represent them and I am on the Board of Trustees.
Also, Bob can you direct me to where that form letter from the Army Corp of Engineers can be found, I would appreciate the help!!!!!!!
Pat Suriani
Doug Bennett
6:15 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
You are only getting what you deserve. As long as you want to live in your little private enclave, pay for it yourself. You people have caused enough damage to the mainland because of all your garbage the storm sent across the bay. And you worry about cigarette butts and water bottles on your personal beach. That garbage should be on you...not Toms River...not Brick...you! You should be paying to clean it up. I would be happy to see everything from Bay Head south look like Island Beach State Park and that's all I would want to pay for.
John
8:19 am on Thursday, December 27, 2012
No one should own a beach should be there for every one there should be no building on the beach build up the dunes to save the rest of the towne
Angelo Turello
9:02 am on Thursday, December 27, 2012
John, does that apply to lake front, river front or bay front beaches? Or do we just selectively trample the constitutional rights of ocean front homeowners?
Michael Capo
9:50 am on Thursday, December 27, 2012
What about lake front property, or bay front property or river front property or do we only selectively trample on the constitutional rights of ocean front property owners?
Mrs. G.
10:12 am on Thursday, December 27, 2012
They can own anything they want as long as they pay for it AND its upkeep. I resent paying for anything I am not able to access.
Steve
12:34 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012
Aside from your awful grammar and sentence structure your argument is invalid. There are many examples of privately owned waterfront property including Seaside Heights which charges a fee for beach access. The only true public beach that I am aware of on the barrier island is Island Beach State Park.
Ana Prodani
12:48 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012
Like Communism..it sounds great in theory, but in reality it doesn't work. It's not fair that the public should enjoy a beach we pay to maintain and leave behind the trash for us to pick up. Where would they park? In our driveways? We pay to maintain our private roads, trash pick up, lifegaurds,dune replenishing,etc... I for one am sick of having to get up every morning to comb the beach with garbage bag in hand so my daughter and grandson don't step on or pick up litter such as used condoms left behind by late night beach goers or cans and sandwich bags, cigarette butts, water bottles,etc... I don't like worrying about my car being broken into yet again by passer byes. My neighbor did not enjoy finding a drunk stranger using his backyard shower at four in the morning. I hate having to chase off kids having sex on my deck! Cars broken into and stolen personal property are a common event. Now you expect us to grant beach access, can you even imagine what that would create? If society would act responsibly we would not care about going public, but that is not the case.
Sue
8:06 am on Friday, December 28, 2012
See multiple-personality (form letter) comment below. Lakes don't need dunes to protect homes from ocean waves. My constitutional right is "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" and being flooded out impinges on that right. Dunes won't impinge on oceanfront homeowners' right for the same, just their ocean view. Tough -- my safety trumps your view. Thousands of bay and mainland homes were flooded because the ocean surge went through unprotected areas lacking dunes.
Donna Griffin
8:46 am on Thursday, December 27, 2012
I am sure if the beachfront property owners were to ask the township for a recommended attorney to use in order to "further the discussion" they would be more than happy to refer them to one of their pals. Answering questions posed by taxpayers is part of the job. Certainly the town leaders are savvy enough to do so without "practicing" law. Those dunes need to go back up and they need to go back up NOW. It is a public safety issue for those businesses and homes west of the oceanfront properties. We do not have 6 months to chat about this and after last night's storm I'd hazard to say that Mother Nature is chomping at the bit to make the decision for everyone. FIX THEM NOW.....FIGHT LATER!!!
Ortley Full Time Local
8:51 am on Thursday, December 27, 2012
Pat Suriani should stop at West Marine and buy lifejackets for all of her Condo Assn.......they'll need them if they don't give the ok for the dunes. When you say how stupid can people be, you only have to look at Pat Suriani and the rest of her assn.
Peter S
9:03 am on Thursday, December 27, 2012
Ortley Full Time Local- Personal attacks are unnecessary, grow up!
Angelo Turello
9:05 am on Thursday, December 27, 2012
calling names anonymously is a great tactic
butch cassidy
10:27 am on Thursday, December 27, 2012
sounding selfish and ridiculous to me seriously override them and vote in the easements and dune building please before there is no longer any jersey shore
Mark
9:09 am on Thursday, December 27, 2012
Well if the Toms River Council does not want a public meeting to discuss the easements, then there should be a public meeting to discuss how Toms River Township plans on protecting homes west of the "dune-less" areas. TR can't not say to those taxpayers "sorry you're on your own" What's plan B? There has to be an alternative. Unfortunately TR is "hiding" behind the lack of easements to do absolutely nothing!
Angelo Turello
9:23 am on Thursday, December 27, 2012
true
Ortley Full Time Local
9:16 am on Thursday, December 27, 2012
Not signing the easement is stupid! The army corp is not going to hang around waiting for these selfish people to decide whats good for their silly private beach.. Get what you can NOW from the army corp to protect yourselves and deal with TR later. Some things will never change. TR will always be a problem.
Ana Prodani
12:11 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012
Ortley Resident-- We do not have enough information to even consider sighning it. We brought the letter to our association attorney whom couldn't guide us because the letter received from the town was so vague. Also full time local, you need to know that all the dunes in the world will not protect your property as long as the town leaves the beach access ramps unprotected during a storm, which is exactly what happened here. The town dumps loose sand at the openings hours before a storm and expects that to keep the surge at bay...the water breached at those openings and eroded the dunes to the right and left. Our dune was 210ft across, 26ft high, 150ft wide. It was held in place by bulkheads grounded by seagrass and huge Bayberry bushes. The water breached at the ramp on Harding causing the dunes to the right and left of it to erode. As long as those ramps remain unprotected during a storm the properties on the island as well as our infastructure will remain vulnarable.
Angelo Turello
9:21 am on Thursday, December 27, 2012
Toms River's first attempt at discussing this vital issue with us was to notify our association on Tuesday before Thanksgiving that we needed to give them an easement or they wouldn't fix the dunes . They wanted an answer by the following Monday. With 200 plus members scattered all over the state, how were we to organize discussion and vote on this matter? Talk about holding a gun to someones head.....
If Toms River would have allowed Ortley to secede years ago like we wanted to do they wouldn't be dealing with us now. But the property taxes they collected all these years were too inviting. So now its time to treat us like full time tax paying residents and its a problem.
jaime
10:03 am on Thursday, December 27, 2012
as a tax payer i am sick of my tax dollars going to replenish privet beaches..... my taxes should be going to schools or the TR police dep. for stopping the looters after the storm or to the Silverton Fire house for everything they did for us here in Silverton and so on and so forth. all who have a privet beach should pay to fix your beach!!!! no tax payer pays to fix my back yard so why should we the people pay to fix yours!!!!!!!
Steve
12:48 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012
@Jaime - I disagree with you on your argument. While on the surface it would seem valid that public funds should not be used on a private beach, it is an overly simplistic premise. In this case 1) The barrier island communities part of TR pay a disproportionate amount of taxes to the township 2) Although the beach is private the tourism generated by the private beach used by summer renters and additional visitors provides additional revenue to all the surrounding area around Tom's River which, in turn, increases tax revenue to the town. So how can it be considered fair that TR should enjoy all of the fiscal benefits but none of the responsibilities?
TR Voice of Reason
11:14 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012
@Steve, the homeowners always had the option of selling those homes and paying a "disproportionate" amount of taxes in a different Oceanfront town. That's life, oceanviews cost more and they also command high rents that the homeowners pocket. In this case the rubber is meeting the proverbial road or in our case the ocean met the bay and whatever is best for the majority of the taxpayers is what should happen. In case anyone has forgotten there are far more waterfront and bay front homes on the mainland of TR and we deserve protection from the flooding also. Btw we spend money in TR 12 months a year and pay far more taxes then our non-waterfront neighbors. It's a choice some of us made and right now we are all living with the consequences :( We need to Rebuild conscientiously or stay mired in litigation for years where only the attorneys come out winners. That's if we last that long without the proper dune protection.
Donna Griffin
9:29 am on Thursday, December 27, 2012
Why doesn't the town replenish the dunes on the private ocean beaches and bill the property owners accordingly for the expense? If they choose not to pay for the costs involved, then do as they would with property taxes that fall in arrears, i.e. tax sale notices. I cannot see the coordination of heavy equipment from multiple contractors on the beaches for separate associations, businesses and homeowners being a successful solution. If your lawn grows to a certain unacceptable height, then the township has ordinances which allow them on the property to mow it and subsequently bill the land owner. I'd say that the dunes are a bit more important than 12" blades of grass. To make it a land grab issue is overreaching.
Mark
9:31 am on Thursday, December 27, 2012
The TR Council is totally clueless.Other than hiring a company to place some sand on the beach and another to collect the garbage, what have they done since the storm to restore the infrastructure? The were shamed into providing portable toilets. What's the plans for Ocean Ave, for the boardwalk, the lifeguard houses? Who knows. I seriously think that seceding from this dysfunctional government has to be part of our discussion.
Ortley Full Time Local
9:48 am on Thursday, December 27, 2012
Mark, that was tried many years ago. Not enough people get involved until something like this storm occurs. It probably will never happen. I've lived here 43+ years. TR IS and always will be a non caring burden on Ortley. Time to get what we can from the army corp. Protect our butts and homes. No sense fighting TR if there is nothing left of Ortley.
jaime
10:07 am on Thursday, December 27, 2012
can't fix the roads with out fixing the duns first or the roads can be washed away again it's commonsense. tell all your beach front owners to fix there privet beaches and we can move on... lost my home because the dunes were not properly replenished!!!!!!!!!!
TR Voice of Reason
12:38 am on Friday, December 28, 2012
Mark, Ortley shouldn't talk about seceding because it takes more to fund a town then picking up garbage and the year round residents of TR fund much of what hapoens over there because their are a lot more of us. For example, now the mainland of TR only has garbage pick up once a week in the summer however since many homeowners in Ortley enjoy the profits of weekly summer rentals, they have their garbage picked up twice a week. This council cares more about all of TR including Ortley then some of you want to admit. I attended that council meeting when TR mainland residents complained about the disparity in garbage pickup and the council stood their ground. Also in case anyone forgot, there are kids in Ortley "year round" who attend TR schools, do you think it would be cheaper for Ortley to pay another district? Either we unite and literally battle Mother Nature together or divide and be destroyed by her. That's about as simple as this horrible situation gets :(
TRWatch
9:53 am on Thursday, December 27, 2012
When the council wants something, they have no problem packing the meeting hall with hundreds of their friends. And, why is Hill speaking on behalf of the beach residents?
Ortley Full Time Local
10:07 am on Thursday, December 27, 2012
If TR will not meet with the 200 plus members of the assn....why hasn't the assn. showed up at a council meeting like the one held last night and force a meeting then and now?. Too busy? Don't care? Where is your lawyer? Please sign the easement! Go to a council meeting with your 200+ members!!!!
Pat S.
10:08 am on Thursday, December 27, 2012
Ortley Full Time Local- first of all, were you in attendance at this meeting? As a taxpayer, you should be appalled at the town's unwillingness to discuss matters openly with their constituents. Secondly, Pat Suriani's association is not a condo association alone; there are private homes that make up the association as well. With the amount of tax dollars Toms River collects from it, the least we can expect is clarification about aspects of the deal. Also, you need to be aware of the fact if we do give an easement, our association will still have to maintain the beach, pay for lifeguards, and badge checkers, and increase our insurance to cover Toms River beachgoers- Toms River will cover none of these expenses, it will come totally out of our pockets. So to say we're being selfish, if not wanting to turn over our beach for which we will still have to pay the expenses to maintain and operate, and doing this without the town giving us answers to the questions we need answered, then yes, we are selfish and want to protect what we worked hard to own!
Ortley Full Time Local
10:19 am on Thursday, December 27, 2012
Yes I was there. Your shared expenses are part of the problem when you live within a condo assn. Those issues are your concern. I pay for all my expenses living in a single family home. The dunes will protect the entire community. Whats important to you.....paying a lifeguard or your property?
letsgetreal
5:47 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012
I have to agree with Ortley Full Time Local on this one. For those who own property on the private controlled beaches buy or (inherit) these homes with the understanding that it is their financial responsibility to maintain, control, and improve the beach, dunes and yes the sand. So yes why should the tax payers who don't live on the beach pay for this! You cannot have it both ways, you want private beaches (which I understand why, trust me) but don't want to adhere to the agreement that goes with owning a home in these private communities. It would be like going to Atlantic City and putting all your money on Red and when black comes up asking the house to give you money back because you don't understand the game?! The entire beach YES ALL OF IT needs to be fixed by the Army Corp so not signing this agreement is foolish and selfish, I hardly doubt thousands of people are going to rush onto your private beaches any time soon come on common sense has to prevail at some point. Just sayin
TR Voice of Reason
12:43 am on Friday, December 28, 2012
@letsgetreal Amen!
1stcav
10:09 am on Thursday, December 27, 2012
For the good of ALL these dunes HAVE to be replaced , you can fight later as to whether there will be a beach charge for using them or if there YOUR'S and private !If public funds are used they belong to ALL to protect and use...You can't HAVE your cake and eat it too !!!!!! Don't replenish and then there will be NO beach at all to charge people to be on. Your choice , but those behind those water front homes want protection and can't see the beach anyway...they just want to be protected from the sea...
John
10:26 am on Thursday, December 27, 2012
Angelo Turello lakes & bays donot wipe out houses & streets like the ocean did giver me a break you know what iam talking about.
Howdy Do
10:41 am on Thursday, December 27, 2012
What are you talking about? I live in Green Island and my 2 Bayfromt neighbors had their homes destroyed by Sandy. Both homes have to be demolised.
Donna Griffin
1:00 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012
John - You need to get in your car and go for a ride to the mainland. My folks are in the Baywood section of Brick and when Mantoloking Bridge breached the water rose as fast as if it were a tsunami. If you want to see damage, this side of the bridge was hit as hard as most barrier island communities. There is a vested interest for mainlanders, and we must be part of the discussions on dune replenishment.
Pat S.
10:50 am on Thursday, December 27, 2012
Ortley FullTime Local- perhaps if you read what I wrote, yor would see that we all do not occupy condos. The majority of members are owners of private homes as I am. We share expenses on common property such as the beach. Our homes are our own responsibility as should be. To say that we should just turn over our beach which was bought legally, for which each member paid an assessment, is easy to say. Would you just give the public access to your property, and maintain it, pay insurance for the public to use, etc.without getting answers as to what your responsibilities are? We are not saying we won't give access, but we need answers as to what this involves. Mr. Fitzsimmons keeps saying that he cannot give legal advice; we are NOT asking for advice, just clarification! Would you sign a contract without reading all it entails?
John
11:26 am on Thursday, December 27, 2012
The only thing toms river cares about is the tax dolor that got us in this mess in the first place houses on the beach pay a lot of tax that's all they care about
John
11:47 am on Thursday, December 27, 2012
If they think they own the beach why should taxpayers pay for it no taxpayer is paying to fix my house. But. Me
Pat S.
11:58 am on Thursday, December 27, 2012
I think that Toms River has succeeded (although it was probably through dumb luck rather than planning) to further divide its citizens all to TR's advantage. They're pitting mainlanders against barrier islanders, and then public beach islanders against private associations. The big offender is the township! Through greed they allowed the barrier island to grow and grow with no care about maintaining dunes and building a bigger beach; tax money is the issue and not safety. Let's take the true offenders to task. Toms River has failed its constituents on many levels and they finally have to answer why, and what is going to be done to remedy the problem. They are hiding behind the beach access/dune replenishment instead of looking at what the town itself should be planning/doing to move forward.
I have spoken
2:15 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012
Toms River is not the offender here. The private associations are. Maybe more intelligent people in these associations should over throw their president and sign the easement. No easement.....No clean-up, no dune. My tax dollars have no place being used for your private beach. Pat if I was you I'd install pontoons under your home because the next time....You on your own!!!
Mark
3:29 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012
"I have spoken" TR Township is definitely the offender! Their failure to maintain the dunes in the first place is what caused most of the devastation. Look at how hard the area around Harding Ave was hit...why because there was no dunes on Harding by the beach entrance. In fact it was totally open to allow vehicle access. The same could be said by Fielder etc etc. TR Township is guilty of Neglect, Malfeasance & Incompetence to name a few. The TR engineer apparently never noticed that the dune system was inadequate at best! He's been the Township engineer for over 10 years! Why is he still employed by TR?
Lookout
4:55 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012
What are you talking about? I live in Snug Harbor , not the barrier Island. My house had water in it again today. Yes mainland Toms River 25 year resident. Sick of this, and my Ward rep whom is as lame as they come. Please tell me we can vote these council people out next year?
Ana Prodani
5:34 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
Mark, you are the only person other than myself that has brought this up...thank you!
Ana Prodani
5:48 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
I Have Spoken-- Mark is correct. 12 homes to the right and left of the Harding beach access ramp were completely washed away thanks to TR inability to protect the community. I stood there the Sunday before the storm and watched the water breach. The homes and streets located behind the Ortley public beach have TR to blame for the catastrophic loss they have suffered. TR officials are calling Ortley ground zero. I agree, but not because the 1000 MILE WIDE STORM was any stronger in Ortley. We are at ground zero because our town whom we pay taxes to did not protect us! Lavalette which is a few blocks north of Ortley suffered minor damage compared to us. Do you honestly believe the storm happened to be stronger there. They were better protected, that is the truth.
Coreen Onnembo
12:00 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012
As a homeowner in a 3 unit condo that was knocked off it's foundation and condemned by TR I plead with you to sign & get the dune building started. Right now we're still waiting to have the house knocked down & every storm the lot fills with water preventing us from gathering any personal belongings still left in our homes.The emotional & financial heardbreak we are all enduring from monsterous Sandy is bad enough without the battle between TR mainland & Ortley beach. We pay a majority of the school taxes for TR without any benefits so PLEASE stop the poisons you send us on these pages. The whole Jersey shore suffered...it's just Ortley that has been abandoned. God bless us all & bring us a happier 2013.
Donna Griffin
1:03 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012
Amen, Coreen. However, Ortley does not pay the "majority" of school taxes for Toms River. We're an awfully big municipality and as far as property taxes go....we will all be paying for Sandy's wrath....including those of us who were lucky enough to sustain zero damage.
Mark
3:36 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012
Donna, Actually FEMA will be picking up most of TR Townships expenses. In fact many many taxpayers believe that TR is delaying the "re-population" of Ortley Beach so that the Township could keep the FEMA tab going (ie police, emergency mgmt, public works ot) going!
Want to know why the dunes were "rebuilt" to its original and inadequate height? Because that was all FEMA was willing to reimburse the Township. Seems to make a lot of sense rebuild them just like they were before because TR does not want to spend any of their (our) money to build the dunes higher and wider! Bunce of incompetent political hack if you ask me!
Donna Griffin
4:51 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012
Honestly, Mark...Ortley Beach was HAMMERED by Sandy. Much moreso than Lavallette and SSP. I understand the need to keep the public away for safety sake and for the heavy equipment operators to do their jobs. I know it is going at a snail's pace. I know that the Toms River honchos could take a lesson from Lavallette's mayor. However, the oceanfront, as you said, has been ignored for nearly two decades. I've lived here for 30 years and am unaware of the barrier island residents screaming for higher dunes anywhere in OB...dunes that will ultimately destroy any view of the ocean. Ortley Beach residents ought not have a decision in dune restoration. NO oceanfront community should be involved in that decision. The Army Corps of Engineers need to make the determination and let the residents go crazy when 20 ft. dunes are placed in front of their homes. IT'S NOT THEIR CALL! Again...it is a matter of public safety!
CONCERNED 3RD PARTY
12:10 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012
So it seem everyone want to dismiss the fact that the private beach associations have paid taxes for over 60 years and have only received garbage pick-up and snow plowing services from the township. They have to pay for any services related to roads or the beach. The other factor you are failing to recognize is if the township or federal agencies do not rebuild the dunes, they will be ineffective. I was in Ortley today and already you can see major erosion to the new dunes. I understand why the township can’t use the money to redo the private beaches dunes, however, there can be a way to resolve this issue without hold those communities hostage. NEGOTIATION!
jerseystrong
3:29 pm on Friday, January 4, 2013
Seriously, what other services do you not get that a homeowner in ortley gets outside of the private community? do the police come to your rescue if called? Will the fire department come to your house if it's burning down. I am a home owner in ortley and TAKE CARE of my property - driveway, backyard and all. I'm sick and tired of hearing about how you pay taxes and don't get any benefits. The town doesn't do anything different for me or anyone else. Sell your house and move someplace else. Good riddance.
Pat Bansch
12:18 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012
OMG I can't believe easements are the discussion here when Toms River doesn't even have a plan in place to get utilities back to Ortley? WHere are your priorites? I'm so disgusted with Toms River administration and their lake of response to the homeowners of Ortley Beach!
Peter S
1:20 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012
The lack of a plan is appalling and was raised earlier in this email chain and in the meeting last night. Having a meeting with the utilities on 1/4/13 will not result in a concrete plan to get us back in. The township needs a sense of urgency and resources, both of which seem to be lacking.
Michael Capo
2:05 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012
Well if you are looking for a united front, don't expect the OBVTA to step up. I contacted them and they responded to me that they are pleased as punch with the job that Toms River is doing.
Michael Capo
2:27 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012
Toms River is perfectly happy to have these dialogs continue about the "private beaches". The verbal jousting between islanders and mainlanders only helps them avoid stepping up to the many non-beach related issues" This way they can avoid the spotlight being pointed to them for the lack of a plan to restore utilities, roads and access in general. The answer I read in the paper was "we have no control over those things". Maybe we need the State to appoint a real , capable, effective management team to do what Toms River is unable or unwilling to do. Sort of like they do when they take over management of poorly run school districts.
Ana Prodani
5:53 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
We all want out of Toms River....Demand it!!!
TRWatch
12:47 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012
Negotiate a tax break for the easements, that is what I would do If I were oceanfront.
I have spoken
2:17 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012
Heck NO.....That's blackmail.
Ana Prodani
6:04 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
First off the majority of Ortley beach residents are oceanside, not oceanfront. Secondly we all had dunes, higher than the 20 foot dunes TR recently built. Thirdly we are simply asking for a meeting or at least a better understanding of what the town expects from us should we decide to grant beach access. No one in their right minds would sign a legal document without full disclosure. Why does anyone find this so difficult. Even the attorneys that have read the letter refuse to offer legal council because the letter is so vague.
kat
1:24 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012
"A foolish man. . .built his house upon the sand and the rain fell and the floods came and the winds blew and beat against that house and it fell; and great was the fall of it." Mt. 7:26-7. Beach dwellers expected something different??? Of course they do! They believe the community should bear the cost of maintaining their property while they deny access to their personal beach. The barrier island is nothing more than nature's protective strip for the mainland. Not to mention that most of it is an over-built eye sore that blocks views of nature's beauty. Beach owners gambled when they invested in tidal property, and they lost. Only a fool would think that the Constitution protects us from bad investments. The most prudent choice for Toms River is to condemn every building in Ortley, Chadwick, Normandy, etc. and create public parks. After another storm or two, the state will follow with the smaller municipalities, which are corporate creations of the state, and in time the entire barrier island will be Island Beach State Park. Hotels and restaurants can be relocated on the other side of the bridges, and everyone can enjoy the beach without worrying about the cost of rebuilding every time a storm hits. The mainland will be better protected, and the taxpayers will stop wasting money to support the dream of selfish, greedy, self aggrandizing people who feel entitled to their own personal beach front property but do not have the personal means to maintain it.
Ana Prodani
1:53 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012
Wonderful idea, but how will you make up the lost revenue and taxes collected from your so called "selfish, greedy, self aggrandizing people." Puerto Rico had the same idea when they forced the American Army base out of their barrier island of Vieques and now they are begging the US to make them the 51st state because they're bankrupt.
Michael Capo
2:07 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012
Why doesn't Toms River do everyone a huge favor, the mainlanders as well as the islanders....let us all secede from Toms River. ...... Problem solved for Toms River.
kat
2:24 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012
@ana prodani: With all the damage to Ortley, the snails pace at which recovery progresses, decreased assessments, and the extraordinary cost to the township for Ortley’s cleanup, there will not be much in the way of revenues from Ortley for some time. It is a loss on both sides. The issue is bigger than just Ortley Beach and whatever tax dollars you think buy you the right to continue your madness. The issue is the imprudence of building and living on sand bars and expecting others to pay for your bad decisions. If you want to live on the beach then insure it at your own expense (not taxpayer subsided flood insurance) and pay for your own replenishment. If you cannot do that then you cannot afford your beach house.
Seriously?
3:27 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012
Spot on. The arrogance and entitlement mentality of those living the entire length of the barrier island is breathtaking. All for what -- the so-called "right" to own a shack on the beach? I think the Army Corps of Engineers should walk away from this, and when the next major "superstorm" hits -- and it definitely will -- sit on the mainland with binoculars and watch all those private association communities wash into the ocean. Then condemn all the properties and as kat states, turn it all into one big state or national park. It will all look nicer too, instead of the overcrowded, sleazy, traffic-congested place that it has become over the last 35 years.
kat
3:53 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012
@Seriously. When the ocean breached the island, that was nature's way of cleaning out the pollution from the upper bay. I will never understand why is was deemed necessary to have the Army Core of Engineers to interfere with that environmental improvement--and I am no environmentalist.
Ana Prodani
6:29 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
@kat-- We have and will continue to pay for all of our expenses. As for my home,insurance is taking care of that, but because we too pay taxes we expect to be protected. TR left the the access ramp open at Harding which caused our dune to erode. Our dune was adjacent to the public ramp which was not protected. That opening is where the water breached causing the erosion of dunes located on the right and the left of the ramp. Building a new dune will be of no protection to the communities unless the ramps are properly protected during a storm. TR also needs to build and maintain better dunes than the ones they had prior to the storm. Ours was the largest on the island and was braced by bulkheads. Lavalette officials should be commended for the dune maintenance which better protected their community.
Ana Prodani
6:32 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
Good luck with that....Jersey Strong...we will rebuild bigger and better!
Denise
1:54 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012
Toms River has been relying on the barrier islands for support with the excessive taxes we pay and for that roads are not even plowed during snow storms. It is about time Toms River stepped up and took care of the mouth that feeds them.
I have spoken
2:21 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012
@Denise....WRONG....you have been under paying your taxes for many years. It's about time the reassessment made it right!
Ana Prodani
2:24 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012
Because the tax revenue lost from the barrier island homeowners would have to be paid by the mainland residents in order to maintain the schools, infastructure and all else.
Seriously?
7:15 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012
Those houses were originally built as SUMMER COTTAGES -- not year-round homes. Four walls and a roof, with an indoor toilet and an outdoor shower. At the end of the season you were supposed to shut off the utilities and leave, not to return until the next summer. You all got the brilliant idea to upgrade those houses and live down there full time. This puts an additional strain on an already strained public works department, which can barely keep up when there's a major blizzard on the mainland.
You can't have it both ways -- you think that because you pay association fees you have the right to control dune replenishment but expect the township to bail you out so your house doesn't float down the street in the next storm. You know what? Don't sign the easement -- I think after the next few bad storms the beach will look absolutely beautiful completely devoid of beach shacks.
TR Voice of Reason
1:31 am on Friday, December 28, 2012
@Seriously, you are exactly right but unfortunately it won't just be their houses that suffer if the easements aren't granted.
letsgetreal
8:57 am on Saturday, December 29, 2012
Ahhhh....yea OK...the beach community has been paying lower taxes for years and that is why there was a reassessment (Thats FACT) and many of your taxes had risen. Though I agree the increase was sharp and to much right away, it should have had a 4 year roll in but then again with all luxuries comes a price!
SystemIsBroken
2:21 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012
They dont have to sign the easement but The alternative is buy your own dump truck and start hauling your own sand, because WE aint paying to protect your personal beach!
Your personal precious beach is gone WHAAAAA! Lets have a pity party!
Ana Prodani
6:35 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
Hate to brake it to you, but the beach is still there and the homes, thanks to our insurance companies will only be newer, better and bigger then ever!
Chief Wahoo
2:35 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012
I would never give into the town. They either pay to fix the dunes or every paying taxpayer will suffer the consequences when the next storms flood thru. Why pay property taxes and insurance premiums if the money never comes back to you when an emergency hits. Seems to be a scam of major proportions. Fix the dunes NOW !!!!!!
Rudolph Krystal
2:54 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012
I am part of a beach association in Toms River and we pay dues to maintain the beach and for access, I also pay Toms River taxes. We sell beach badges to anyone who wants to go, so it is a public beach already.
The problem with the easement is this "Toms River is requiring property owners to grant the township public access to the beach between the dunes and the Atlantic Ocean in perpetuity"
The public already has access, just buy a badge and you are on. Once we sign away in perpetuity is when we start to get screwed. Then we will have to provide public bathrooms and parking, who is going to pay for that?
Seriously?
3:30 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012
Too bad. Suck it up or buy a canoe. Better yet, sell your house while you can, because without the easement, your house will be gone in a year or two anyway in the next storm.
I have spoken
3:15 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012
Hey Rudolph....sign the easement or buy pontoons for under your house. You're already screwed. We the majority have spoken to the elected officials, wrote emails and they have listened. OUR tax dollars will NEVER go to your private beach. Waaaaa Waaaaav Waaaaa.
Ana Prodani
6:36 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
Don't need to, we can afford to build new ones without signing anything.
letsgetreal
9:01 am on Saturday, December 29, 2012
I don't think this is about pointing fingers, and I think turning our backs on the beach community is not a good idea. With that said, I feel that this is a time where reality has to become the forefront of common sense and the easement has to be signed. If your association Lawyer is not capable of reading the agreement at hand then he has an obligation to find one that does. I do not think the beach residents have much of a choice here. The longer you debate this the closer you get to another Storm. Just sayin
robert curran
3:37 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012
I have a great idea! Why don't we just give the the private beaches to Seaside Heights?That way TR will lose the hundreds of thousands a year it gets for doing nothing for private beach owners and couldn't tax a municipality.The value of the private beach owners propery would tank & save them money on property taxes.
I'm sure Seaside would gladly replenish the beaches in view of the thousands they'd
make on the beach badges every summer.
Since I don't live on the bay--I think they should put up 10' high levees all along the bay front to avoid future damage.
Johnjcpa
3:55 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012
By the time the arguing stops, there won't be a firm on the east coast that has the capability to replenish the sand and then build sufficient dunes that isn't booked for years.
If you didn't want to pay taxes to Toms River, then you shouldn't buy property in Toms River. Local communities taxing property based on assessments isn't a new concept, nobody created the system overnight.
You can keep up the criticism if you really think that insulting someone is the best way to work out a solution.
I'd suggest having your associations get representation and do whatever is necessary or you won't see anything done to the beach and dunes for years. You are going to need a beach as wide as a football field to get half of it for dunes and half for beach.
letsgetreal
9:04 am on Saturday, December 29, 2012
You make total sense here Johnjcpa. Sadly a lot of people are letting the words "beach Access" get in the way of common sense thinking. And the taxes are high for a reason, a lot of services go into maintaining Ortley which has 2500 houses approximately and your right there did not just magically appear those taxes.
Pat S.
5:22 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012
Some of you keep missing the point- the associations are not asking for tax money to be used for the private beaches; we understand the law! What we want is Toms River to talk to us about what this public access means pertaining to the beaches becoming open for public access. We are expected to pay for the maintenance, lifeguards, etc., but we aren't supposed to ask questions or expect answers to them! Would you just turn over your property without wanting some information about the parameters of the agreement? If Toms River can't or won't give us answers, then we can't make an informed decision. That is what we are asking for!
letsgetreal
9:06 am on Saturday, December 29, 2012
Pat,
Maybe I am wrong but I thought the Twp has already indicated that they had a plan in place and that the proposal is something your association attorney must review? The Twp is probably the last place I would want to debate this due to the fact that they are only going to go back to the Town attorney anyway and its going to delay this further for you guys sadly.
Pat S.
6:18 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012
kat- if building on a barrier island is such a bad idea, maybe the state of NJ and the municipalities with beachfront property should have made it illegal for individuals to do so. But the idea of the almighty tax revenue they could collect must have clouded their thinking. How about taking them to task rather than the people who legally purchased the land.
kat
1:04 am on Friday, December 28, 2012
Pat S.--Let’s face it, we only vote for and support those politicians who will do our bidding. Politicians, homeowners, developers are all in this together. Blaming others is simply obfuscation. Legally purchasing land or anything else is no guarantee that your investment will pay off. My ideas about not building on a sand bar are not novel and are gaining traction in indemnity circles as well as in public policy discussions. The cost to the community is simply too high in an era of weak economics and a severe storm cycle. The handwriting is on the wall with this easement and you will lose eventually.
butch cassidy
7:11 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012
who is the head of emergency management for ortley? is it the same person as toms river? that person should be doing something about all this..its a darn shame
Mark
9:09 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012
Paul Daley is in charge of TR Townships Office of Emergency Mgmt and was also named overall co-ordinater of the recovery from Sandy. Ortley beach does not have a seperate OEM.
(732) 341-3267
pdaley@trpolice.org.
Lori Noel Lewkowitz
5:17 am on Saturday, December 29, 2012
Gee whiz, more than eight weeks after the storm and now we learn that there is actually an OEM person. Where's he been? I've only seen Chief Mastronardy working like a banshee. The barrier island needs its own OEM. How is it humanly possible for this Paul Daley person to be able to handle it all?
barbara
7:12 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012
Ok, Toms River Council, let's get some answers for us homeowners in Toms River, not on the water, who were slammed by Sandy, flooded again last Friday and now again today. Trying to rebuild and keep getting knocked down. Already spent close to $20,00 since Sandy and lots more to do. Will my house which i rent to my son ever be habital again? That friggin bay keeps backing up onto Windsor Avenue. We are at our wits end.......and my son and girlfriend and daughter homeless, living with me. not to mention my in laws from seaside who have not been able to do anything with their home yet cause of stupid rules and regulations, they also homeless and frustrated, luckily got a rental till May. My family been busting their asses to try to make our house liveable again, then today, bam! There goes the sheet rock they spent all day on sunday putting up. this friggin sucks. would love a public meeting. something needs to be done. sick of it.......
Mark
9:17 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012
Barbara, Sadly the Toms River Council and the so called Mayor do not have answers. Sadly they are allowing the Dept Heads ( Police Chief, OEM, Public Works) etc etc run things and sadly they are all in over their respective heads.
They need to keep the FEMA tab running hence keeping Ortley on limited access. Several people I know have written to their Congressional reps to have the TR Township bill scrutinized very carefully!
I plan on writing to the US Government Accountability Office to ensure that the TR Township FEMA bill is appropriately reviewed!
robert curran
8:51 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012
Has anybody ever heard of a TEMPORARY EASEMENT?
Maybe the borough attorney could explain it
TRWatch
9:03 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012
Fact, water levels are rising faster along the costs of the Mid-Atlantic states then elsewhere on the east coast. The effects are already apparent.
jerseyswamps
2:56 am on Friday, December 28, 2012
Fact? Really? Water seeks to be level. The only way it could be higher in the Mid-Atlantic than the north or south Atlantic is if the moon sat off the Mid-Atlantic coast, permanently. The gravitational pull from the moon would cause a bulge. If that happened then the Mayans got it right.
On our own
10:08 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012
Replenishing the dunes is a major concern that should be dealt with immediately. My husband and I, (permanent Ortley residents) have written numerous letters and emails to the mayor and council to this effect receiving no replies. Another major concern at this point is the letter that the township engineer has written to the FEMA Joint Field Office. He has requested a "re"remapping of certain Toms River areas and has suggested a BFE of 14 feet for the Ortley Beach homes. Although FEMA has recently rated us "AE" an 8' level, an uptick from the current 6' level, he wants to move us to "V". If you were to comply with this figure, most of our homes would violate current height restrictions and if you didn't comply, property homeowners could result in flood insurance premiums of $31,000 per year or a home that could never be sold! It is the time for all Toms River residents to unite together so that rebuilding and replenishing aren't for naught. Continue to call and write the mayor and council members to hear your voice.
Pat S.
1:19 am on Friday, December 28, 2012
kat- then I guess that you're not blaming the "selfish, greedy and self aggrandizing" people you mentioned previously. Does that also include the people who make "imprudent"decisions and those whose " tax dollars buy them the right to continue their madness"? Sounds like fingerpointing to me!
G.C
1:24 am on Friday, December 28, 2012
It's FUNNY that Toms River says it is illegal to use taxpayers money to build the dunes on a private beach but exactly what do you think we are?? Guess what, we're TAXPAYERS too and pay nearly 8k a year for a tiny lot so what exactly are we getting for the taxes we pay?? I don't see them turning down that nice fat check they are getting from us, do you???? In my opinion we are paying outrageous taxes to Toms River, the least they can do is Build our dunes back. If it floods again, blame it on THEM, not the homeowners. If you ask me, every Toms River official should step down from their position for their disgraceful handling of the aftermath of Sandy!!!!
Lori Noel Lewkowitz
7:45 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
You're only paying 8K? Why do I have only have 1,000 square feet and it's nearly 10K? I need to apply for a refund or get some beach replenishment for all of that money I've been spending.
Lori Noel Lewkowitz
7:48 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
Maria Maruca continues to refer to Ocean Avenue in Ortley Beach as Ocean Terrace. She doesn't even know the difference!
Lori Noel Lewkowitz
1:26 am on Friday, December 28, 2012
In 2000 the Army Corps of Engineers restored beaches both public and private throughout Monmouth County. This project was supposed to continue the following year(s) in Ocean County. Also, they were supposed to maintain it every five years. What happened to that original plan?
Ana Prodani
6:42 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
The restoration did not work. Look it up. It didn't work at the outer banks either. One storm and millions of dollars got washed away. Monmouth County regerts taking the Army Corps of Engineers advise and warns other communities against doing the same.
letsgetreal
9:23 am on Saturday, December 29, 2012
If I am not mistaken, each town has to sign off and agree to the Army Corps replenishment all the way down the beaches in OC which apparently was not done and agreed upon by some towns so once again ignorance and stupidity prevented this from happening, hence no replenishment.
butch cassidy
11:23 am on Sunday, December 30, 2012
lori, maria has a big job with the div of motor vehicles now..pizza to that go figure..anyway she is too busy to do both. she really should step down and give the job to someone who actually lives there!!
Lori Noel Lewkowitz
1:34 am on Friday, December 28, 2012
Now that I think about it, the restoration in Monmouth County was done in 1999. The following summer, 2000, Ocean City was done and it was beautiful. Whatever happened to Ocean County's replenishment back then?
Ana Prodani
6:46 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
@Michelle V- They don't understand because they don't live there, if they did they'd have a different opinion. You comment was very well stated.
Lori Noel Lewkowitz
7:30 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
There is nothing for me to look up. I just have to look out my front window. Besides Ortley Beach I also live on Ocean Avenue in Bradley Beach during the summer for the past 23 years and what the ACOE had done back 1999 held up very nicely until Superstorm Sandy hit in 2012. So there. LOL
Alhick4496
6:13 am on Friday, December 28, 2012
I don't understand you people. I own a home with a private beach, you had no problem with the government spending $23 billion protecting new Orleans after katrina and they live 8 feet below sea level. So you ok with tax dollars going to the south but your not ok with them helping tax payers in your own state.
.
6:58 am on Friday, December 28, 2012
I am not opposed to the government helping anyone. So many people have lost so much due to the storm, but you said it yourself, "private beach". You don't want anyone on "your" beach, but now you want everyone to help you?
Michelle V
2:49 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
I very rarely give my input, but after reading all the immature, obnoxious statemts & as a SF HO in Surf Cottages, which has a private beach/assoc I must comment. Our beaches had fairly high dunes prior to Sandy which saved our oceanfrt homes as well as other homes in the comm. We all suffered severe flooding/damage. We pay TR taxes & HOA fees. Our fees pay to maintain our beaches, pay lifeguards, etc. There are NO bathrms or parking spaces avail. However, anyone who wants to use our beach can pay for a day pass like every other beach. After Sandy our dunes were washed away, however our beach was strewn with debris including car parts, pieces of houses, etc. that clearly did not come from us. TR did not want to clean our beach.TR does not want to rebuild our dunes. We all pay taxes to TR & get min. in return. I understand all the arguments about public/private beaches, who should pay what; but at this point the fact of the matter is if TR had built dunes across the entire OB, including the access ramp 20 ft. high prior to the storm we most probably would not be aruging about this. Seaside Pk had min. damage because they built their dunes prior to the storm. Where were the TR decision makers? Just build the dunes where needed regardless of who owns what to prevent further damage & expense to all. They also need to clean out the sewer sys which is prob filled w/sand to stop the continued flooding. TR will not let us secede because they make too much money off us. Let us go!
Lori Noel Lewkowitz
9:17 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
Yes, well said, Michelle V.
Alhick4496
4:08 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
Well said Michelle I couldnt have said it any better.
Jerseybrat
4:14 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
Hey if they won't sign the easement - build the dune around the back and side of their houses - not to ruin the Ocean view - they can climb the dunes to get into their house - if they don't sign the easement it isn't a home it's an investment - this way the area is still protected - the houseowners maintain their view & private beach & we can all stand on the dunes and watch the ocean take their home next time.
Michael Capo
6:16 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
Genius
Karen Cecere Haruthunian
4:19 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
I will try again, who paid to fill the sink holes on both public and private property ? And why are rebuilding of the dunes different .
Ana Prodani
7:21 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
@Karen Cecere Haruthunian-- In answer to your question-- Sink holes on private roads get paid for by the residents of the community. These communities are responsible for maintaining the private roads, beach, dunes,and lifegaurds. These same communities received a letter from TR offering to pay for the replenishing of the dunes. Some communities have already decided against taking them up on the offer. A couple have decided to accept the offer because they already grant punlic access to their beach in exchange for badge fees which are used for beach maintenance and clean up. The majority of private beach owners would like to at least entertain the idea, but asked for a meeting with the town in order to better understand what would be expected of them should they choose to proceed. The town has turned down the request for a meeting. The reason being -- they claim they can't give legal advise. We are not asking for legal advise... we have lawyers for that. Our lawyers can't advise us because the letter from the town is so vague. We simply need our questions answered, such as...Do we need to provide parking? Do we need to provide bathrooms? Do we need to provide handicapped access ramps,etc...
Karen Haruthunian
11:04 am on Saturday, December 29, 2012
Thanks , Ana . I am a beach front owner and agree the document they are asking us to sign is very vague and toms river refuses to give clarity , and toms river council is creating all of the anomosity among everyone . My family also has a home on the bayside and alot of homes had sink soles on their private property that have been filled , not at the owners expense, where did that money come from? Local , state or federal government ? What I do not understand is why we're the sink holes able to filled without an easement signed? But for the dunes we need to sign one .
Michael Capo
4:36 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
I have been saying all along. If Toms River lets us go, lets us secede, then no one from the mainland would have to worry about helping us restore our dunes. The only reason they will not let us secede is that we pay the lions share of taxes. Just Vision Beach and SCHOA pay over $2,000,000 per year in property taxes. Let us go and we can use that money to take care of ourselves. We don't need Toms River administrators (the same township that gave us Michael Ritaco). Im sure the residents of the mainland would be happy to make up that $2,000,000 and not have to complain about OB. We have intelligent, professional managers living here that can do a far better job of managing our lives and our town than Toms River can ever hope to do. So all of you mainlanders that are so concerned about your tax dollars going to us, tell your TR government to let us go. We will keep and use our tax dollars and you can keep and use yours. Then they can continue to spend your tax dollars on deals like Ritaco put together. I dont see much indignation about his mis-use of taxpayer funds. You mainlanders deserve the government you get. Let us go, you dont need (or want us) and we dont need or want to be a part of such a mismanaged , money wasting, inept township. Lets all be happy, live and let live, let us go and we wont ask you for anything. We dont need Toms River. Lavalette is an example of the best , most cost effective, efficient town government.
Lori Noel Lewkowitz
7:36 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
I've just learned that 25% of Toms River's tax revenue comes from the barrier island. Let's succeed from Toms River and watch their tax rates skyrocket.
Bob H
5:36 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
Michelle is correct except for 1 statement. We do not sell badges to anyone that does not own or rent properties in our association. As far as the easement goes that will not be done. That was voted on already and the answer was NO. Why would we want toms river building our dunes. Most our our problems came when the dunes they built in the 1st place. When their dunes gave way from both sides of us is when the ocean hit us from both sides (never straight on). Our condo membership helped our survival as much as OUR dunes did. If it was not for our dunes and those condo associations we would have looked like Ortley beach proper (almost total devastation). To all those private association that have a FUN,Clean well run beach keep it that way. Once you get any form of government involved there is one thing that is for certain, (they will always find a way to screw it up).
Also for all you who think that we are wealthy or were born with a silver spoon in our mouth, i guess never wanted anything better for themselves or their family. News!!
Most of our owners, saved, worked 6 to seven days a week, and had more than 1 job from 9 to 5. WE earned it and there is nothing stopping your from doing the same. So do not make judgments on someone you evidently know nothing about.
As far as the taxes go just from our private association. We contribute about $2,000,000/year to Toms River, so even if they were to fix our dunes they would not be using anyone else's tax dollars to pat for it.
Ana Prodani
7:24 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
@BOB H-- I am in complete agreement with all you just said. Thank you.
Doug Bennett
8:36 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
You are just a bunch of parasites that want your beach rebuilt, your shacks rebuilt and then want to tell every one to screw themselves. Typical north Jersey scum looking for hand outs and trying to get over on the season. As far as your Two million dollar tax bill, that doesn't even cover carting the liquor and beer bottles off the beach and in to land fills paid for by the township. You all think you were born with a silver spoon in your mouth. If would be good if you can't pay your own way to move on since you dopes have made a mess that not only impacted the bay but all the towns around it. Find yourself another bunch of patsys to screw.
letsgetreal
9:32 am on Saturday, December 29, 2012
One thing though, take the time to go to Google earth and hold the cursor over a majority of Ortley beach and interior, bayside and the beach side. Now with that on the bottom of the page you will see the elevations. Ortley is so low that even if you put a 25 foot dune the Ocean is going to breach, and flood the area in another bad storm. The big problem that everyone is missing here is its Engineering and not really mechanical or human, though its nature. The area is just so low that after the storm you could sit at the end of a street and almost be level with the ocean. That is the problem. Now go to Lavalette and you will see at the end of the Ocean Streets they gradually incline from 35 North east to a point where the natural elevation is about 16 feet above the Ocean and then dunes on top giving it a structurally sound barrier. I am afraid that this will never happen in Ortley, you cannot raise the entire beach front. This is why Lavallette suffered only flooding and no major structural damages. Its also true in the Northern end by Silver Beach, OB #1 ect.
On our own
9:05 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
Donna Griffin, you seem to be a voice of reason. This is not a Mainlainder versus Beach problem, nor argument. We all enjoy the beaches for fishing, swimming, entertainment, etc. The fact that I've worked very hard to afford a house by the beach should not condemn me, it is smallminded to think we all have to live on the same street.
Any Ortley Beach resident with common sense wants effective beach management, nor does he have a problem with a 20' dune. I do not have a private beach, but I understand their reluctance not to trust the town. I would think that the town can enact a code that would allow them to keep their beach, on the condition that they create their own dunes equal to the public dunes. As in any code violation that can endanger someone else, fined if you don't comply...
butch cassidy
5:04 pm on Saturday, December 29, 2012
maybe citizens cant own the beach anymore...it belongs to the taxpayers and not just one person...so the majority should win and the easements and dune replenishment should be done sooner than later please
Pat S.
10:37 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
Doug Bennett- since you feel it necessary to judge people you know nothing about, I am going to do the same. It's a shame your jealousy made you such a bitter person.
Karen Cecere Haruthunian
11:50 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
Doug Bennett- I don't know who you and am not god so I can not judge you , maybe you can do us the same curtesy .
Lori Noel Lewkowitz
5:30 am on Saturday, December 29, 2012
Karen: Ignorance is bliss. LOL
Doug Bennett
6:46 pm on Saturday, December 29, 2012
I am not jealous and I am certainly not bitter. I certainly have no interest in building on a sand bar and I have no interest in paying for the morons that do. I think you morons should get off the beach and pay for all the damage your shacks and your garbage have done to the mainland.
Beachbumble
1:03 am on Saturday, December 29, 2012
I'm confused about why people "are sick of paying taxes and having toms River spend money to replenish beaches". I'm from a beach association and Toms River has never spent one cent on our beach. We pay to maintain our beach and dunes. Mantoloking has told their residents that they will not add any more bathrooms and private beaches will remain private. Why won't Toms River make the same promises? Who wants smelly porta potties in front of their houses? Because we will be required to have bathrooms if the beach becomes public by signing the easement. When people buy badges from Toms River they won't hand the money over to our association to pay the lifeguards or maintain our beaches. So they can sit back and collect the $ and not contribute anything towards daily operations.
On another note, the loose piles of sand they piled in Ortley are NOT dunes. They are not reinforced with fencing or grass and will NOT protect anything if a bad storm comes. A total waste of money.
Doug Bennett
6:50 pm on Saturday, December 29, 2012
As soon as you clowns get off the beach and let it go back to being the sandbar that God and Mother Nature intended than you won't have to worry about what Toms River does or does not do. One prognosticator on the weather channel said last night that he does not believe there will a single private home on the sand bar within 40 years. Take the money and run now is my suggestion.
On our own
9:38 am on Saturday, December 29, 2012
Ortley Beach residents need to be aware of an issue concerning the new FEMA map and our township "engineer". FEMA has established a new Base Flood Elevation for affected areas (Silverton, Green Island, Lavalette, Ortley, etc.). This new map is legally not to be based on a one time occurrence, rather an accumulation of historical data. Levels have changed, for instance, Ortley's behind the dune area previous BFE was 6' now it is 8'. OK, assume they have the data to support this. Unbelievably, "our" engineer has written to FEMA (copy of letter available on Twp website) requesting, by "his observations" for that level to be raised to 14' ! He has also requested lower levels for areas that are still flooding, according to above comments.
This has a double edge consequence. To Ortley residents, there isn't a home on Ortley at that level, so either you raise your home or not afford flood insurance. To the rest of Toms River, do you really want to subsidize empty properties. even the "haters" have to be smart enough to know it takes All communities to keep Toms River afloat. I am not begrudging paying my taxes, that's America. I am begrudging being SOLD OUT by a township engineer who feels he knows more than FEMA accumulated data, based on observations.
P
Sam H
12:01 pm on Saturday, December 29, 2012
What the heck is up here. We live off Fisher Blvd not on the water and "mainland". We had 2 feet of water in our home during Sandy. We had to rip all of the sheetrock out and everything else. Last week we had water again in the front of our home and the street was flooded for a few hours. So, now what do we do? We do not live on the water and my home has flooded twice in 8 weeks. Again not barrier island, not mainland nor on the water either. Just near waterfront on Fisher Blvd.
Sam H
12:09 pm on Saturday, December 29, 2012
Let me clarify my comment. We do live on the mainland off Fisher Blvd just not on the water. My point is we do not live on the barrier island nor on the Bay, Lagoon or River. Just a ranch near the water off Fisher and we have had one major flood, a small one and three times I had to wait to get off my street because it was flooded. Oh yea we have been here for 27 years,
Pat S.
12:13 pm on Saturday, December 29, 2012
letsgetreal- you are right, the town did send the agreement for the dune issue. But the problem is, it is vague (our lawyer's word) and if we sign it, we are signing something that is the equivalent to signing a contract that you haven't read. They won't answer any questions we've posed- they keep telling us that they can't give legal advice. We don't want or need their advice; what we want is them to clarify what this agreement entails. We are not a wealthy community; we are just trying to protect what we have. We need people to know that even if we give public access, the town expects our association to continue paying for maintenance, lifeguards, badge checkers, and the added insurance to cover Toms River beachgoers using our beach. So in essence, we are turning over our beach to the public but we are responsible for the expenses to run it. We are being held hostage by Toms River and taking the blame for not freely giving access. Please understand our dilemma.
Doug Bennett
6:53 pm on Saturday, December 29, 2012
If you people spent less on lawyers and more time realizing what the reality is, you would get off that sandbar and leave it as God and Mother Nature intended. You don't own the beach...you just think you do. The first warning shot has been fired. Expect God and Mother Nature to keep the war going until you surrender.
Pat S.
12:28 pm on Saturday, December 29, 2012
ORTLEY RESIDENTS! Please go to the Toms River website for our new re-entry schedule. We are still being prevented from going to OUR property on a daily basis. It is now because of "safety" issues. Why is it that every other area is safe enough to go into, but we are not??? We are being prohibited from protecting our property, from working to remediated the damage, and getting our lives back. We can't allow Toms River to continue abusing us.
Mark
1:48 pm on Saturday, December 29, 2012
Is there a face-book page for the Ortley Beach issues? If not is anyone willing to set one up? I think we need to start organizing rather quickly because we are obviously not getting help or answers from TR.
Mark
1:50 pm on Saturday, December 29, 2012
By the way while taxpayers/homeowners of Ortley Beach languish in limbo-land, our Ward One Council woman Maria Maruca was too busy to attend the last TR Council meeting on 12/26/12 In addition 2 other Councilmen ( Manforti & Wittmann) failed to attend and a 4th Councilman Sevastakis ( dressed for a beach outing!) spent most of the meeting playing with his smart phone (see below link video of meeting)! This is truly a sad, incompetent bunch and it looks like we're on our own! The message is crystal clear the Council could not care less.
Keeping Ortley Beach closed allows the FEMA tab to continue!
http://tomsriver.pegcentral.com/player.php?video=9fc7cb842bc34934dfb1bb508f1b1970
Doug Bennett
6:58 pm on Saturday, December 29, 2012
If you gave one tenth of what you cost this town with all the drunkenness, all the filth, the drugs, the arrests, the police presence then you might have some room to talk. The only time I can stand to go to the beach anymore is in the dead of winter and now you people have made it so I can't do that with all your cracker boxes floating in and destroying the bay and the river.
butch cassidy
4:55 pm on Saturday, December 29, 2012
waiting for the state to make us pay to go over the bridge...a bridge toll...would it help pay for the replenishment of the dunes?
Pat S.
7:12 pm on Saturday, December 29, 2012
Doug Bennett- I guess you have to resort to calling people (you don't know, at that) names, as you don't appear to be able to grasp what is being said. Until you have the facts, and understand what is truth and what is hype, you should refrain from the kindergarten name-calling you have to hide behind! Ignorance is bliss-
Doug Bennett
5:12 pm on Tuesday, January 1, 2013
You are the ignorant one. I know exactly what is being said and I have responded as I feel. You just want to put down anyone who tries to tell you the truth which you are to stupid to comprehend and to ignorant to want to understand. Take you comment and stick them where the sun doesn't shine.
Karen Haruthunian
9:01 pm on Saturday, December 29, 2012
Pat S. - I am an owner and on the board of Oceanside condominiums , I noticed on the toms river website they are willing to take meetings if there is an attorney present, I suggest all of the beachfront people unite with one attorney and make an appointment . I also think "Doug Bennett" is enjoying his provocative remarks , and we should stop giving him the attention he so despartley craves.
Doug Bennett
5:14 pm on Tuesday, January 1, 2013
Yes, spend your money on an attorney. Spend it on a whole law firm. At least you wont be spending it on booze and drugs for a change. And not to far when the state tells you to get off the beach or drown you will do one or the other.
TR Voice of Reason
10:00 pm on Saturday, December 29, 2012
@Mark you are quite the critical one. Commenting on a Councilman's attire? Councilman Sevastakis and his family are also displaced from the storm. He is well aware of the problems this entire town is facing because of the storm. Maybe he was on his phone because listening to complaints for 2 months is "counterproductive," even if your tax dollars do contribute to his $8900. a year council salary
Green Is.
11:48 am on Sunday, December 30, 2012
A Ha Ha Ha. I take it you do not know this man. He could care less , take that to the bank.
Mark
4:41 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012
TR Voice of Reason: $8900 for showing up ( unless deemed "excused") for 12 meeting per year comes to about $750.00 per meeting....not a bad deal in my book. Oh and don't forget the "free" taxpayer funded medical insurance for him and his family...about 15K to 20K per year!
Ben H.
5:02 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012
Mark, you should save your political retoric for next year. Do not forget we just had an election here in Toms River for 2 wards and the D's did not even put a candidate up in ward 3 and put up a recycled has been, that has never won or could win in ward 4. For the record the last two election the council and Mayors have won in a landslide. So it looks like the voters in TR don't really care about thoses issues.
TR Voice of Reason
7:22 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012
Mark - Now you are getting into an area where you should do your homework. Council meetings are biweekly, along with numerous other meetings and duties that are involved in the position. Thank Goodness most people know and appreciate what the job entails. Another homework assignment, check to see if the beach outfitted Councilman has taken medical benefits since taking office 9 years ago. Wait, I will save you the trouble... he hasn't. He also hasn't taken the payout for not taking them. Don't believe me, ask him at the next meeting. If he is reading his township emails on his personal iPad or phone, I'm sure he will stop to answer you. If you are truly displaced from the storm like him, you know that there are not enough hours in the day to meet everyone's needs, so you do your best by multi-tasking. They all care about Ortley, Councilman Carr and Sevastakis were over there the day after the storm and many times since, there are just no easy answers so I understand your frustration but placing blame resolves nothing. This is my last response, have a Happy New Year and may it bring some answers to this devastating situation for all affected.
Nelson R.
5:25 pm on Tuesday, January 1, 2013
Give it a rest, that because he get's his benefits from his spouse who is a public employee in Toms River, so we the tax payer still pay's for it.
Lori Noel Lewkowitz
2:16 am on Monday, December 31, 2012
It is disrespectful to everyone while Councilman Sevastakis was busy clicking away on his cell phone during the 12/26/12 meeting, When I'm at work, either in a law office or court room, I turn my phone off. In some court houses it is required to check your phone at the door and take a ticket just like you would for your coat or jacket.
Glenn Squire Vil.
3:14 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012
Yes, I could see him doing that for sure. Too bad he is not up with the other four ward councilman next year, then we could get rid of five of them.
Lori Noel Lewkowitz
2:26 am on Monday, December 31, 2012
Wow, Karen H., that Doug Bennett person makes quite an argument for the proponents of gun control. LOL
Michael Capo
2:56 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012
We should take the time to thank all of those good Christian people who during our crisis in this Christmas season extended us nothing but wishes for our houses to wash into the ocean.
Doug Bennett
4:55 pm on Wednesday, January 2, 2013
I am still trying to figure out this comment. But since you have already told me that you are so much smarter than I am (at least grammar wise), perhaps you will explain it to me some time. Otherwise, have a great day.
Pat S.
8:32 pm on Tuesday, January 1, 2013
DB- may all the wishes you've sent be returned tenfold to you. Happy New Year.
Doug Bennett
4:51 pm on Wednesday, January 2, 2013
Thank you Pat. I have but one wish, to see Island Beach State Park extend to the Bay Head border. I am looking forward to it and feel it has already started. I am glad you are hopeful as well. Have a great day.
Michelle V
10:30 pm on Tuesday, January 1, 2013
Funny how this obnoxious, nasty, evil little man has the initials DB....perfect for what they really stand for Douche Bag!!! Mr. DB, I hope you never venture your pathetic self over the bridge to our sand bar where we are all drunken slobs that pollute the beaches and landfills....you might run into one of us drug taking cracker jacks!
Doug Bennett
4:26 pm on Wednesday, January 2, 2013
I hope not! I hope you all decide to stay with your cracker boxes in the next storm. Then we won't have to hear the whining of the clowns that want the government to rebuild their property but think the beaches are theirs exclusively. I look forward to the day that Ortley Beach looks like Island Beach State Park. Hang around for the next storm. It is coming and many after that. If I am a douche bag, I wonder who the recipient is? Or is your brain so addled from all the booze and drugs that you don't even know what a douche bag is? Please get help if you ever plan to have any children. I have seen what drugs and booze do to them. I have seen what it has done to kids over at the beach when I, unfortunately, found myself over there during the summer.
Lori Noel Lewkowitz
11:53 pm on Tuesday, January 1, 2013
Pat S. and Michelle V: You folks crack addict me up. LOL. I'd send him a book on English grammar if I thought he was somewhat literate. Don't encourage him as this is, sadly, the most fun he's ever had in his life.
Doug Bennett
4:45 pm on Wednesday, January 2, 2013
This is not any fun at all talking to and trying to reason with a bunch of misguided and arrogant fools. And for someone who wants to talk about grammar on a forum such as this where it is expected or at least anticipated that language or at least usage will be more colloquial, seems like you are grasping at straws, I would have you go back and look at a few of the posts you have left if you want to discuss grammar. If you truly work in a legal capacity (very doubtful), I feel sorry for the clients. That is unless you are the cleaning lady...then I just feel sorry for their health and hygiene. Otherwise, have a great day.
Pat S.
12:49 am on Wednesday, January 2, 2013
You're right, Lori, but it's fun playing around with DB's pathetic little rants. I just want to see how many slurs he can include in his diatribes- parasites, shacks, scum, dopes, morons, clowns, ignorant, stupid. What a master of the English language!
Doug Bennett
4:49 pm on Wednesday, January 2, 2013
I think you hit them all so you must be very familiar with them. Do you have more words in your vocabulary like 'take responsibility' 'private property and its upkeep should be paid for by its owners' or orthers of the same vein. Btw, is douche bag in your vocabulary? Otherwise, have a great day.
Pat S.
5:48 pm on Wednesday, January 2, 2013
Add "fool" to the list.