Tuition-Free Agreement Raises Questions for School Board

Nine Seaside Park students attending Toms River Regional, and Central Regional says district is losing aid as a result

Why are nine Seaside Park students attending Toms River Regional schools for free, instead of going to schools in their Central Regional sending district?

That's what Central Regional school district and Berkeley Township municipal officials would like to know.

 "We're still trying to figure that out," said Francis J. Campbell, special counsel for the Berkeley Township Council.

The arrangement for the nine students was apparently made during Michael J. Ritacco’s years as superintendent. Ritacco, a Seaside Park resident, resigned in October 2010, the same day the FBI charged him with bribery and tax evasion.

"There was some type of agreement worked out with Ritacco, Seaside Park and the parents," Campbell said. "We are trying to find contracts."

The sending district would normally pay tuition to the receiving district, which is zero dollars to Toms River in this case. The issue would be lost tuition dollars for Toms River Regional, while on top of assuming the cost of educating the students. Toms River Regional announced its per-pupil cost to educate its enrollment is $10,375 per student, according to 2009 figures, the most recent available.

Berkely Township Council members passed a resolution at their Feb. 22 meeting asking the New Jersey Commissioner of Education to approve a "special circumstances" request made by Central Regional Business Administrator Kevin O'Shea that the nine Seaside Park students currently attending Toms River schools be included in the Oct. 15, 2010, Application for State School Aid (ASSA) count for Central Regional.

Not including the nine students in Central's ASSA count would increase Central Regional's tax levy on the taxpayers of the four other sending towns by $421,00 beginning on July 1, Berkeley Township Council President Karen Davis said.

 "Berkeley's portion of the $421,000 in lost aid would result in a $340,000 tax increase, which is totally unacceptable," council Vice President Carmen F. Amato, Jr. said.

"Right now this is a siphon scheme to pull students from Central Regional to Toms River...through a back-door method," Campbell said. "They can't do this. I can't believe that taxpayers in the Toms River school district aren't making this an issue."

But some of them are. A number of Toms River residents have hammered members of the Toms River Regional Board of Education at the January and February board meetings, but have gotten few answers.

Toms River resident Carol Benson urged board members to look into the matter further, and said a tuition-free sending agreement is unfair.

“I don’t have a problem with them because they are from Seaside Park," Benson said. "I do have a problem with the F-word: Free. You need to look at the fairness of such an arrangement to taxpayers. There’s another F-word: Fair.”

Toms River school board attorney Thomas E. Monahan said at the February meeting that a state statute permits school boards to admit students from outside the district, and to decide the rate of tuition, including not charging their sending district at all.

“There’s one statute that allows the Board of Education to take students in with or without tuition," Monahan said. "And it’s up to the board to decide whether it wants to do so."


Seaside Park has been a sending district of the Central Regional school district since Central Regional was formed back in 1954, Campbell said. Prior to that, Seaside Park students went to Toms River schools. But the Toms River district grew so quickly, there was no longer any room for Seaside Park students. So they ended up going to Central Regional.

Until 1976, Seaside Park paid Central Regional through the "turnstile" method.

"Whatever number of kids you sent, you paid a per capita amount," Campbell said.

But things changed in 1976, after the state Legislature changed the tuition payment method for regional school districts from head counts to a formula based on an individual town's property values. The tuition payment change was gradually phased in over a five-period, Campbell said.

"Seaside Park didn't like it one bit," he said.

Seaside Park later filed suit against Central Regional in 2007, claiming that the tuition method was unconstitutional. But a judge later ruled against Seaside Park and dismissed the case. Thirteen individual Seaside Park residents appealed the ruling in October 2010. The matter is still pending, Campbell said.

"Kids who live within the Central Regional school district, in every town, they are residents of the Central Regional school district," he said. "They are entitled to a free public education in one sending district and only one sending district."

Two students from Seaside Park are enrolled at the high school and seven are enrolled at the middle school levels.

Toms River Regional Superintendent Frank Roselli said at a recent board meeting that the matter was an ongoing discussion with Central Regional school officials.

Toms River resident Dennis Galante has questioned the school board a number of times about the issue and has said the district needs to reconsider its sending agreement.

“We’ve been asking for two years, is this in the best interest of the district, for the Board of Education, for the superintendent, to decide to do this?” Galante said.

Joe Joe March 01, 2011 at 05:25 PM
There is a school choice program that is going into effect 2011/12 school year. I don't know all the details, but my understanding is the state aid will follow the student. http://www.state.nj.us/education/choice/ I don't understand $421,000 loss of state aid Central Regional is claiming... Anyway, the bigger issue is the number of school districts and the fact that they should merge. Seaside Heights, Seaside Park, Island Beach. Central and Berkley should merge... redundant admin jobs will be eliminated... cost savings for all instead... needless litigation to determine who's MANHOOD is larger. As for costs... these 9 SSP students don't add any cost to TRRS as additional teachers are not necessary... they only additional cost is the transportation for which they should be charged... But under the School Choice Program, that cost/reponsibility lies with the sending district.. in this case SSP. Bottom line... waste of time talking about it.. just merge the districts for everyone's benefit and realize big cost savings.
Joe Joe March 01, 2011 at 05:26 PM
SSH, SSP, and Island Beach should merge under TRRS... sorry for mistake.
Catherine Galioto March 01, 2011 at 06:18 PM
The sending district would normally pay tuition to the receiving district, which is zero dollars to Toms River in this case. The issue would be lost tuition dollars for Toms River Regional, while on top of assuming the cost of educating the students. Toms River Regional announced its per-pupil cost to educate its enrollment is $10,375 per student, according to 2009 figures, the most recent available. I'll add this to the story.
Joe Joe March 01, 2011 at 07:53 PM
Catherine, I don't know the specifics... but your story needs to talk about the School Choice program which is implemented state wide... and the proposed Voucher program... right around the corner.. My point being... this may be a non-issue next year.
Joe Joe March 01, 2011 at 07:56 PM
Catherine, My understanding of school choice is the state-aid portion per kid goes to the recieving district... there is no tuition paid by sending district. I believe that is what Berkely is trying to say.. they had a loss in state aid for 9 less students. However, Toms River didn't get that state aid as they are not signed up for the Choice program...


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »