News Alert
Toms River Protesters Seek 'Justice For Mocha,'…

State Budget Allocates Funding for Joint Base, Picatinny Lobbying Effort

Former U.S. Rep. Jim Saxton had said lobbying effort was central to saving N.J. bases in the past

Patch File Photo
Patch File Photo
New Jersey's 2015 state budget, signed this week by Gov. Chris Christie, includes $200,000 for efforts to protect two state military installations from closure by the federal government.

The funding had been requested by stakeholder groups hoping the state would act to prevent the closure of Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst and Picatinny Arsenal in potential future defense budget cuts or base realignments. During the 1990s and in 2005, when the federal Base Realignment and Closure commissions were targeting military installations for closure – including, at one time, the former Lakehurst Naval Air Station – similar levels of state funding had been allocated to spur lobbying efforts. But in recent years, the funding has ground almost to a halt.

"Thousands of military and civilian jobs depend on this joint operation and we cannot afford the same economic loss as when Ft. Monmouth closed in 2011," said state Assemblyman Dave Wolfe (R-Ocean), lauding the move.

The Joint Base, located in both Ocean and Burlington counties, employs 40,000 people, about evenly split between civilians and military personnel, and accounts for nearly 65,000 indirect jobs through contractors and other businesses in the two-county area.

Picatinny, in Morris County, employs about 4,800 civilians and, like the Joint Base, supports a slew of indirect jobs through contractors that work on projects being developed at the site.

Former U.S. Rep. Jim Saxton told the Ocean County freeholders last month that in the past, the state looked to the Rhoads Group, a lobbying firm led by Barry D. Rhoads, a West Point graduate who specializes in saving military facilities, to lobby on its behalf. Rhoads, Saxton said, is one of the people most responsible for saving Lakehurst and the other former individual installations in the 1990s and 2005.

At the height of the 1990s and 2005 rounds of BRAC proceedings, Rhoads' firm was paid $280,000 for lobbying services, but between 2005 and 2010, investments in lobbying decreased sharply. By 2010, the state was spending about $40,000 on lobbying in favor of protecting the state's military assets.

"New Jersey’s military bases are vital to the security of our country," said Assembly Republican Leader Jon Bramnick, whose district includes a portion of Morris County. "They provide a wide range of technology and combat equipment necessary for supporting our military personnel around the world. They employ thousands of civilians and their importance to our economy cannot be underestimated."

The budget does not dictate how, exactly, the funding will be appropriated; a state agency focusing on military issues will eventually decide.
Marc Micciulla July 02, 2014 at 11:52 AM
I'm all about the military and love having the bases around, but how are we going to give funding to a federal entity when, as Chris Christie stated, the state is broke and can't even take care of the state's responsibilities? Are we broke or are we not broke when you want us to appear that way?
MissElanyS July 03, 2014 at 10:13 AM
This is a sad state of affairs when a United States Military base goes into "foreclosure". This is one of the biggest lies going on in America. Since when is the United States government "broke"? Nothing is done without a purpose and in this day and age, it's usually a nefarious purpose. As far as the State of New Jersey is concerned, same thing applies. We are "broke" like I am the Queen of England and if you believe the lies the government from the top of the pyramid, down dishes out, I have a bridge to sell you. One whose lanes have not yet been closed by Chris Christies filthy hands.
Marynary July 03, 2014 at 11:49 AM
Seems we constantly hear about how Social Security is going to run out of money. How come we never hear about welfare or food stamps running out of money? What's interesting is the first group "worked for" their money, but the second didn't. I mention this to show just how selective saving money tactics are.
MissElanyS July 05, 2014 at 10:10 AM
Or how about how the United States is in multi-trillion dollar debt yet we still send money by the boatload overseas to other countries and fund other country's wars ad nauseum?


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »