.
Feedback

School Aid Figures 'Not What We Were Hoping For,' Administrator Says

Toms River schools will receive an additional $433,000 in aid for 2013-14

Toms River school administrators had hoped for more state aid to help combat a looming ratable base decrease following Superstorm Sandy. The $433,802 aid increase for 2013-14 announced Thursday came as a disappointment.

"It certainly was not what we were hoping for," said Business Administrator William Doering during a public budget meeting Thursday, the second of two this week. The district will receive a total of $67,712,061 in aid, a 0.6 percent increase over the current amount, according to the state.

"It's not helping matters," he said.

The state Department of Education boasted that the 2013-14 aid package is the largest ever released by the state. Nearly $9 billion will go to public schools, an increase of about $97.3 million from the 2012-13 school year.

While state aid remains flat for four districts in Ocean County, many will see an increase in aid this year, including Barnegat, Berkeley Township and Toms River. The districts throughout Ocean County received an overall $2,511,392 increase over the current year. The districts receiving an increase will average a gain of $75 per pupil.

"Throughout my time in office I have continuously argued that in order to grow New Jersey's economy we must invest in education, and my proposed budget is a reflection of my commitment to our educational system and communities across the state," said Gov. Chris Christie in a statement. "However, even as we continue to fund education at the highest levels in state history, we must remain willing to reflect on how we are spending our money and work towards solutions that make every dollar we invest count."

In the $208 million 2013-14 Toms River schools budget, $141,838,236 is to be raised by local property taxes, an increase of 1.9 percent over the 2012-13 spending plan. The ratables breakdown among Toms River, Beachwood, Pine Beach and South Toms River is not expected until mid-April. 

Toms River administrators have said that, because the district is $34 million below its adequacy level -- the amount of money the projected to run a school system of its size -- they should be considered for more state aid. But that money isn't coming.

"I'm trying to see the glass half full here," Doering said.

Administrators were hopeful for more aid money, and on Wednesday during a budget meeting said that the district should not have to consider taking any 2 percent cap waivers.

But Doering on Thursday recommended that a $230,000 cap waiver should be used, as the district will put $1.5 million of its fund balance surplus toward revenue. Taking the waiver will allow the surplus to remain slightly above $2 million, a figure with which administrators are more comfortable.

Board members Ginny Rhine and Loreen Torrone expressed concerns with the waiver, given that residents no longer votes on school budgets. But, others on the board, including President Ben Giovine, agreed with Doering's recommendation not to take too much from the surplus.

The district is expecting $4.3 million in restitution from the Michael Ritacco case; if not all of that can be paid, insurance is expected to cover $2 million, according to officials. Though unclear when it will be paid, having that money incoming made the decision to use some surplus funds easier to handle, according to Doering.

The board will present the budget during a March 5 meeting at High School North before submitting it to the county superintendent by March 7. The final public hearing and board vote on adoption is set for March 21, again at High School North.

On Wednesday, education officials met to discuss the budget's expenditures. Doering said then that next year's spending plan is a "maintenance budget," in that it keeps staffing and program levels stable.

Board members said that they will likely hold more budget meetings throughout the year in preparation of the next cycle and may consider investigating various proposals, such as privatizing transportation, to reduce costs. Members of the public would be invited to any such meetings, according to the board.

 

 

ttt 2012-13 2013-14 Total Aid $67,278,259 $67,712,061 Equalized Aid $40,027,322 $39,889,745 Transportation Aid $4,563,261 $4,586,531 Special Education Categorical Aid $9,037,318 $9,141,043 Security Aid $1,785,892 $1,820,980 Under Adequacy Aid $0 $433,801 Adjustment Aid $11,864,466 $11,839,961 One Year Change $1,173,555 (1.8 percent) $433,802 (0.6 percent)

To see the breakdown of state aid by district, click here.

notasellout March 1, 2013 at 11:38 am
"It certainly was not what we were hoping for," said Business Administrator William Doering during a public budget meeting Thursday, the second of two this week. The district will receive a total of $67,712,061 in aid, a 0.6 percent increase over the current amount, according to the state.
Because $68 million in "aid" couldn't possibly be expected to do the trick. Always with their hand extended out for more. But no matter what, it's never enough for this group to live on. I think it's time to re think how business is conducted at the Ivory Tower on Hooper Ave.
suz March 1, 2013 at 12:42 pm
Property taxes will never be decreased until the school budget is....sad.
JD March 1, 2013 at 02:06 pm
Bottom line... they need to cut costs. Probably need to trim about $5million from the 208million budget and make it $203million.
Lots of places to make cuts... none of them being teacher positions. - Outsource the cafeterias. Currently lose over 2million/yr. - Shutdown down 1144cafe... loses over 250k. - Shutdown 1144 preschool.... loses money. - Cut 1million from sports and extracurricular or pay to participate or both. - Cut 20% of admin positions at schools and central office. Even with all this, there will be a max tax increase of 2%+ or about 4-5% due to all the reassessments.
1stcav March 1, 2013 at 02:21 pm
We all had to tighten our belts and make tough decisions on items to do away with altogether , but WE did it.Now it's time for the schools and the Township , Mayor & staff to do the same....County and staff , DO the same, it's not same as yesterday and you will be HELD accountable for YOUR actions..this IS a warning to all of you....Mr Galante do you have your ears on ??????? Yup...sure do ....
Ken March 1, 2013 at 05:11 pm
I pretty much agree with all your suggestions as far as cuts, except for the sports and extracurricular. I think that should be even a bigger cut there. You want to join an extracurricular or play a sport than you should pay. We can not afford to keep running these programs. Do you see how much these coaches alone are paid, that is besides all the other costs that go along with these sports. Students should pay and these coaches should either do it free ot at least get there pay for this cut in half or more.
Michael Capo March 1, 2013 at 11:22 pm
They are starting to lay the groundwork for huge increases in property taxes. Their scapegoats are a lovey couple named Sandy and Chris.
Stan Buchwald March 1, 2013 at 11:42 pm
I've said it before and I'll say it again. To pick out the transportation and privatize it would only be a quick fix and amount to higher costs in the future. Not to mention leaving such a large school system such as Toms Rivers at the mercy of an outside firm. I agree with others that say the administration is far too bloated and should be trimmed. As for athletics and the choaches, there should not be positions added to the payroll to justify having them. We are talking about high school sports here. I am all in favor of scholastic sports and how it helps student development ,but not at the cost of the students ultimate goal of getting a quality education. All over too much money is funneled into sports programs and not into education. We don't need and or want assistants to assistants and extra secretary's to these assistants. It's just plain too much. The saying goes, A fish rots from the head down. Didn't these people learn form the Ritacco debacle. I think not. Business as usual for the TRBOE.
KC March 2, 2013 at 06:39 pm
As stated in a prior post, I believe it time that suburban districts DEMAND parity with allocations given to Abbott districts. Now they are a majority so what is their excuse for continuing to take a lion's share of resources? This is reverse discrimination. This should be put to a ballot. The so called minority and the politicos are stealing from your children.
KC March 2, 2013 at 06:42 pm
Lovely couple? More like bats out of hell. And you forgot FEMA!
Ken March 2, 2013 at 07:27 pm
I think Abbott districts should just be abolished.
~Barb~ March 3, 2013 at 11:04 am
ABOLISH TENURE!!!!!
ed crowley March 3, 2013 at 05:26 pm
When you are the fourth largest district in the state . You should be compared with those of similar size. Yes we are suburbs but we are the size of cities.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Toms River Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Ortley fulltimer June 8, 2013 at 04:01 pm
Great story! Glad to hear your on your way back. Also happy to see someone else noticing that inRead More some places it still looks like Sandy hit yesterday. Some mayors might consider that "complaining".
christine June 8, 2013 at 04:25 pm
To George ~ that is so unfair...plain and simple.
Av June 8, 2013 at 05:02 pm
I live under a gin mill oh yeah me and milk jug