patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!
Local Voices
Unknown

Did Toms River Township Officials Fail To Protect Barrier Island Homeowners?

The picture was taken the day before the storn. It's apparent that Toms River Public Works workes did not adequetly re-enforce the dunes. Could the damange and destruction have been minimized if the dunes were properly built up before the storm? Look at the cottages in South Seaside Park. Those homes virtually sit on the ground and none (even the ocean from homes) had any damage!

 

I think the Toms River Mayor, Councilwoman for Ward 1 ( Barrier Island), the entire Council & the Public Works Director MUST answer the  folloing questions:

 

The date & time dune re-enforcement work start?

The date & time dune re-enforcement ended?

How many workers were involved in the dune work each day?

How many & types of heavy equiptment that was utilized each day?

How high & wide were the dunes re-enforced?

Were there areas not reenforced? ( Harding? Fielder?)

Was any work done on Saturday & Sunday 10/27 & 10/28

Are there official records and pictures documenting the extent of the dune re-enforcement?

Everyone should be asking our elected officials and Mr Ameruso these questions at the scheduled Township Council meeting on Tuesday 11/27/12 6:00 PM at 33 Washington St ( 2nd Fl)

 

Smith E

5:50 pm on Monday, November 26, 2012

Are you for real? This was the worst storm, flooding ectera NJ has ever , ever had. No human could of done anything the days before you dolt. Get back under your rock.

Reply
Comment_arrow

wookfish

7:32 pm on Monday, November 26, 2012

don't complain, next time buy a house away from the ocean!

Comment_arrow

Ryan

8:32 am on Friday, November 30, 2012

Smith E- why is it then that towns with reinforced dunes made out much better (SSP)?

Comment_arrow

Jess

8:50 pm on Monday, December 3, 2012

I absolutely agree that TR did not adequately maintain the beach or dunes. I think you people are extremely ignorant if you think that bigger dunes and beach replenishment would not have have lessened the extensive damage Ortley suffered. It is a fact. There still would have been damages, but why do you think Ortley got hit the hardest???? I lived there for 7 years a block from the beach and every year the beach got smaller and smaller and the dunes were never replenished, I do believe there is some negligence on the part of TR. All they care about is their tax money from us, but don't do anything else for the community. We are the last ones to get plowed when it snows....etc.

Comment_arrow

Rod tozour

11:20 am on Sunday, December 9, 2012

Guess what? Growing up in ortley since 1949 we used to have 30' +- sand dunes to protect the homes. Been through many hurricanes here and hatteras island as a coastie. If we had sand dunes and no boardwalk and ocean road like we did years ago, ortley would have made out better. A lot of close friends lost their homes and dunes would have made it safer. Now the question is, will the new FEMA regs make it so the locals will not be able to afford to live on the beach? after all, ortley is the cash cow for toms rover. Did you also know that the homeless residents are still required to pay their full taxes right now.. Really sad but I will pray that they will be able to return to the beach that we all love.
J

EducatedCitizen

9:47 pm on Monday, November 26, 2012

exactly...people are always looking for someone else to blame. You live near water. Bad storm involving water hit your home=damaged home. Natural disasters are just that, natural! Was it the army corps of engineers that failed to properly construct the levees in new Orleans...or was it the fact that New Orleans is BELOW SEA LEVEL, and is NEXT TO THE SEA, and Hurricane Katrina was a catastrophic storm. Stop looking for a scape goat people.

Reply

Tom

10:26 pm on Monday, November 26, 2012

It had NOTHING to do with any preparation that was or wasn't done before the storm...It was the dunes in Seaside Park that have been there for years that saved those homes...and the dunes were strengthened by the plant growth and their roots...

Reply

I have spoken

7:07 am on Tuesday, November 27, 2012

Mark put down the crack pipe....This was a hurrican. Matter-of-fact Ortley didn't want the dunes. So get off your soap box.

Reply

1stcav

7:58 am on Tuesday, November 27, 2012

There was NOTHING man could have done to prevent this, Mother Nature ALWAYS claims back what ever we do to keep her out !!!!! This will happen again...trust me on this one ! Build back and build high if you want to be near the water...and that doesn't mean YOU will win , but maybe the damage won't be as bad....I wish all well on their re-building process...And do your homework on other areas that were hit hard and did re-build as they have learned a thing or two.....about new building codes...FEMA may tell you , you can't re-build UNLESS you go higher or there will be no coverage if you DON"T follow there strict requirements/requests to do so...

Reply
Comment_arrow

Johnjcpa

8:45 am on Wednesday, November 28, 2012

Toms River follows the FEMA codes and some may be able to qualify for a grant (not loan) for upgrading as they rebuild.

Kristin Rothenberger

8:37 am on Tuesday, November 27, 2012

I agree that the Ortley dunes were not even close to adequate. I have a picture at 4:00 on Sunday at the Trenton Avenue gazebo, 24 hours before the storm hit, and the secondary dune was gone. Other important questions to ask are how did the Ortley dune reinforcement compare with Lavallette and other towns. Just because this was a big storm doesn't mean that town officials acted appropriately. The town has a responsibility to take every necessary precaution to protect our homes.

Reply
Comment_arrow

wookfish

11:15 am on Tuesday, November 27, 2012

no it doesn't, you have the responsibilty to take the necessary precautions! You want to live in a forrest you have to protect your home from fires, near known fault lines >ie> calif..,near rivers from floods...it's your choice where you live thus YOUR responsibility

Comment_arrow

taxed-out-the-wazoo

8:14 pm on Tuesday, November 27, 2012

Hey wookfish...not sure you understand that when time is being billed to the taxpayer for just this very project...it MUST be done properly. It's called fraud. There will be investigations on many levels for the handling of this matter or lack thereof. It IS the obligation of the officials to take the precautions necessary to protect its taxpayers/community. It's called public policy. If it was not for instance if resources, etc. which were earmarked for a certain project were diverted to other items/areas and then this happens as a result of the diversion, there will be some investigations for sure.

bayboat

9:15 am on Tuesday, November 27, 2012

To answer your question Mark...no.

Reply

Bruce

5:30 pm on Tuesday, November 27, 2012

Mark, first of all the dunes in Seaside Park were much bigger and had plenty of vegetation on them and they held up to the storm. Towns did attempt to make temp dunes but they had no chance of surviving this storm and were less then a speed bump for it.

You can not build a dune in a day or week, just because you pile some sand in front of the homes doesn't mean it becomes a wall. It will just wash away when it gets hits by wave after wave. A dune takes years to build.

I applaud the towns effort to at least try but in the end was futile.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Hurricane Sandy

6:14 pm on Tuesday, November 27, 2012

Bruce, I agree with your first two paragraphs whole heartedly.
But why applaud them? They knew it was futile too, as you mentioned. It was like playing with your Tonka trucks down by the water during low tided! Why waste the time. I guess just to say that they did something!

Hurricane Sandy

7:41 pm on Tuesday, November 27, 2012

Hey wookfish.
Pretty poor analogies! How about add, why live by a road for a car to crash into your house, under the flight paths where planes flow over head. I guess we shouldn't live in NJ. We had an earthquake in 2011, does that put us on a fault line? FACT; Yes, this was a storm of mega strength. FACT; Toms River consistently failed to reenforce the dunes. FACT; If Toms River had reinforced the dunes over years, and not just replenished them. The destruction would have been 1/2 of what it was.

Reply

~Barb~

8:01 am on Wednesday, November 28, 2012

When does this nanny state foolishness end?

Reply
Comment_arrow

wookfish

8:22 am on Wednesday, November 28, 2012

When they get their government cheese for their whine

Comment_arrow

charlotte

8:04 pm on Sunday, December 2, 2012

Perhaps in this case - when the billions in tax dollars paid by the citizens is used to provide those same citizens with services AND provide dune building/ reinforcement. Dunes with sand and vegetation build and provide protection. The people in charge of that budget dropped the ball - failed project - was that a budget item?

Any analysis of how much money paid by the Toms River citizens on the barrier island has been returned in services over the past 10-25 years? We don't need your nanny state foolishness - just succession from big brother Toms River.

Comment_arrow

BN

10:52 pm on Sunday, December 2, 2012

Quit whining! You can have a dune after I get a moat.

Johnjcpa

8:37 am on Wednesday, November 28, 2012

If you want dunes in Ortley sufficient for a storm of this size, the Army Corps of Engineers has a standard, it would need to be 22 - 23 ft high and 150 feet wide. You could probably build it if you condemn and remove the first beach block of homes. Might not be enough if the next storm is a category 2 or 3 hurricane.

Reply
Comment_arrow

letsgetreal

5:44 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012

Great point John the Army Corps could not build such large dunes nor could TR Twp because the space and volume needed would then cut the beach significantly thus rendering the beach useless. Bottom line is until all the towns agree to allow beach replenishment for entire barrier island this will continue to happen. However Manasquan had their beaches (along with others) replenished years ago and they still had bad storm damage. Is it me or did we not just get the Storm of the century...?? Why do we feel the need to blame people? Sounds like we should be happy this was not a Cat 1 or 2 storm then the barrier island would be GONE sadly.

Comment_arrow

charlotte

8:24 pm on Sunday, December 2, 2012

So the usefulness of the beach is more important than the protection and safety of the community? Just so the mainlanders don't feel left out - it was the ocean breaches that caused the record flooding later that night in the back bays.

Comment_arrow

charlotte

6:28 pm on Wednesday, December 12, 2012

Build it. If you can keep the Ocean from breaching the dunes - you would not have had the catastrophic flooding in the back bays.

tuna stick

11:20 am on Wednesday, November 28, 2012

Good point John. Fact is we were lucky Sandy was not a Cat 2 or 3 hurricane. If it was, even the 22 ft. high, and 150 ft. wide dune wouldn't have stopped that. Seems as though the questions posted here are asking who is repsonsible for protecting the homes, or who is to blame for their destruction. And while it may be ltigated in the courts for some time, the answer would be the homeowner. The constitution allows for the government to protect us from being attacked, or protecting national security, but not from natural disasters.

Reply
Comment_arrow

letsgetreal

5:47 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012

Another great point...litigation is only going to bankrupt the Town and then more people are going to complain about Taxes....as they will be needed to fight the legal issues that really are due to Mother Nature. I will say I feel for all those who lost, its tragic...no matter whether its their primary or summer home.

Bill Cooper

5:06 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012

No size dune would have stopped this storm according to a national guardsman I spoke with this past Sunday. He stated that the waves were 50 ft. in height. That is why there is so much destruction along Ocean Terrace in Ortley Beach.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Rommel102

11:31 am on Thursday, November 29, 2012

This is a ridiculous comment and patently false. The dunes in north beaches of TR and Lavallette and most of Seaside held up just fine. Waves breaking on the shore were 10 to 15 feet not 50, those are ocean buoy readings.

Donna Griffin

6:24 am on Thursday, November 29, 2012

I've been on the barrier island and the stark difference between the damage in Ortley vs. Lavallette is quite evident. Unless there is a commitment to construct a stable, MASSIVE dune system, rebuilding those homes is going to be a futile effort. With the little swath of beach remaining in some of these towns, swim areas may need to be severely consolidated. I am just hopeful that the locals are on board with the preservation plan. There will likely be another storm in our future which will hopefully leave us with a broader beach area by dumping some sand rather than degrading it. Until that time, all property protection measures must be on the table.

Reply

Bill Cooper

1:35 pm on Thursday, November 29, 2012

Rommel102, your comment is ridiculous. I own a home on 35N and 8th. ave. and was allowed to survey the damage ocean front in Ortley this past Sunday, if your going to tell me 10 ft. waves wiped out dozens and dozens of those homes west of Ocean Terrace then you have not seen the destruction I witnessed first hand and up close. Maybe the national gaurdsman was exagerating but 10 ft. waves could never create the kind of damage I witnessed first hand.

Reply

Jim O'Connor

2:44 pm on Thursday, November 29, 2012

Rather than play the blame game,why not channel those energies into preparing for the next storm and ensuring that all that is possible is done to minimize damage. I own a property there and plan on staying.I could care less if ward person Maruca comes around unless she has a degree in engineering. I have asked this question numerous times and have not gotten an answer. When was the last time the barrier island had a beach replenishment and if not why ? I have to applaud the recovery efforts of all those working to restore the island,MUA workers,private contractors,police,public works personnel and of course all the great volunteers and Red Cross personnel.We can't control what happened,we can do our best to prepare for something like this in the future.Negativity and sarcasm will only destroy not rebuild.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bill Cooper

3:56 pm on Thursday, November 29, 2012

I agree Jim, I've been allowed in twice in the last month and removed all possesions and contaminated items from my home. Lets work to make Ortley and all the surrounding towns better than before. I also agree all those who are working on part of the towns that were effected need to be commended for their tireless efforts. Going back in this Sat. to continue the hard work I'm sure all us have ahead of us. Lets get it done in an orderly and safe manner. Good luck to all those who have been affected by this terrible storm.

Comment_arrow

charlotte

8:18 pm on Sunday, December 2, 2012

Great comments gentlemen - leaders in your community.

Kristin Rothenberger

8:25 am on Friday, November 30, 2012

This is not a blame game. the reason you have to ask these questions is to make the officials understand that we are paying attention to what they do and that they have to set procedures in place to be better protected next time. I realize you can't have 100% protection but we should make sure we do everything that we can. Use my tax money to build better dunes!

Reply

hergirler

11:17 pm on Friday, November 30, 2012

The corpse is apparently well http://www.coachoutletonlinegg.com preserved: a young woman, lying face down, http://www.coachoutletonlineaol.net shielding her face with her hands at the moment http://www.coachfactoryoutletwy.com of death. Her dress has risen up http://www.coachoutletstorefc.com and is tangled around her waist, her bare http://www.coachoutletaol.org legs exposed beneath.She is currently on display at http://www.coachfactoryoutetmp.com the J Paul Getty Museum in Malibu, as the first http://www.coachoutletns.com exhibit in a show that explores the ways that http://www.coachoutletstoreonlineys.net modern artists - from Francesco Piranesi http://www.coachfactoryonlineest.net to Anthony Gormley - have responded http://www.coachfactoryoutletpst.com to history's most famous volcanic eruption. "Welcome to http://www.coachoutletonlinetc.com Pompeii," she is meant to say. "The city of the dead".

Reply

Mari

10:42 am on Saturday, December 1, 2012

That PATCH has some nerve even asking that question!

Reply
Comment_arrow

charlotte

8:12 pm on Sunday, December 2, 2012

Has a "nerve" asking the question? Why? Are opinions and debate also to be subjugated under our current martial law situation?

tuna stick

12:43 pm on Saturday, December 1, 2012

Mari, the Patch wasn't asking this question. This is an opinion from a reader of the Patch, and posted in the "local voices". As anyone can do.

Reply

John Pepe

6:52 am on Sunday, December 2, 2012

I am a civil engineer living in Ortley Beach for 26 years. Ortley Beach was a mud hole before the storm and a huge mud hole after the storm. The entire infrastructure, beach,dunes,storm sewers,roads and streets have been neglected. We had no beach and dunes, it flowed with the ebb and tides. Our taxes are twice as high as Lavallette. Why? This needs to be investigated at a very high level. Our community will never be the same. John

Reply

charlotte

8:14 pm on Sunday, December 2, 2012

Perhaps some (most) of the sink holes are the collapsed septic systems - some people didn't know they had???

Reply

BN

10:56 pm on Sunday, December 2, 2012

Ortley Beach used to be Cranberry Inlet. No use building dunes. If Mother Nature wants it back, she'll take it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mark

3:32 pm on Sunday, December 9, 2012

Actually my understanding is that the Cranberry Inlet used to be by what is now the northern part of Seaside Hts.

Hurricane Sandy

6:04 am on Monday, December 3, 2012

Pepe. Isn't that great. Our taxes are almost twice as high.
And our homes are less expensive.

Reply
Comment_arrow

BN

9:10 am on Monday, December 3, 2012

Your LAND is more expensive. Our HOMES are more expensive. See how it works?

Comment_arrow

John

8:35 pm on Wednesday, December 5, 2012

My home/property in Ortley was valued at $450,000 with taxes of $9200. A home/property in Lavallette with the same value taxes are $4700. Welcome to lets screw Toms River barrier island residence. They don't have enough full time registered voters over there, to do anything to us blood sucking incompetent politicians.

Joan B

6:38 pm on Wednesday, December 5, 2012

Does Ortley have bulkheads up there? Even though I live in Lavallette, I don't know if you had them. I also don't know if the jetty's had any effect. I suspect bulkheads are better than dunes....don't cremate me for my questions!

Reply

wookfish

8:45 am on Thursday, December 6, 2012

John,maybe you should have looked at the tax rates before you bought there..noones fault but your own

Reply

John

10:06 am on Thursday, December 6, 2012

Hey fish, Get a life. Owned for over 40 years. Taxes went from $4200 to $11,000 in one year, four years ago along with all the other TR barrier island residents that got screws. Appealed and they blessed me with $9200. What was the name of that arena in TR that is now called Poland Spring? Oh yea, Ritacco Center. Hopefully a few more of his friends from town will be joining him. And let me guess, you live on the mainland in TR?

Reply
Comment_arrow

careless fills

12:38 pm on Sunday, December 9, 2012

my understanding is that mr. ritacco lived in seaside heights on 11th st

wookfish

11:54 am on Thursday, December 6, 2012

John i've got a great life thank-you..had a house in Silverton on the water..saw the writing on the wall and bailed in 2005 BEFORE i got the TR tax enema, i made a choice.. you could have too

Reply

spot

12:10 pm on Friday, December 7, 2012

when your taxes on a property were $4200, i ask, what was the market value of your property 4 yrs ago? non barrier island residents whose properties were valued quite below the barrier islands had taxes of $6400. the town finally had the nerve to equally proportion the taxes based upon market value. ex. home in silverton on the bay, assessed at 200K for yrs, w taxes of $4200, yet market value was $800K+. home assessed at 400K for yrs- non water front, taxes of $6400m, yet market value was $380K. see the error the town FINALLY CORRECTED? you cant have low taxes and reap the rewards of inflated market value while non barrier island residends dont. if you were a full time resident, you would know this to be true. if you don't like what is going on, no one forced you to purchase property here and not make it your full time residence.

Reply

wookfish

3:13 pm on Friday, December 7, 2012

i understand that spot, that's why i bailed..and got 799,000 $ for my house..BEFORE what i knew would happen with the taxes...again I CHOSE to sell and take the money and run, not bitch because they raised my taxes

Reply

Mark

3:42 pm on Sunday, December 9, 2012

Does anyone have any pictures of the Ortley Beach ocean front area prior to the Ocean Terrace roadway ? Were there homes on what became Ocean Terrace? If so were the homes seized under eminent domain?

There are some rumors going around that Ocean Terrace will not be rebuilt and the new dues will extent onto what was Ocean Terrace. This has to obviously be a federal ( Army Corps of Engineers) project since I have ZERO confidence in our local government!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Rod tozour

7:37 pm on Sunday, December 9, 2012

Careless fills. The crook ritacco lived on 11th ave in seaside park.

Rod tozour

7:43 pm on Sunday, December 9, 2012

Mark, I have pictures of ortley with sand dunes. There were small houses on the beach to the left of the surf club of which a unique gentleman mike howes built and owned. he also built the golden gull which made it through the super storm. There were dead end roads and just one street light on fort ave. you can ask locals like Bucky and Harry, paddle foot, Phil or cliff, Roy or bill who both lost there house.

Rod

Reply

Mark

1:01 pm on Wednesday, December 12, 2012

Rod, I would really love to see those pictures. Is there anyway you could post them on this blog or possibly e-mailing me copies? i would really appreciate it. Thanks

Reply

Leave a comment

The Toms River Patch
Valentine's Shopping Guide

See the full guide!

Patch Picks