Woman Charged With Leaving Dog to Die Will Appear in Superior Court
A court date has yet to be set
The Forked River woman charged with animal cruelty after she allegedly left a dog to die in a home will appear in Ocean County Superior Court.
Megan Otte, 21, was arrested in June after police investigating a suspicious odor at a Pensacola Road address discovered the dog, Ruger, dead inside a dog crate in the home.
Otte was arrested on Tuesday, June 26 and charged with animal cruelty and abandonment.
An investigation by Officer Paul Sullivan and Officer Paul Schlossbach of New Jersey Society for the Prevention of Cruelty of Animals found that Otte moved from the Pensacola Road home and left Ruger, a mixed breed, alive in the cage. Sometime after she moved, Ruger died, police said.
The Ocean County Prosecutors Office has decided to keep the case against Otte rather than sending it back to Municipal Court, said Robert Scott, executive assistant prosecutor. Otte will be prosecuted in Superior Court. The case is assigned to Heidi Tannenbaum-Newman.
An indictment is currently pending, said Wayne Lagerquist, Assistant Criminal Division Manager. A court date has yet to be set.
The last court event was Otte’s bail hearing on Friday, July 13. Otte posted $7,500 bail with no 10 percent option through a bondsman on Monday, July 23.
In the meantime, animal activists have taken it upon themselves to ensure that justice is done for Ruger. A Facebook Page and a petition were started. The Facebook page currently has 565 likes while the petition has reached its goal of 3,500 signatures.
In New Jersey, animal cruelty carries a maximum penalty of six months in prison and a $1,000 fine.
Michael Hendrickson
6:36 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Let this poor girl move on with her life she has suffered enough
Mattie
8:23 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
did you know that this 'poor girl' advertised herself as a PET SITTER in local classifieds? Yes, she did; Google the name. Imagine that.
For all we know, that wasn't even her dog!
Justin
2:04 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
are you joking?? "let this poor girl move on" How about the poor dog?? She should be in jail! someone who can do that to an animal is a criminal and sick in the head!
Justin
2:10 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
you know what Michael Hendrickson, I think you should get your head examined for you to make a comment like that. i am seriously disgusted
Kathi Santamaria
4:00 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
You've got to be kidding
Kathi Santamaria
4:02 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
you've got to be kidding,what about the suffering that poor dog went thru.
Eye on Lacey
9:30 am on Thursday, August 9, 2012
Oh please, the only one that suffered is the dog!!
DONNA
11:52 pm on Thursday, September 6, 2012
You need your head examined.
.
6:49 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Can you imagine how the poor dog sufferered? Obviously, you are not an animal lover, but there is no excuse for what she did. If she didn't want the dog, all she had to do was call a rescue group or bring it to a shelter! Why do you have a pet, if you are going to leave it to suffer and die? What she did was intentional and she needs to pay for what she did.
Becki
6:52 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
If you can do that to an innocent animal you can do that to a human!
Linny
8:20 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Becki you are soooooooooooooooo right...just imagine what this horrible person will do to a human .. It sickens me..
SilentMajority
1:26 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
@Linny "...'will do to a human'..." Are you actually saying that you know for a fact that she will somehow cause a human being to pass away? Let's just convict her now then...forget the trial...forget her rights...she's an animal killer - so she must be a murderer. Get your torches and pitchforks, there's a witch in our midst people. Who's got a stake? Who's got some gasoline? Geez people, look at yourselves.
pospatch
6:53 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
First, if this woman is found guilty, the maximum penalty should be imposed, absolutely.
Now, as a news source, the Patch should be objective; yet they've chosen to publish this article with an incendiary headline. You cannot be charged with "leaving dog to die". By choosing its words deliberately, the Patch has made its opinion clear and in doing so is helping to shape public opinion.
In addition, the Patch notes in the sub-headline that a court date has yet to be set. So, what exactly is the news here? Oh, there is none, but this story gets hits and allows the authors to say they've published a story today.
The Patch should be embarrassed. The Patch should be ashamed.
Also, maybe someone should proofread the fifth paragraph.
SilentMajority
10:07 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
This is one of the most down-to-earth comments I've seen yet on this case. She absolutely deserves harsh punishment, but there is, and has been, no objectivity throughout the whole ordeal. Hell, The Patch even provides links to the the Facebook page and petition. Not to mention they created a news item by interviewing a commenter, who btw is doing good work.
This young lady has been already proven guilty by the High Court of Social Media, apparently of child abuse, serial murder and other offenses before she's even had her chance at a fair trial. Nobody knows the circumstance behind her actions. It's fine to advocate for tougher laws on animal cruelty, but leave the rest to the lawyers and courts. She will have to live with this for the rest of her life, and as I've mentioned, has no chance of living a normal life in her hometown because of all this publicity regardless of the legal outcome. It's a mistake, one which I'm sure she regrets. Punishment sure, but once again people are rallying with their torches and pitchforks.
donald hinman
6:59 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Come on already, my tax dollars are wasted here. This girl made a mistake. One she will live with for the rest of her life. Let it go. She suffers with this every day.
Mattie
8:19 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
A "mistake"? No, a mistake is when you FORGET you left your dog in the car on a hot day and took way longer than you intended in the food store. That would be a mistake.
Leaving a dog behind locked IN A CAGE when you MOVE OUT of a house, is not a 'mistake'. It's a completely deliberate act of animal cruelty, resulting in its DEATH.
Eye on Lacey
2:12 pm on Sunday, August 12, 2012
And the dog suffered a horrible death!!
SC
8:40 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
JUSTICE FOR RUGER!! LET HER ROT IN A JAIL CELL FOR THIS!!!
Barbara Bonacolta
8:51 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Ok so she made a mistake, we'll see what she has to say when she's in court but seriously you left a dog locked in a crate and left it there? Something is so wrong with this picture. No we don't have the right to judge let the evidence prove it.
Joe Stewart
9:10 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
A mistake is something you do out of poor judgement that does not put anyone or anything in harms way. How about we just say that a drunk driver that kills someone made a mistake and let him move on with his life because AWW he suffered enough. Or maybe we can lock you in a cage for a few days and say we just screwed up. What makes a human's life that much more important than an animal. Lock this girl up for the max! This was attempted murder and was absolutely done with complete knowledge that the dog would die.
1stcav
9:13 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Agree with Mattie: How could she sleep at night , knowing that dog was caged, no food or water and the heat of the summer , in a closed house, killed that dog !!!! It died a horrible death @ her hands, despicable...
Sue Mc
9:25 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
The laws on animal abuse need to change. They need to be made stronger. The legal system has deemed this case worthy of being held in Superior Court, ather than kicking it back down to the municipal level. Kisha Curtis, the woman on trial for the gross neglect of "Patrick" is also being tried in Superior Court, and Patrick is ALIVE today.
Those who claim she just made a mistake, are closing their eyes to the fact that she left the dog trapped in a crate. That animal did not stand a chance once she left. It couldn't bark at the window, scratch at the door or anything else to get someone's attention for help.
Those who claim it's just an animal, well, I hope you don't have any pets in your household or in your care.
Those who wish harm on Ms. Otte should be ashamed of yourselves. That puts you on her level, and that of her defenders. Wish, instead, for justice.
SilentMajority
10:10 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Last paragraph is on point Sue. But what she did was a mistake, one which I'm sure she would take back if she had the chance. I realize what she did and am in no way closing my eyes to the facts. I just think there may be other circumstances that caused her to do what she did.
SilentMajority
10:25 am on Thursday, August 9, 2012
@Mattie Saw your comment last evening, maybe you deleted it. Just wanted to let you know, no hard feelings. I guess The Patch deleted my comments and a few of kevin's as well. Not sure why, they weren't inappropriate at all. Regardless, thanks.
Mattie
12:44 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
Good, glad you saw it before it got deleted. It's all good.
However, WHY they would delete a comment that was an APOLOGY to someone here is beyond me....
:: shrugs::
kevin sullivan
1:02 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
silent majority i think you,ve seen too many lifetime movies of the week "maybe she had to run away from something and only had a choice between her child and her dog" . youre kidding right? the only "mistake" she would take back was getting caught in the first place. next time she,ll be smarter and drive up the parkway a bit and then throw her next dog or cat out of her car. she had many choices . she could have dropped it at a shelter. at minimum she could have left it in her backyard and maybe neighbors would have at least spotted a starving dog. she is going to superior court where she wont be paying $100 fine which would keep pospatch and silent majority happy. everyday there are horrible animal stories in the paper and its time some actual justice is done instead of yet another animal abuser and killer walks out of a court laughing after a slap on the wrist. particularly sickening is michael hendrickson and donald hinman who have gone out of their way for this creep repeatedly by having petitions signed so she can get off scot free and appearing as trolls on every thread mentioning her. guys if youre that desperate for a date why dont both of you go to her court appearence and see which one of you can ask her out on a date first. you might have to wait a year or so for your first date though.
SilentMajority
1:21 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
@kevin I'm not kidding at all actually. I think you have a narrower view of the world than holyhhh. It's nice that you know exactly what the situation was and what was going on in her mind. Maybe you should let the courts know so you can provide some expert testimony? If folks can start petitions for harsher punishment, others can start them for lesser punishment. They're entitled to their opinions as much as you are. It's a shame you're so quick to dismiss the idea that her circumstances might have been a significant factor in her actions.
kevin sullivan
1:13 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
pospatch while youre proof reading the 5th paragraph for clerical errors here are some of the facts for you who seems to be shocked by the words " leaving a dog to die" . newsflash pospatch when you lock a dog and a crate and leave it for weeks what did you think it was a new tough love diet plan for dogs? . if it werent for her neighbors calling the cops about the smell of a decaying animal and otte had simply buried it instead she wouldnt have made the "mistake" of getting caught. donald hinman i know its impossible for you to understand but there are people who care about animals including their dogs and cats. i know you consider all animals vermin but we cant fix your upbringing. hinman who says "this is a waste of my tax dollars" . donny maybe you can consider someone going to court after smashing your windows in or breaking into your house a waste of tax dollars too.
patchmeup
4:20 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
You know its possible that the dog wasn't even hers and that an angry and unrepentant neighbor could have framed her? Did they check the cage for fingerprints? Did they check the dog for fingerprints? I am sure that all of this will come out at her trial and then she will be vindicated. Remember...Innocent until proven guilty here in the USA. BTW Let's Go USA in the olympics!!!
Penelope
7:05 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
http://lacey.patch.com/users/deidre-14a9cef9/comments
donald hinman
8:02 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Please stop all the hate. I feel so bad for this girl. Everyone makes mistakes. That's it, that vicious dog would of been put to sleep eventually anyway. Not saying the way it died was right but it is just an animal. Not a human.
Penelope
8:53 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
what makes you think the dog was vicious?
Eye on Lacey
9:30 am on Thursday, August 9, 2012
Your thinking is twisted. Leaving an animal to starve and die is NOT a mistake!!
SilentMajority
10:25 am on Thursday, August 9, 2012
This is a comment to the administrators/authors of this article. Why are you deleting comments that aren't inappropriate? There are missing entires from myself and others that were not in any way disparaging or offensive - mostly, just passionate as this is a highly charged emotional story. Allowing folks to comment encourages good debate and discussion. By randomly removing comments at your whim, you're creating a disconnected roster of posts that doesn't make sense to those reading. Clearly, The Patch has a stance on this case. But it's just not fair to delete comments that you don't like. There are other comments that you've chosen not to remove that have a much harsher and more negative tone and don't speak to the issue at hand at all. Please, you write the articles and let the users comment. Don't push your views on those with differing opinions. Thank you.
Amanda Macarthur
12:44 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
Y was my comment deleted.. i had facts in therefore to this case
Nicholas Loffredo
11:59 am on Thursday, August 9, 2012
SilentMajority: We certainly agree that allowing folks to comment is healthy and desirable. We err on the side of allowing all discussion. Unfortunately, we must delete comments that violate our Terms of Use. Those choices aren't made on a whim or because of any editor's "stance" on any issue. We monitor as closely as possible and otherwise hear from readers who flag comments or email about threads they find offensive. http://lacey.patch.com/terms
Mattie
2:55 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
So why was my comment to SilentMajority deleted? I was apologizing for letting myself get caught up in the nastiness around here, and unfairly commenting against SilentMajority personally. There was really no reason to delete that. Although I'm glad he/she saw it before you did.
SilentMajority
2:55 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
Thanks for the semi-clarification Nicholas. After reading the terms, I still am not sure I understand the basis for deleting some of the comments that you did. I can only speak to what I've posted, but what's been removed doesn't violate anything noted in the terms. In addition, I've seen comments threatening, promoting violence, etc...that were not ever deleted. Just because a reader flags a comment, doesn't necessarily mean it's offensive. You actually deleted a comment from another user apologizing...what's the reason for that? To me, that's deleting on a whim and seemingly based on your personal opinion of the context/content of the actual comment. I think you owe some folks here a better explanation than what you've provided.
Amanda Macarthur
12:44 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
How was my comment offensive i stated fact of this case and more facts about this girl... no threats.. no faul language and i am on the side of her goin to jail
SilentMajority
2:55 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
@Amanda, You're totally right. In another Patch articles, I've seen links provided in comments that were not removed at all. I'm thinking that's probably the reason they'll give. But they have no problem providing the link to the facebook page it seems.
Mattie
2:55 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
There's no rhyme nor reason for the way/why things are censored around here.... that's been a peeve of mine since the Patch started.
karen v
2:55 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
Ok we all know not everyone looks at their dogs as their children ....I Do ! And I would never leave my CHILD in a house alone to die..... She didn't make a mistake she committed murder !! I would rather see her sit in a cage (jail) and rot away before a dog, and thats the truth !!!! Poor girl my butt !!!!
Penelope
1:13 am on Friday, August 10, 2012
I was deleted too. I dont understand how they email you that your post is up then they delete it. why not flag it BEFORE they approve and post it.
donald hinman
1:13 am on Friday, August 10, 2012
A mistake that's all it was.
Eye on Lacey
2:12 pm on Sunday, August 12, 2012
Yes Donald, you are right; it was a mistake for her to own an animal as she obviously didn't know how to take care of it. Even in prison they feed you and give you water, ugh!!
Don
10:31 am on Thursday, August 16, 2012
Hinman, Hendrickson, both trolls. Likely the same person. Ignore them.
CMC
11:04 pm on Wednesday, September 5, 2012
Hopefully the court will make the decision to put her away...she knew what she was doing..this was no mistake...I'd take my dogs over most humans any day...for the people who are anti animal...I feel for you...you're missing out on one of the best experiences in this life...no one...whether animal or human... deserves to suffer and die at the hands of another...
Verdi1234
3:40 pm on Friday, September 7, 2012
I am in amazement that anyone could think that there would be any defence to leave a dog to die ! I get the impression they are either very naive or more likely, just trying to be provocative because they have Nothing better to do with their lives. They are Really not worth even replying to.
William J Moss
5:59 pm on Tuesday, April 16, 2013
APRIL 16 2013 MEGAN OTT FOUND DEAD IN HER HOME LAST WEEK. Read Patch article