Politics & Government

Council Urges Gov. Christie to Veto Changes to Shore Protection Fund

Toms River's Township Council sent a letter to Gov. Chris Christie this week

A bill sitting on the desk of Gov. Chris Christie has left some wondering if the door may soon be opened to New Jersey’s fragile Shore Protection Fund being used to fund projects in other parts of the state.

The bill, S-2620, which has passed both the state Senate and General Assembly, would allow money from the fund – which receives a $25 million appropriation each year – to be used for the repair of walkways and public access paths along the Hudson River in Hudson and Bergen counties.

Toms River Township Council members are joining other local legislators and groups in calling for Christie to veto the legislation. Below is a letter dated July 26 authored by council President George Wittmann:

Dear Gov. Christie:

On behalf of the Township Council of the Township of Toms River, I respectfully but strongly urge you to veto A3874/S2620, which revises the criteria for shore protection funding. If enacted, these amendments will qualify for financing out of the Shore Protection Fund projects geographically and categorically far removed from the Fund’s stated purpose: to support initiatives “associated with the protection, stabilization, restoration or maintenance” of New Jersey’s shoreline along the Atlantic Ocean. The effect will be to divert northward and inland funds meant to protect New Jersey’s most ecologically and economically vital resource, the Jersey Shore.

This is both ill-advised and unacceptable. In the aftermath of Superstorm Sandy, Toms River and New Jersey’s other coastal communities are working tirelessly to rebuild and fortify the shore against future devastation. The Shore Protection Fund is an important lifeline in those efforts. Siphoning off these limited but vital revenues to serve other interests, unrelated to shore protection, exacerbates the financial strain of the post-Sandy reconstruction and disserves the very communities the Fund was established to protect. The Shore Protection Fund is needed perhaps more now than at any time since its inception over two decades ago. It should not be tampered with.

While we do not discount Superstorm Sandy’s impact in other areas of the state, those needs should be addressed in some other way. The Shore Protection Fund was created for the Jersey Shore, and that is where the funds should stay.

Find out what's happening in Toms Riverwith free, real-time updates from Patch.

Thank you for your continued support.

Respectfully yours,

Find out what's happening in Toms Riverwith free, real-time updates from Patch.

George Wittmann
Council President
Township of Toms River


Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.

We’ve removed the ability to reply as we work to make improvements. Learn more here